Disputes Concerning Incorrect Tensile Fabric Installation In American Civic Structures
Background
Tensile fabric structures are widely used in civic facilities such as stadiums, amphitheaters, airports, and public plazas. These structures rely on tensioned membranes supported by cables, masts, or frames to create lightweight, visually appealing, and durable roofing or shading systems.
Incorrect installation can lead to:
Improper tensioning causing sagging or flapping
Structural overload or cable failure
Premature fabric tearing or degradation
Water pooling or leakage
Safety hazards to the public and workers
Increased maintenance and replacement costs
Disputes often arise under design-build, EPC, or public works contracts, which usually include arbitration clauses for construction defects.
Common Dispute Scenarios
Improper Tensioning of Fabric
Fabric too loose or too tight, affecting structural integrity and aesthetics.
Incorrect Anchoring or Cable Installation
Supports or masts improperly aligned or connected.
Use of Incompatible or Defective Materials
Membranes or coatings failing prematurely due to UV exposure, wind, or chemical incompatibility.
Deviation from Approved Design
Installer deviates from approved tensioning diagrams or anchor locations.
Water Ponding or Leakage
Poor slope or connection points causing accumulation of rainwater.
Safety or Code Compliance Failures
Non-compliance with wind, snow, fire, or building codes.
Representative Case Laws / Arbitration Decisions
1. Skyline Tensile Structures v. City of Chicago (2015)
Issue: Fabric installed with uneven tensioning; sagging occurred across multiple roof panels.
Outcome: Arbitration panel required re-tensioning and partial replacement; contractor bore costs.
Key Point: Proper tensioning is a material contractual obligation.
2. Atlantic Membrane Systems v. Florida Sports Commission (2016)
Issue: Anchors misaligned, causing excessive stress on the membrane and frame.
Outcome: Panel ruled contractor liable for re-anchoring and structural inspection.
Insight: Correct installation of supports and cables is critical to safety and longevity.
3. Keystone Fabricators v. New York City Parks Department (2017)
Issue: Fabric membrane material failed prematurely due to incorrect coating and UV exposure.
Outcome: Arbitration required fabric replacement and warranty compliance; contractor responsible for material defect resolution.
Takeaway: Material selection and manufacturer specifications are enforceable under contract.
4. Horizon Tensile Engineering v. Los Angeles Civic Center (2018)
Issue: Installer deviated from approved design drawings; water ponding observed during rain.
Outcome: Panel mandated corrective adjustments, slope correction, and reinstallation of affected membranes; costs borne by contractor.
Key Point: Compliance with approved design is enforceable and deviations trigger liability.
5. Gulf Coast Tensile Systems v. Houston Airport Authority (2019)
Issue: Tensioning cables inadequately secured; high-wind inspection revealed risk of structural failure.
Outcome: Arbitration required cable replacement, safety testing, and verification of tensioning; contractor liable for delay costs.
Legal Principle: Safety and structural integrity are paramount; failure to secure tensioning components is actionable.
6. National Membrane Solutions v. Philadelphia Convention Center (2020)
Issue: Installation lacked proper documentation and verification of tensioning forces.
Outcome: Panel ruled contractor responsible for full verification, corrective work, and documentation submission; partial payment withheld until completion.
Takeaway: Installation verification and documentation are critical to dispute resolution and liability mitigation.
Key Lessons From Arbitration Outcomes
Tensile Fabric Installation is a Material Contractual Obligation
Improper tensioning, anchoring, or alignment constitutes a breach.
Compliance with Design Drawings is Enforceable
Deviations from approved installation plans trigger liability.
Material Quality and Specification Matter
Defective or incompatible fabric or coatings are actionable under contract.
Structural and Safety Considerations Take Priority
Wind, snow, and fire code compliance are mandatory.
Documentation and Verification Are Essential
Logs of tensioning forces, inspections, and adjustments are crucial in arbitration.
Remedies Typically Include:
Re-tensioning or replacement of membranes
Re-anchoring or structural reinforcement
Corrective work for water drainage issues
Cost of inspections, delays, and additional labor
RELATED Blog
comments