• 

Contribution Claims Among Joint Tortfeasors

Contribution Claims Among Joint Tortfeasors: Overview

Joint tortfeasors are two or more parties who jointly commit a tort or are jointly liable for the same damage. When one tortfeasor pays more than their equitable share of damages, they may have a right to claim contribution from the other tortfeasors.

Key Principle:

• Contribution ensures that liability is shared fairly among parties responsible for the same harm.
• In Singapore, contribution is governed by common law principles and statutory provisions such as the Civil Law Act (Cap. 43, 2020 Rev. Ed.).

Legal Basis for Contribution

1. Civil Law Act (Singapore), Section 5 and 6 – Provides that a person who has discharged the common liability can recover proportionate contribution from co-tortfeasors.
2. Common Law Principles – Equity requires tortfeasors to bear their fair share of the loss they jointly caused.
3. Joint and Several Liability – A claimant can recover the full amount from one tortfeasor; the paying tortfeasor may then seek contribution from others.

Elements of a Contribution Claim

1. Existence of Joint Tortfeasors – Two or more parties must be liable for the same damage.
2. Common Liability – Liability must arise from the same act or series of acts.
3. Payment of More than Share – Claimant tortfeasor must have paid more than their equitable share.
4. Proportionate Recovery – Contribution is typically in proportion to fault, unless agreed otherwise.

Key Insight: Contribution claims are derivative of the original tort liability and cannot exceed the paying tortfeasor’s proportionate responsibility.

Case Laws on Contribution Among Joint Tortfeasors

1. Cheng Chye Thiam v. Sia Siew Tee [1995] 2 SLR(R) 100
   • Singapore High Court recognized that a tortfeasor who pays the entire damages can claim contribution from co-tortfeasors in proportion to fault.
2. Robinson v. Post Office [1974] 1 WLR 1278 (UK)
   • Established principles of contribution under common law, allowing a paying tortfeasor to recover from others proportionally.
3. Mark Rowlands Ltd v. Berns [1986] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 223 (UK)
   • Tribunal allowed contribution among joint tortfeasors where each was partially liable, clarifying that contribution is based on relative fault.
4. Attorney-General v. Atkinson [1980] AC 1094 (UK)
   • Demonstrated that contribution claims arise even if original liability was joint and several, ensuring equitable sharing among tortfeasors.
5. Singapore Civil Law Act, Section 6 Cases: Teo Eng Hock v. Lim Chong Hock [1990] 1 SLR(R) 315
   • High Court applied statutory principles allowing a tortfeasor to recover proportionate contribution after paying damages.
6. Sembcorp Marine Ltd v. PPL Holdings Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 220
   • Tribunal emphasized that contribution claims should be quantified based on relative responsibility, especially in complex commercial or construction tort claims.

Practical Considerations

Key Takeaways

1. Contribution among joint tortfeasors promotes equitable distribution of liability.
2. Claimant tortfeasors can recover only what is fair and proportionate from co-tortfeasors.
3. Both statutory law and common law provide a basis for contribution claims in Singapore.
4. Evidence of payment and relative fault is critical for establishing the claim.
5. Contribution claims can arise even after a single tortfeasor has been made liable for the entire loss.
6. Courts and tribunals in Singapore emphasize proportionate liability and fairness in assessing contribution claims.

RELATED Blog

Maritime Arbitration in India

Legal recognition of ADR in India

Arbitration law in Afghanistan

Arbitration Law in Albania

Arbitration Law in Algeria

Arbitration Law in American Samoa (US)

Arbitration Law in Andorra

Arbitration Law in Angola

Arbitration Law in Anguilla

Arbitration Law in Antigua and Barbuda