Right of Private Defence under Indian Penal Code
Right of Private Defence under Indian Penal Code (IPC)
Overview
The Right of Private Defence is a legal right granted to individuals under the Indian Penal Code to protect themselves or their property from unlawful harm or attack without waiting for the state to intervene. It serves as a defense against criminal liability if a person uses reasonable force to defend themselves or others.
Legal Provisions under IPC
Sections 96 to 106 of the IPC deal with the right of private defence.
It is a fundamental right but not absolute; it is subject to reasonableness and proportionality.
Key Features of Right of Private Defence
When is it available?
When there is an imminent threat or danger of bodily harm, wrongful restraint, or damage to property.
Applies only to unlawful acts (not lawful acts).
Who can exercise it?
Any person who is threatened or attacked.
Also extends to defending others and defending property.
Extent of the right (Section 99 IPC):
Reasonable force can be used.
It cannot extend to causing death unless the threat involves the danger of death or grievous hurt (Sections 100 and 101).
No right after the danger is over:
The right ceases once the danger has passed.
Detailed Explanation of Relevant Sections
Section 96: Act done in private defence is not an offense.
Section 97: Right of private defence of the body and property.
Section 98: Right of private defence against deadly assault.
Section 99: Acts which are not protected under right of private defence (excessive force, harm after danger is over).
Section 100: When right to cause death in private defence exists (threat of death, grievous hurt, rape, kidnapping, robbery).
Section 101: Right to cause death for protecting property.
Section 102: No right to private defence against the acts of public servants done in good faith.
Section 103: Commencement and continuation of right of private defence.
Important Principles
Necessity and Proportionality: The force used must be necessary and proportionate to the threat.
Immediacy: The threat must be imminent; no right if the danger is in the past or future.
No pre-emptive strike: Right arises only when attacked, not to provoke an attack.
Case Laws Illustrating Right of Private Defence
1. K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962)
Facts: The accused shot his wife’s lover after finding them together.
Judgment: The court held that private defence is applicable only when there is imminent danger. In this case, no imminent threat justified the use of lethal force.
Significance: Established that private defence does not cover pre-emptive or retaliatory attacks.
2. State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1967)
Facts: The accused attacked a person who was attempting to commit robbery.
Judgment: The court upheld the right of private defence to cause death in case of robbery.
Significance: Affirmed Section 100 IPC allowing right to cause death to prevent robbery.
3. Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka (2007)
Facts: The accused killed a person who was trying to rape a woman.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that the right of private defence justifies causing death if there is a threat of rape.
Significance: Affirmed protection under Section 100 IPC for prevention of rape.
4. Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab (1997)
Facts: The accused used excessive force in self-defence.
Judgment: The court held that private defence is valid only if the force used is proportionate.
Significance: Reaffirmed that right of private defence is limited and does not justify excessive force.
5. Badlu Ram v. State of Rajasthan (1978)
Facts: The accused caused grievous hurt in private defence.
Judgment: The court stated that private defence extends to causing grievous hurt when faced with imminent harm.
Significance: Reinforced the scope of right of private defence beyond mere bodily harm.
Summary Table: Right of Private Defence
| Aspect | Details | Relevant IPC Section / Case Law |
|---|---|---|
| Protection of body & property | Yes, against unlawful attacks | Sections 96-106, Section 97 |
| Use of deadly force | Allowed only if death/grievous hurt threatened | Section 100, State of Rajasthan v. Balchand |
| Proportionality | Force used must be reasonable | Section 99, Darshan Singh v. Punjab |
| Defence against rape | Right to cause death justified | Section 100, Chandrappa v. Karnataka |
| No defence after danger ends | Right ceases once threat is gone | Section 103 |
| Public servants exemption | No right against lawful acts of public servants | Section 102 |
RELATED Blog
0 comments