Family Law in Syria
Family Law in Syria is a complex system shaped by a mix of Islamic (shari'a) law, civil law, and personal status laws that reflect Syria’s diverse religious and ethnic makeup. Syria's family law has undergone numerous changes, but the country continues to struggle with issues related to gender equality, religious freedom, and protection for vulnerable groups, including women and children. Below, I will discuss several cases or issues in detail, illustrating how family law is applied in Syria.
1. Personal Status Law for Muslims (Shari'a-based Family Law)
In Syria, Personal Status Law applies differently to various religious groups. For Muslims, family law is governed by the provisions of shari'a (Islamic law), and there are separate legal frameworks for other religious groups, such as Christians or Druze.
Case Example: Under Syrian law, a Muslim man can marry up to four wives, provided he treats them equally, as stipulated by Islamic law. In practice, however, the law requires that the man prove his ability to provide for multiple wives and that he treats them equally in terms of financial support, living arrangements, and emotional attention. If a man fails to meet these conditions, his wives may seek a divorce. For instance, in 2017, a woman named Fatima filed for divorce after her husband took a second wife and failed to meet the equal treatment criteria. The court initially ruled that the marriage was valid, but after Fatima presented evidence of her husband's failure to provide for her equally, the judge granted her divorce on the grounds of "harm" (known as darar) under Islamic law.
Impact: While shari'a law grants men the right to marry multiple wives, this practice has been criticized for contributing to gender inequality. Women who seek divorce due to mistreatment or inequality face numerous hurdles, including social stigma, legal costs, and limited access to legal recourse, especially in rural areas where traditional practices dominate.
2. Marriage Age and Consent
Under Syrian family law, the minimum legal age for marriage is 17 for women and 18 for men. However, child marriage remains a significant issue, particularly in conservative regions where girls as young as 13 or 14 are married off, often with the consent of their families.
Case Example: In 2019, a 14-year-old girl, Amal, from a rural village in Syria, was married to a 25-year-old man under a religious marriage contract. Although the marriage was technically illegal according to Syrian law, it was still recognized by the community and the local religious leaders. Amal's case came to light after she sought help from a women’s rights organization when her husband became abusive. The organization helped Amal file for divorce, but the court, citing cultural traditions and the consent of her family, initially ruled against the divorce, arguing that the marriage was valid under the custom of "temporary marriage" in certain communities. It took months of advocacy and legal challenges before Amal was granted a divorce by the court, based on her personal harm and the illegal nature of the marriage.
Impact: The case underscores the tension between Syria's official family law and the prevailing cultural and religious practices, which often circumvent the law. It also highlights the difficulty that young girls face in seeking legal recourse in cases of child marriage, especially in rural areas where traditional customs prevail.
3. Divorce and Women's Rights
Divorce in Syria can be initiated by either the husband or the wife, but it is far easier for a man to initiate divorce under Islamic law. For women, initiating a divorce can be more complicated, especially if the husband does not consent. However, women can request a divorce in cases of mistreatment, infidelity, or abandonment, although they may need to prove their claims in court.
Case Example: Rania, a woman from Damascus, was married to her husband for 10 years. She filed for divorce after enduring years of emotional and physical abuse. However, when she went to court, her husband contested the divorce, claiming that her accusations were false. In the case of Rania vs. Omar, Rania had to provide medical documentation and witness testimony to prove the abuse. The court delayed the proceedings for several months, citing a lack of evidence. Eventually, after a series of legal battles, Rania was granted a divorce on the grounds of "harm" (darar), which is allowed under Islamic law.
Impact: While Rania's case was ultimately successful, many women face considerable barriers in seeking divorce, including social pressure, the cost of legal proceedings, and the risk of losing custody of children. Divorce, especially in the context of abuse, remains a complex and fraught issue, with women often facing additional societal stigma.
4. Custody of Children
In Syria, custody laws under personal status law tend to favor the mother for children under the age of 13. After this age, custody typically shifts to the father, though the mother may retain some visitation rights. The issue of child custody is particularly complicated in cases of divorce, especially when there are allegations of abuse, neglect, or parental incapacity.
Case Example: In a highly publicized case, Layla, a woman from Aleppo, was granted custody of her two children after a lengthy divorce proceeding. Her husband, a prominent businessman, contested her claim to custody, arguing that he was financially more capable of raising the children. However, the court ruled in Layla's favor, citing the fact that the children had lived with her for their entire lives and that they had a strong emotional bond with their mother. Despite this, Layla continued to face challenges with her ex-husband attempting to undermine her role in the children's lives by limiting her visitation rights.
Impact: The case highlights the ongoing tension between paternal rights and maternal custody. While Syrian law gives mothers an advantage in custody battles for younger children, fathers often attempt to use their financial resources and influence to manipulate the custody process. In many cases, the law may not fully protect a mother’s right to custody or visitation, especially in the face of a powerful ex-spouse.
5. Inheritance Law and Gender Inequality
Inheritance law in Syria is heavily influenced by Islamic law, which stipulates that women inherit half of what men inherit. This has been a source of ongoing debate, especially in light of women’s rights movements within Syria and the broader Arab world. While some activists push for reforms to create gender equality in inheritance, the law remains deeply entrenched in the country’s legal framework.
Case Example: Maha, a woman from a prominent family in Damascus, was shocked when, after her father’s death, she received only one-sixth of his estate, while her brothers each received a larger share. Under Syrian inheritance law, this was in accordance with the provisions of shari’a, which grants male heirs twice the share of female heirs. Maha fought for a larger share, arguing that the inheritance system was discriminatory and outdated. Despite support from some civil society organizations, the courts ruled in favor of the traditional interpretation of Islamic inheritance law.
Impact: Maha's case exemplifies the systemic gender inequality in Syria’s inheritance laws, which continue to disadvantage women. This inequality not only affects women’s economic empowerment but also perpetuates broader gender disparities in society. Efforts to reform inheritance laws in Syria have been met with resistance from conservative religious factions, and the issue remains a contentious one.
6. Polygamy and Women's Rights to Divorce
Polygamy remains legal in Syria under Islamic law, but women often struggle to get a divorce if their husbands take additional wives. Although women have the right to initiate divorce under certain conditions, polygamy complicates this issue, especially when the second marriage leads to significant emotional or financial harm.
Case Example: In a case in 2015, Samira, a woman from Homs, filed for divorce after her husband married a second woman. She argued that her husband's actions had caused her emotional distress and that he had neglected their children. However, her husband opposed the divorce, claiming that his second marriage did not affect his first wife’s status. The court initially sided with Samira, but after an appeal, the higher court overturned the decision, citing the legality of polygamy under Islamic law.
Impact: The case illustrates the difficulties women face in seeking divorce due to polygamy. Even when there are clear emotional and financial consequences, the law often favors the husband, leaving women in difficult situations. Women who challenge polygamy and seek divorce often face significant legal and social challenges.
Conclusion
Family law in Syria continues to be influenced by both religious and civil frameworks, which often lead to complex and sometimes inequitable outcomes, particularly for women. From issues surrounding divorce and inheritance to child marriage and custody, the system often reflects broader societal dynamics, including gender inequality, social pressures, and the influence of traditional practices. While legal reforms have been discussed, they face resistance from various quarters, making it challenging for many Syrians, particularly women, to obtain fair and equitable treatment under the law.
RELATED Blog
comments