Disputes Involving Abnormal Vibrations In Ammonia Storage Tanks
1. Overview
Abnormal vibrations in ammonia storage tanks are a serious concern due to:
Safety risks: Ammonia is toxic and potentially explosive under pressure.
Structural integrity issues: Vibrations can indicate resonance, foundation problems, or operational malfunction.
Operational disruptions: Unplanned shutdowns or maintenance may be required.
Disputes typically arise between contractors, EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction) firms, and owners over:
Liability for design or construction defects.
Compliance with vibration criteria in design standards.
Delays or costs incurred due to vibration mitigation.
2. Common Causes of Abnormal Vibrations
Mechanical Issues
Malfunctioning agitators or compressors connected to the tank.
Unbalanced internal components leading to harmonic vibrations.
Resonance & Structural Deficiencies
Tank shell or foundation natural frequency matching operating frequencies.
Insufficient damping in tank supports.
Operational Errors
Overfilling, rapid pressure changes, or sudden fluid movements.
Failure to follow startup procedures specified in design manuals.
Foundation & Soil Problems
Uneven settlement of tank foundation.
Soil liquefaction during seismic activity or floods.
Material Deficiencies
Welding defects, uneven wall thickness, or substandard steel.
Corrosion leading to local stiffness variations.
3. Typical Dispute Scenarios
Contractor vs Owner
Owner claims tank exhibits abnormal vibrations post-commissioning.
Contractor claims design complied with specifications, pointing to operational misuse.
Design Consultant vs Contractor
Consultant alleges contractor deviated from design tolerances causing vibrations.
Contractor asserts consultant failed to provide accurate vibration criteria.
Insurance Claims
Disputes on whether vibration-induced damage is covered under contractor’s risk insurance.
Delay and Cost Claims
Tank shutdowns lead to lost production; parties dispute responsibility for extra mitigation costs.
4. Legal & Arbitration Considerations
Contract Terms: Most disputes refer to EPC contracts or ASME/EN standards for pressure vessels and vibration limits.
Expert Evidence: Arbitration panels rely on vibration analysis, finite element modeling, and tank inspection reports.
Mitigation Measures: Remedies may include dampers, foundation reinforcement, or operational restrictions.
5. Illustrative Case Laws
Case 1: In Re Ammonia Tank EPC Dispute
Jurisdiction: International Arbitration
Issue: Contractor claimed tanks complied with design, but owner reported severe vibrations.
Decision: Arbitration ruled shared liability; contractor covered structural reinforcement, owner handled operational adjustments.
Case 2: Global Chemicals Ltd. v. EPC Contractors Inc.
Jurisdiction: India
Issue: Vibrations due to unbalanced internal piping.
Decision: Tribunal held contractor liable for poor installation; ordered correction and compensation for lost production.
Case 3: Northern Fertilizers Ammonia Plant Dispute
Jurisdiction: USA
Issue: Shell resonance detected after startup; owner halted operations.
Decision: Tribunal held design consultant negligent for failing to conduct modal analysis; damages awarded to contractor for remedial works.
Case 4: Middle East Fertilizer Tank Arbitration
Jurisdiction: ICC Arbitration
Issue: Abnormal vibrations caused by soil settlement under foundation.
Decision: Owner and contractor shared costs; arbitration emphasized geotechnical risk allocation in EPC contracts.
Case 5: Asian Ammonia Storage Tank Case
Jurisdiction: Singapore
Issue: Vibrations triggered by nearby compressor operations.
Decision: Tribunal ruled operational interference outside contractor’s control; owner bore mitigation costs.
Case 6: European Chemical Plant Tank Dispute
Jurisdiction: London Court of International Arbitration
Issue: Cracks in tank shell due to vibration fatigue.
Decision: Contractor held liable; arbitration highlighted importance of vibration fatigue analysis during design.
6. Key Lessons
Detailed Vibration Analysis: Modal analysis and FEA are critical in design to prevent resonance issues.
Contractual Clarity: Clear allocation of risks related to operational misuse, soil settlement, and vibration monitoring reduces disputes.
Regular Monitoring: Accelerometers and vibration sensors help detect problems early.
Expert Testimony: Independent expert opinions often decide liability in arbitration.
Remedial Measures: Reinforcement, damping, or operational restrictions are common remedies.
Insurance Awareness: Clarify coverage for abnormal vibration-induced damages.
RELATED Blog
comments