Aghnoo Nagesia vs State of Bihar
Aghnoo Nagesia vs State of Bihar – Case Overview
Citation: AIR 1966 SC 119; [1966] 1 SCR 134
Court: Supreme Court of India
Year: 1965
Facts of the Case
The appellant, Aghnoo Nagesia, was accused of murdering four members of his family, including his aunt, her daughter, her son-in-law, and the young child.
The accused went voluntarily to the police station and gave a detailed account of the incident in the First Information Report (FIR), describing motive, method, and outcome.
The FIR became the primary evidence against him at trial because there were no eyewitnesses.
The trial court convicted him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to death.
The Patna High Court confirmed the conviction on appeal.
Legal Question
Whether a confession made to a police officer (recorded in the FIR) is admissible as evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Relevant Law
Section 25, Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Confessions made to police officers are inadmissible.
Section 27: Exception for facts discovered as a result of information given by the accused.
Sections 24–26: Confessions induced by threats, promises, or obtained under custody.
Supreme Court’s Decision
Confessions to Police Are Inadmissible:
Any confession made to a police officer is inadmissible under Section 25, even if made voluntarily.
Confession Must Be Treated as a Whole:
The court cannot pick admissible and inadmissible parts separately. If a confession is tainted, the entire confession is excluded.
Section 27 Exception Does Not Apply:
Section 27 allows proof of facts discovered because of information given by the accused, but in this case, the confession was made before arrest, so Section 27 did not validate any part of the FIR.
Conviction Quashed:
Since the FIR confession was the primary evidence and there were no other independent proofs, the Supreme Court quashed the conviction and set aside the death sentence.
Key Legal Principles
Absolute Bar on Police Confessions:
Confessions made to police officers are inadmissible, regardless of voluntariness.
Confession Cannot Be Split:
Courts cannot admit parts of a confession; it is either fully admissible under Section 27 or fully inadmissible under Section 25.
Safeguard Against Coercion:
The ruling protects individuals from police pressure, coercion, or potential abuse of authority.
Importance of Independent Evidence:
Convictions cannot rest solely on a confession to police; independent corroboration is necessary.
Significance of the Case
Landmark on Confession Admissibility:
The case sets a precedent for excluding police confessions in criminal trials in India.
Influence on Modern Digital Evidence:
Even today, the principle applies to statements or confessions recorded electronically or online in cybercrime FIRs.
Fair Trial Safeguard:
Reinforces the right to a fair trial by preventing wrongful reliance on potentially coerced confessions.
Conclusion:
Aghnoo Nagesia vs State of Bihar firmly established that confessions made to police are inadmissible, cannot be partially used, and convictions require independent evidence. It is a cornerstone in Indian criminal law regarding evidence, confession, and fair trial rights.
RELATED Blog
comments