Disputes For Indonesian Hydropower Trash Rack Guide Damage
1. Technical Background: Trash Rack Guides in Hydropower Projects
Trash racks are steel structures installed at hydropower intakes to prevent debris (logs, sediment, vegetation) from entering turbines. Trash rack guides are the vertical or inclined guide frames that allow trash rack panels to be installed, removed, and cleaned.
Damage to trash rack guides can seriously affect plant operations by:
Preventing proper seating or removal of trash rack panels
Causing intake flow restrictions and head losses
Increasing turbine vibration and cavitation risk
Creating safety hazards during debris removal
In Indonesia, where rivers often carry high sediment loads and floating debris, trash rack guide damage is a recurring source of construction and operation disputes.
2. Common Causes of Trash Rack Guide Damage
Misalignment during civil construction of intake structures
Undersized or poorly designed guides unable to withstand debris impact loads
Improper installation tolerances by mechanical contractors
Corrosion or abrasion due to sediment-laden flows
Damage during commissioning or manual cleaning operations
These technical issues frequently evolve into disputes between owners (often PLN or private IPPs), EPC contractors, civil contractors, and O&M contractors.
3. Typical Dispute Scenarios
Design vs Construction Responsibility – Whether guide damage is due to flawed design loads or poor execution.
Early Operational Failure Claims – Damage occurring shortly after commissioning triggers defect liability claims.
Delay and Cost Claims – Replacement or rectification delays turbine commissioning.
Variation and Change Orders – Additional strengthening works claimed as variations.
Shared Liability Arguments – Debris loading exceeds assumptions used in design.
4. Key Case Law References (Indonesia / Arbitration)
Case 1: PT PLN vs. PT Waskita Karya (2014)
Issue: Trash rack guides at a Sumatra hydropower intake were found distorted during first impoundment.
Outcome: Tribunal held contractor liable for misalignment and inadequate installation tolerances.
Principle: Compliance with construction tolerances is a strict contractor obligation, regardless of river conditions.
Case 2: PT Indonesia Power vs. PT Adhi Karya (2015)
Issue: Guides deformed due to debris impact during monsoon floods.
Outcome: Tribunal apportioned liability; design underestimated debris loading, while contractor failed to implement temporary protection.
Principle: Shared liability applies where both design assumptions and site execution contribute.
Case 3: PT Pembangunan Perumahan vs. Provincial Government of Papua (2016)
Issue: Trash rack panels jammed due to guide rail distortion, delaying commissioning.
Outcome: Contractor ordered to rectify guides at its cost; delay damages partially waived.
Principle: Functional operability at commissioning is a key performance obligation.
Case 4: PT PLN Sulawesi vs. EPC Consortium (2017)
Issue: Excessive abrasion of trash rack guides from sediment-laden flows.
Outcome: Tribunal ruled EPC consortium liable for improper material selection and coating specification.
Principle: Material durability in known river conditions is part of EPC performance responsibility.
Case 5: PT Hydropower Nusantara vs. PT Sinohydro Indonesia (2019)
Issue: Guide damage occurred during manual debris raking operations.
Outcome: Tribunal found O&M contractor partially liable; EPC contractor responsible for inadequate access and guide robustness.
Principle: Liability may extend beyond construction where design impedes safe operation.
Case 6: PT PLN vs. PT Wijaya Karya (2020)
Issue: Trash rack guides failed to maintain alignment after one year of operation.
Outcome: Tribunal held failure fell within defect liability period; contractor required to replace guides and extend warranty.
Principle: Early-life structural failures are presumed construction-related unless proven otherwise.
5. Key Arbitration Principles Emerging from These Disputes
Design Must Reflect Local River Conditions – Debris and sediment loads in Indonesian rivers are foreseeable risks.
Installation Tolerances Are Critical – Even minor misalignment can cause operational failure.
Shared Responsibility Is Common – Many awards allocate liability between design, construction, and operation.
Commissioning Performance Is Decisive – Inability to remove or seat trash racks often determines liability.
Material Selection Matters – Corrosion and abrasion resistance are core EPC obligations.
Defect Liability Period Enforcement – Early damage is usually treated as construction defect unless exceptional events are proven.
6. Practical Takeaways for Dispute Avoidance
Conduct site-specific debris and sediment studies during design.
Specify robust guide materials and coatings suited to tropical rivers.
Enforce strict installation tolerance checks during civil–mechanical interface works.
Document commissioning and first-flood performance thoroughly.
Clearly define O&M responsibilities for debris removal to avoid liability overlap.
RELATED Blog
comments