CONFESSION UNDER INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT

Confession under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

🔹 What is a Confession?

A Confession is a statement wholly or partly adverse to the person who makes it, made voluntarily, suggesting or implying guilt of a crime.

It is a special kind of admission specifically relating to guilt in a criminal case.

🔹 Legal Definition (Section 24)

The Act does not give a precise definition of confession but treats it as a statement made by accused implicating himself in the commission of the crime.

Unlike admission (which can be made by any party), a confession is always made by the accused person.

🔹 Important Sections Related to Confession

SectionTopicExplanation
24Confession caused by inducement, threat, or promiseSuch confessions are involuntary and inadmissible in evidence.
25Confession to police officerConfessions made to police officers are generally inadmissible except in special cases.
26Confession made after arrestConfession made after arrest must be voluntary and made in the presence of a magistrate to be admissible.
27Confession leading to discoveryStatements leading to discovery of facts or objects are admissible, even if not full confessions.
30Confession by co-accusedConfessions made by one accused are not generally admissible against co-accused, except in joint trial cases under specific conditions.

🔹 Essentials of a Valid Confession

Voluntary: It must be made without any threat, coercion, or promise.

Made by the accused: Only the person accused of the crime can make a confession.

Suggests guilt: The statement should imply guilt.

Free will: No inducement or torture used.

Made before a competent authority (especially for post-arrest confessions).

🔹 Confession vs Admission

AspectConfessionAdmission
Made byAccused onlyAny party in a civil or criminal case
NatureRelates to guilt in crimeSuggests fact relevant to the case
VoluntarinessMust be voluntary to be admissibleAdmissions can be voluntary or involuntary
Evidence ValueStrong evidence of guiltRelevant but not conclusive evidence

🔹 Case Law Highlights

State of Maharashtra v. Kanhaiyalal (1969) — Confession must be voluntary; inducement renders it inadmissible.

R. v. Nedrick (1986) (English case but often cited) — Focus on the voluntariness of the confession.

Summary:

PointExplanation
ConfessionStatement by accused implying guilt
VoluntarinessMust be free from threat, inducement
AdmissibilityConfession to police officer inadmissible (except discovery statements)
Confession after arrestShould be made before magistrate
Leading to discoveryStatements leading to discovery are admissible

Do write to us if you need any further assistance. 

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments