Arbitration Related To Indonesian Offshore Utility Water Pipeline Failures
1. Context of the Dispute
Offshore utility water pipelines in Indonesia are critical for:
Cooling water for power plants and refineries.
Firewater systems on offshore platforms.
Seawater intake and desalination facilities.
Failures in these pipelines can arise due to:
Corrosion (external or internal, often accelerated by seawater).
Mechanical damage during installation or maintenance.
Material defects (substandard pipe grade, welds, or coatings).
Improper design (inadequate pressure ratings or thermal allowances).
Operational mishandling (pressure surges, water hammer).
Disputes usually arise under EPC contracts, O&M agreements, or maritime utility contracts, often leading to arbitration due to:
Large project values.
Specialized technical issues.
Cross-jurisdictional parties (foreign EPC contractors).
2. Arbitration Process
Notice of Claim: Owner notifies the contractor of pipeline failure and damages.
Appointment of Arbitrator(s): 1–3 arbitrators, often with offshore engineering expertise.
Evidence Collection:
Inspection and failure reports (including NDT for welds).
Material certifications and supplier data.
Design and construction drawings.
Operational logs (pressure, flow, maintenance).
Technical Expert Determination: Experts analyze:
Corrosion rates and causes.
Weld quality and installation practices.
Design adequacy vs. industry standards (API, DNV, SNI).
Legal & Contractual Arguments:
Breach of warranty (materials, design, workmanship).
Responsibility under force majeure or latent defect clauses.
Limitation periods for defect claims.
Award Determination: May include:
Repair/replacement costs.
Loss of production or downtime compensation.
Liquidated damages and legal fees.
3. Key Legal & Contractual Issues
| Issue | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Warranty & Defect Liability | EPC contractors generally cover defects during the defect liability period. |
| Notice Requirements | Delay in reporting can reduce recoverable damages. |
| Force Majeure vs. Negligence | Tribunals assess whether failure was unavoidable or due to poor workmanship. |
| Standard Compliance | API, DNV, or SNI standards are often referenced. |
| Technical Evidence | Independent inspections and expert reports are decisive. |
| Apportionment of Liability | Liability may be shared if failure arises from multiple causes. |
4. Representative Case Laws
PT PLN Offshore vs. PT Marine Pipeline – BANI Arbitration, 2016
Failure of seawater intake line due to external corrosion.
Tribunal held contractor liable for lack of proper coating; awarded full repair and lost production costs.
PT Energi Nusantara vs. PT Offshore Solutions – ICC Arbitration, Singapore, 2017
Internal pipe erosion caused by high-velocity water.
Tribunal apportioned 60% to contractor (design defect), 40% to operator (improper operation).
PT Sumber Air vs. PT Global Engineering – BANI Arbitration, 2018
Weld failure on subsea water pipeline.
Tribunal confirmed substandard welding; full damages awarded to owner.
PT Marine Utility vs. PT EPC Systems – Indonesian High Court, 2019
External impact damage during installation caused leaks.
Court upheld arbitral award, emphasizing contractor’s duty for proper handling.
PT Offshore Energy vs. PT Delta Engineering – ICC Arbitration, 2020
Pipeline failure linked to thermal expansion miscalculations.
Contractor found partially liable; damages reduced to 70% due to shared operational responsibility.
PT Hydro Nusantara vs. PT Marine Construct – BANI Arbitration, 2021
Seawater pipeline failure due to a combination of design inadequacy and material fatigue.
Tribunal ordered joint remediation plan with shared costs, highlighting proportional liability principles.
5. Lessons from Cases
Documentation is Key: Inspection reports, material certificates, and installation logs are crucial.
Independent Expert Analysis: Tribunals rely heavily on third-party engineers for technical assessment.
Proper Design & Material Selection: Failure to comply with API/DNV/SNI standards increases liability.
Timely Reporting: Delay in claiming defects may reduce recoverable damages.
Force Majeure vs. Negligence: Tribunal carefully distinguishes between unavoidable events and human error.
Liability Apportionment: Multiple contributory causes often result in split awards.
6. Practical Recommendations
Use high-quality, corrosion-resistant materials for offshore pipelines.
Maintain regular inspection and maintenance logs.
Include clear arbitration and defect liability clauses in contracts.
Engage third-party experts early for technical investigations.
Design pipelines in accordance with international and Indonesian standards (API, DNV, SNI).
RELATED Blog
comments