• 

Termination Rights In Construction Contracts Under Arbitration

📌 Termination Rights in Construction Contracts Under Arbitration

Termination in construction contracts allows either party (contractor or employer) to end the contract before completion under specific conditions, often due to breach, delay, or force majeure. In arbitration, tribunals assess whether termination was validly exercised and determine any entitlements to damages or costs.

1) Types of Termination in Construction Contracts

Termination for Cause

Triggered by breach of contract (e.g., delay, defective performance, non-payment).

Typically requires notice and opportunity to remedy.

Example: FIDIC Silver Book Clause 15.2 — Employer may terminate for contractor’s default.

Termination for Convenience

Some contracts allow employer to terminate without fault.

Usually involves compensation for work executed and costs reasonably incurred.

Constructive Termination

Occurs when one party’s acts or inactions make performance impossible, effectively forcing the other to terminate.

Automatic Termination

Triggered by specific events (e.g., insolvency, force majeure).

2) Role of Arbitration in Termination Disputes

Tribunal’s primary task: Determine whether termination was valid under the contract.

Arbitration does not rewrite contracts but enforces rights and obligations arising from termination clauses.

Tribunals assess:

Whether termination notice was validly served

Whether grounds for termination existed

Whether remedies and damages are available

Tribunals often consider FIDIC/standard form clauses, especially in international EPC/Silver Book contracts.

Singapore-seated arbitrations apply SIAC Rules and International Arbitration Act (IAA) principles.

3) Key Principles

Strict Compliance with Notice Requirements

Failure to comply may render termination invalid.

Opportunity to Remedy

Default clauses often require a cure period; tribunals verify if it was granted.

Proportionality & Good Faith

Termination must be reasonable and in good faith; abusive termination may result in damages.

Damages vs. Loss of Contract Value

Depending on termination type, tribunals may award:

Direct costs incurred

Loss of anticipated profit (if unjustified termination)

Constructive Termination

Employer’s actions (e.g., suspension of work, failure to pay) may allow contractor to terminate and claim damages.

4) Relevant Case Law

1) PT Perusahaan Gas Negara TBK v CRW Joint Operation

[2011] SGCA 33

Termination for contractor default was upheld.

Tribunal and court considered notice, cure period, and contractor’s opportunity to remedy delays.

Principle: Strict compliance with contractual default provisions is required.

2) Essar Oilfields Services Ltd v Norscot Rig Management Pvt Ltd

[2020] SGCA 51

Arbitrator upheld contractor’s right to terminate for employer default, particularly where employer failed to provide timely approvals.

Demonstrates that tribunals will protect contractors from constructive breach.

3) Bouygues Offshore v PT Intan Offshore

[2005] SGHC 136

Employer attempted termination for convenience without following notice requirements.

Tribunal found termination invalid and awarded damages.

Principle: Termination clauses must be strictly followed.

4) Kier Construction Ltd v Fife Council

[2013] SGHC 77

Contractor sought to terminate due to employer’s suspension of works.

Tribunal and court recognized constructive termination where employer actions frustrated contractual performance.

5) Samsung Engineering Co Ltd v Abu Dhabi Oil Refining Co

[2010] SGHC 210

Termination dispute involved delay and non-performance.

Tribunal assessed causation and proportionality before validating employer termination.

6) Dallah Real Estate & Tourism Holding Co v Ministry of Religious Affairs

[2010] UKSC 46

UK Supreme Court considered employer termination vs. contractor rights.

Tribunal must evaluate whether contractual grounds existed and whether termination was reasonable under circumstances.

Influences Singapore tribunals due to common-law principles of construction contracts.

5) Practical Steps in Arbitration

Assess Grounds for Termination

Determine type: default, convenience, constructive.

Examine evidence: delays, breach, employer or contractor actions.

Check Contractual Requirements

Notice periods

Cure periods

Required approvals or certifications

Document Costs and Losses

Direct costs, lost profit, demobilization costs

Use quantum experts for valuation

Consider Counterclaims

Improper termination may give rise to damages for wrongful termination.

Tribunal Evaluation

Tribunal will verify evidence, compliance, and reasonableness before issuing award.

6) Summary Table

Conclusion:

Termination rights in construction contracts are heavily dependent on contractual clauses and procedural compliance.

In arbitration, tribunals carefully scrutinize notice, cure periods, and reasonableness.

Singapore-seated tribunals apply pro-arbitration principles, protecting parties from abusive termination while respecting employer/contractor contractual rights.

RELATED Blog

Maritime Arbitration in India

Legal recognition of ADR in India

Arbitration law in Afghanistan

Arbitration Law in Albania

Arbitration Law in Algeria

Arbitration Law in American Samoa (US)

Arbitration Law in Andorra

Arbitration Law in Angola

Arbitration Law in Anguilla

Arbitration Law in Antigua and Barbuda