Difference Between Dying Declaration and Dying Deposition
🏛️ Legal Framework
Dying Declaration: Defined under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a dying declaration is a statement made by a person who believes they are about to die, concerning the cause or circumstances of their death. This provision allows such statements to be admissible in court, even though they are hearsay, based on the presumption that a person on the verge of death would not lie.
Dying Deposition: While not explicitly defined in the Indian Evidence Act, a dying deposition is a statement made by a person who believes they are about to die, recorded in the presence of a magistrate. This formal recording process aims to ensure the reliability and voluntariness of the statement.
⚖️ Key Differences
| Aspect | Dying Declaration | Dying Deposition |
|---|---|---|
| Recording Authority | Can be recorded by a magistrate, police officer, or doctor. | Must be recorded by a magistrate. |
| Formality | Less formal; may be oral or written. | More formal; typically recorded in writing. |
| Presence of Parties | May or may not involve the presence of the accused or their counsel. | Recorded in the presence of the accused and their counsel. |
| Admissibility | Admissible under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act. | Admissible as per the procedure established by law. |
| Purpose | To record the statement of a person who believes they are about to die. | To record a statement in a formal legal setting, often for future use in court. |
📜 Case Law Illustrations
Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay (1958): The Supreme Court held that a dying declaration is admissible in evidence under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, provided it is made voluntarily and in a fit state of mind.
Ravi Kumar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2006): The Court reiterated that a dying declaration made in extremity, when the maker is at the point of death and every motive to lie is silenced, is admissible in evidence.
Queen Empress v. Abdulla (1886): This case established that a dying declaration can be in any form, including oral, written, or even gestures, as long as it pertains to the cause or circumstances of the death.
🧾 Practical Considerations
Recording Procedure: A dying declaration can be recorded by a magistrate, police officer, or doctor. However, for greater evidentiary value, it is preferable to have it recorded by a magistrate in the presence of the accused and their counsel.
Corroboration: While a dying declaration can be sufficient to convict, it is often advisable to corroborate it with other evidence to strengthen the case.
Admissibility in Court: Both dying declarations and dying depositions are admissible in court, but the manner of recording and the presence of parties can affect their weight and credibility.
✅ Conclusion
Understanding the distinctions between a dying declaration and a dying deposition is crucial in legal proceedings. While both pertain to statements made by individuals who believe they are about to die, the formalities and procedures surrounding their recording can influence their admissibility and weight in court. Legal practitioners must ensure that such statements are recorded in accordance with the law to uphold their evidentiary value.
RELATED Blog
0 comments