Ppps And Arbitration In Nepal
📌 1. Chameliya Hydropower Project – China Gezhouba Group v. NEA
Type of PPP/Infrastructure: Hydropower (30 MW)
Dispute: Payment and variation order claims under EPC contract within a PPP framework.
Arbitration Outcome:
Tribunal awarded NPR 860 million plus interest in favor of the contractor.
Patan High Court enforced the award; Supreme Court issued an interim stay on payment.
Significance:
Confirms that PPPs in energy sector are subject to arbitration.
State-owned entities like NEA can be compelled to honor awards.
Reinforces the role of procedural compliance in enforcement.
📌 2. Upper Bhotekoshi Hydropower Project – Share Allocation and Local Stakeholders
Type of PPP: Hydropower with private participation
Dispute: Local residents demanded 10% free shares; operational delays followed.
Resolution: Negotiated settlement through arbitration-style mediation.
Significance:
Shows that PPP agreements may require arbitration or mediation to resolve stakeholder or equity-related conflicts.
Even informal arbitration mechanisms can be binding in PPP infrastructure.
📌 3. Mountain Energy Nepal Ltd. v. NEA (PPA Enforcement)
Type of PPP: Hydropower Power Purchase Agreement
Dispute: NEA delayed payments under PPA; claimed force majeure and reduction in purchase obligations.
Arbitration Outcome:
Domestic arbitral tribunal awarded full and partial claims in favor of Mountain Energy.
Patan High Court enforced award; NEA was directed to pay NPR 26.41 crore.
Significance:
Confirms that arbitration clauses in PPP contracts, especially PPAs, are enforceable.
Courts respect arbitral awards for PPP-related payment disputes.
📌 4. Bheri Babai Multipurpose Project – Contractor vs. Government
Type of PPP: Multipurpose water and irrigation project
Dispute: Scope changes, cost escalations, and delays due to force majeure events.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal partially awarded claims based on contractual adjustments.
Enforcement: High Court recognized award under domestic Arbitration Act.
Significance:
Reinforces arbitration as a mechanism in large-scale PPP projects.
Allows adjustments based on unforeseen circumstances in PPP contracts.
📌 5. Pokhara International Airport Expansion – Contractor vs. Government Authority
Type of PPP: Airport development with private contractor
Dispute: Delay in approvals, claims for additional payment and liquidated damages.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal awarded partial additional costs considering government delays.
Significance:
Arbitration ensures private contractors can claim relief even when working with government entities under PPP arrangements.
Highlights the need for precise dispute resolution clauses in PPP contracts.
📌 6. Kathmandu Ring Road – Joint Venture Contractor Dispute
Type of PPP: Urban road development
Dispute: Design modifications, cost escalation, and liquidated damages disputes.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal balanced contractor claims with contractual obligations; partial award granted.
Significance:
Demonstrates technical and contractual arbitration in PPPs where multiple parties and agencies are involved.
📌 7. Key Legal Principles in PPP Arbitration in Nepal
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Arbitration as primary mechanism | PPP contracts routinely include arbitration clauses; courts uphold awards. |
| State agencies not immune | NEA, Department of Roads, and other authorities can be arbitrated against. |
| Limited judicial review | Courts only review procedural compliance, jurisdiction, and public policy. |
| Contractual precision | Arbitration clauses must be clearly drafted; foreign awards require compliance with pre-arbitration steps. |
| Stakeholder mediation | Equity or community disputes in PPPs may involve arbitration-style negotiation. |
| Technical expertise | Large infrastructure PPP disputes require expert technical and contractual evaluation. |
🔹 Observations on PPP Arbitration Trends
Energy sector PPPs dominate arbitration in Nepal, reflecting hydropower’s prominence.
Infrastructure PPP disputes also include highways, airports, and multipurpose water projects.
Domestic tribunals are the default forum; foreign arbitration awards are enforceable if contractual steps and procedural requirements are met.
Enforcement often involves courts for interim or final recognition of awards.
Force majeure and scope changes are common causes of arbitration in PPPs.
RELATED Blog
comments