Mischief in IPC
Mischief under IPC (Sections 425–440)
Definition (Section 425 IPC)
Mischief means – causing destruction of property or change in it (even if temporary), with intent to cause or knowing that it is likely to cause wrongful loss or damage to the public or to any person.
👉 Key Elements:
Intention or knowledge – The act must be done with intention or knowledge that wrongful loss/damage will occur.
Property – The property may belong to another person (ownership is important).
Loss or damage – The act must cause destruction or change in property, diminishing its value or utility.
Mens rea (guilty mind) – Without intent/knowledge, it is not mischief.
Illustrations (from IPC & common examples)
Cutting trees belonging to another.
Damaging someone’s car windows.
Spoiling stored food by adding poison.
Opening a water dam to flood another’s field.
Punishment (Section 426 IPC)
General punishment: Imprisonment up to 3 months, or fine, or both.
Special aggravated forms are covered under Sections 427–440 IPC (depending on value/damage, property type, danger to life, etc.).
Important Sections Related to Mischief
| Section | Provision | Punishment |
|---|---|---|
| 425 | Definition of Mischief | — |
| 426 | Punishment for mischief (simple) | 3 months / fine / both |
| 427 | Mischief causing damage of ₹50 or more | 2 years / fine / both |
| 428 | Mischief by killing/maiming animals (value ₹10 or more) | 2 years / fine / both |
| 429 | Mischief by killing/maiming cattle/animals (value ₹50 or more) | 5 years / fine / both |
| 430 | Mischief by causing diminution of water supply | 5 years / fine / both |
| 431 | Mischief by causing injury to public road, bridge, river, channel, etc. | 5 years / fine / both |
| 432 | Mischief by causing flood or inundation | 10 years / fine / both |
| 433 | Mischief by destroying machine/tools in mines | 5 years / fine / both |
| 434 | Mischief by destroying boundary marks | 1 year / fine / both |
| 435 | Mischief by fire/explosive (damage ₹100 or more) | 7 years / fine |
| 436 | Mischief by fire/explosive in dwelling house/place of worship | Life imprisonment or 10 years + fine |
| 437 | Mischief with intent to destroy vessel | 10 years / fine / both |
| 438 | Mischief with intent to destroy lighthouse, light buoy, etc. | 7 years / fine / both |
| 439 | Mischief with intent to wreck train/railway | Life imprisonment or 10 years + fine |
| 440 | Mischief committed after preparation for causing death/hurt | 5 years / fine / both |
Case Laws on Mischief
Sibu v. State of Kerala (2001)
The accused damaged the complainant’s autorickshaw.
Court held: Even if the property is not permanently destroyed, reducing its utility or value amounts to mischief.
Empress v. Kedar Nath (1883)
Accused obstructed a water channel, thereby reducing water supply.
Court held: Mischief includes any action diminishing property’s utility, even if temporarily.
T.K. Gopal v. State of Karnataka (2000)
Mischief must be committed with intention/knowledge of causing wrongful loss.
Court emphasized the importance of mens rea.
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Gian Chand (2001)
Accused set fire to a house.
Held: This was aggravated mischief under Section 436 IPC, punishable with life imprisonment.
Summary Table
| Point | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Definition | Intentional destruction or change in property causing wrongful loss/damage |
| Essentials | (1) Intention/knowledge, (2) Property of another, (3) Loss/damage caused |
| Nature | Offence against property, but affects ownership rights |
| General Punishment | 3 months/fine/both (Sec. 426) |
| Aggravated forms | Covered in Sections 427–440 IPC |
| Important Case Laws | Sibu v. State of Kerala (damage = mischief), Empress v. Kedar Nath (water obstruction), T.K. Gopal v. State of Karnataka (mens rea important), State of HP v. Gian Chand (house burning = aggravated mischief) |
RELATED Blog
0 comments