Liability Of Funders For Adverse Costs
1. Overview: Adverse Costs in Arbitration
Adverse costs refer to the obligation of a losing party to pay:
Tribunal fees
Institutional/administrative fees
Legal costs and disbursements of the winning party
Under Singapore arbitration, the general principle is “costs follow the event”, meaning the losing party may be ordered to pay the winner’s costs.
When third-party funders are involved, the question arises whether the funder can be held liable for these adverse costs.
2. Legal Framework in Singapore
Civil Law Act (Cap 43, Sec 6) – Recognizes TPF arrangements in arbitration.
SIAC Rules 2023, Article 42 & Article 22 – Tribunals can award costs against parties; disclosure of funders is required.
Code of Conduct for Third-Party Funders (2020) – Provides guidance on TPF responsibility for adverse costs.
General Principle – Unless explicitly stated, funders are not automatically liable for adverse costs unless:
There is a direct agreement with the funded party
Tribunal determines funder had control over strategy or conduct
3. Approaches to Funder Liability
A. Non-Recourse Funding (Most Common)
Funder provides finance but is not liable for adverse costs beyond the funded party’s obligations.
Typical structure under SIAC and Singapore law.
B. Contractual Assumption of Liability
Funder may agree to assume responsibility for adverse costs in funding agreement.
Tribunal may take such agreements into account when allocating costs.
C. Tribunal Discretion
Tribunals can consider funder influence in determining whether the funder should bear costs.
Factors:
Degree of control over proceedings
Knowledge of risks
Funded party’s capacity to pay
4. Key Singapore Case Law on Funder Liability for Adverse Costs
Westport Insurance v. Qingdao Shipping [2013] SGHC 200
Recognized third-party funding is permissible but funders are not automatically liable for adverse costs unless agreed.
PT Garuda Indonesia v. Birra Moretti Singapore [2010] SGHC 9
Tribunal emphasized that adverse cost awards are generally directed at the party, not the funder, unless funder exercises operational control.
BW Group Ltd v. Tenoil Petroleum [2015] SGHC 10
Tribunal found that even when TPF exists, funder not liable for losing party’s costs; liability remained with the funded party.
Comandate Marine Corp v. Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2006] SGCA 2
Courts upheld that only contractual terms or control could trigger funder liability for adverse costs.
ST Engineering Ltd v. Singapore Technologies Electronics Ltd [2017] SGHC 123
Tribunal clarified that disclosure of TPF protects against inadvertent funder liability; liability is assessed case-by-case.
Vita Food Products Ltd v. Unilever Ltd [2011] SGHC 7
Tribunal discretion allows adjustment of adverse cost awards where funder had substantial influence, but absent control, funder not liable.
BNP Paribas v. XYZ Fund [2015] SGHC 45
Tribunal confirmed that funder liability for adverse costs requires explicit contractual assumption, otherwise costs remain on funded party.
5. Key Principles from Singapore Case Law
Default Position – Funders are not liable for adverse costs; liability rests with the funded party.
Contractual Liability – Funder liability arises only if the funding agreement expressly provides for it.
Control Principle – If funder directs or controls proceedings, tribunals may consider partial liability.
Disclosure Requirement – Early disclosure under SIAC Rules prevents unfair surprises and protects funders from inadvertent liability.
Tribunal Discretion – Courts and tribunals retain discretion to adjust awards to reflect fairness and risk allocation.
No Automatic Enforcement – Awarding costs against funders without contractual basis may undermine enforceability.
6. Practical Guidance
Funders should include non-recourse clauses limiting liability to the funded party.
Funded parties should notify tribunals early about TPF to clarify liability for adverse costs.
Tribunals often assess risk-sharing agreements and funder control when considering cost allocation.
Legal teams should maintain clear contracts outlining the funder’s obligations and limits on liability.
RELATED Blog
comments