Society and its relation with Capital Punishment
Society and Its Relation with Capital Punishment
1. Introduction to Capital Punishment
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the state-sanctioned execution of a person as punishment for a serious crime, usually murder or treason.
It is considered the ultimate form of punishment.
The justification for capital punishment lies in its purported ability to:
Deter crime,
Provide retribution,
Ensure justice for victims,
And protect society.
2. Capital Punishment and Society
a) Social Purpose of Capital Punishment
Deterrence: The theory that fear of death discourages potential offenders.
Retribution: Capital punishment serves as society’s way of exacting justice and moral balance.
Protection: Removing dangerous criminals permanently protects society.
Moral and Ethical Standpoint: Some societies see it as a just response to heinous crimes.
b) Controversies and Societal Concerns
Human Rights and Dignity: Many argue capital punishment violates the inherent right to life.
Possibility of Wrongful Execution: Irreversible nature of death penalty raises the risk of executing innocent people.
Discrimination and Inequality: Studies show it may be applied disproportionately based on class, race, or social status.
Effectiveness as Deterrent: There is debate whether capital punishment actually deters crime more than life imprisonment.
Public Opinion: Society’s attitude varies widely—from strong support in some cultures to abolitionist views in others.
3. Judicial View on Capital Punishment and Society
The Courts balance between:
Preserving society’s interest in justice and safety,
And protecting individual rights including the right to life and fair trial.
4. Important Case Law Related to Capital Punishment and Society
Case 1: Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983)
Facts: The Supreme Court considered the application of the death penalty in murder cases.
Held: Death penalty is not to be imposed in a routine manner; it must be reserved for the "rarest of rare" cases.
Reasoning: The court recognized the gravity of capital punishment, balancing society’s demand for justice with human rights.
Significance: Introduced the "rarest of rare" doctrine, ensuring capital punishment is imposed only when absolutely necessary for societal protection and moral outrage.
Case 2: Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980)
Facts: Challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty.
Held: Death penalty is constitutional but must be imposed sparingly.
Reasoning: Recognized society’s interest in deterrence and justice but emphasized fundamental rights.
Significance: Reinforced that death penalty should be exceptional, balancing societal interests with human rights.
Case 3: Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India (2014)
Facts: Questioned delay in carrying out death sentences.
Held: Excessive delay in execution can violate human dignity and become a ground for commuting death to life imprisonment.
Reasoning: Society’s interest in punishment must be balanced against fair and humane treatment.
Significance: Emphasized societal justice must also align with constitutional morality and dignity.
5. Society’s Changing Attitude Towards Capital Punishment
Earlier societies often supported harsh penalties including death to maintain law and order.
Modern societies tend to emphasize rehabilitation and human rights.
Some countries have abolished the death penalty, viewing it as incompatible with a civilized society.
Societal debate continues on whether capital punishment is justified in modern times.
6. Summary
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Deterrence, retribution, protection of society |
| Judicial Balance | Death penalty only in "rarest of rare" cases |
| Human Rights Concern | Right to life and dignity vs. societal protection |
| Societal Debate | Effectiveness, morality, risk of error, inequality |
| Case Law Examples | Machhi Singh, Bachan Singh, Shatrughan Chauhan |
Conclusion
Capital punishment reflects a society’s deep conflict between the need for justice and protection and the respect for human life and dignity. Courts have tried to balance these competing interests, ensuring the death penalty is imposed only in exceptional cases, maintaining both social order and individual rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments