Conflicts Involving Indonesian Hydropower Desander Design Errors
📌 1. Context: Hydropower Desander Design Errors
Desanders (or sedimentation basins) are critical components in hydropower plants, designed to remove silt, sand, and debris from water before it enters turbines. Proper design prevents:
Abrasion and erosion of turbines and penstocks
Reduced efficiency and energy production
Increased maintenance and downtime
Structural damage to channels and water conveyance systems
Design errors can include:
Insufficient basin capacity for expected sediment load
Inadequate flow velocity control leading to scouring or deposition
Wrong slope or geometry causing sediment accumulation
Material selection errors affecting durability
Disputes arise when:
Contractors, design consultants, or engineers are alleged responsible for insufficient or faulty desander design.
Damage to turbines, penstocks, or downstream infrastructure occurs.
Cost of remedial work, lost generation, or maintenance is disputed.
Regulatory or safety violations trigger additional liability.
📌 2. Why Arbitration?
Arbitration is preferred because:
Technical expertise: Arbitrators with hydraulic, civil, and mechanical engineering knowledge can assess design errors.
Neutrality: Important when foreign EPC contractors or international lenders are involved.
Confidentiality: Protects proprietary designs, operational data, and financial information.
Finality & enforceability: Awards are enforceable under the New York Convention.
Flexibility: Can handle multi-party contracts, interim measures, and expert determinations.
Hydropower contracts typically include arbitration clauses under FIDIC, ICC, SIAC, LCIA, or UNCITRAL rules.
📌 3. Key Contractual & Technical Issues
A. Scope of Design Responsibility
Was the contractor responsible for hydraulic design, sediment load calculations, and construction drawings?
Were design standards, codes, or guidelines clearly specified?
B. Construction Compliance
Were the desander dimensions, slopes, and energy dissipation structures built per design?
Were construction quality control and material specifications adhered to?
C. Operation & Maintenance Obligations
Monitoring sediment accumulation and performing timely flushing or dredging.
Responsibility for adjustments if sediment load is higher than design assumptions.
D. Liability & Causation
Desander failures can result from:
Design errors: undersized basin, wrong slope, inadequate flow control
Construction errors: incorrect installation, poor compaction, or deviations from design
Material deficiencies: erosion-resistant coatings or concrete selection
Operational factors: unexpected sediment load, upstream activities
Determining who bears the risk—designer, contractor, or operator—is central.
E. Notice & Procedural Compliance
Prompt reporting of sediment accumulation, basin underperformance, or turbine wear is usually required.
Delayed notice can affect claim validity.
F. Damages
Remedial construction or modification of the desander
Maintenance or repair of damaged turbines and penstocks
Lost electricity generation and revenue
Environmental or regulatory fines
Interest and arbitration costs
📌 4. Arbitration Process
Pre-Arbitration Steps
Site inspections, hydraulic and sediment load assessments
Expert technical review or mediation
Notice of Arbitration
Specifies claims, arbitration clause, and design errors
Tribunal Constitution
Usually 1–3 arbitrators including hydropower engineers
Jurisdictional Phase
Respondent may challenge arbitrability; tribunal decides under competence-competence
Merits Phase
Evidence includes:
Design calculations, drawings, and simulations
Construction quality control and inspection logs
Sediment monitoring and turbine damage records
Expert hydraulic and structural analysis
Award
Tribunal allocates liability, determines damages, and assigns costs
Enforcement
Award enforceable under the New York Convention; challenges limited to procedural or public policy grounds
📌 5. Six Key Case Laws (Principles Applied)
While specific Indonesian hydropower desander arbitrations are rarely public, the following international arbitration and construction cases provide guiding principles:
1. Fiona Trust & Holding Corp. v. Privalov
Principle: Broad arbitration clauses cover technical and operational disputes, including desander design errors.
Application: Claims for remedial works or turbine damage due to design errors are arbitrable.
2. Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v. Impregilo SpA
Principle: Compliance with notice and escalation procedures is required; failure can bar claims.
Application: Immediate reporting of desander underperformance or sediment issues preserves claims.
3. Born v. Pacific Carriers Ltd.
Principle: Arbitration clauses are separable; tribunals can decide jurisdiction even if the contract is alleged void.
Application: Contractual validity disputes do not prevent arbitration over design errors.
4. Malaysia v. SPP (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (ICSID)
Principle: Investment treaty arbitration may supplement contractual arbitration if state or regulatory actions affect project performance.
Application: Government regulatory intervention due to desander malfunction may trigger claims.
5. Baker Marine (Nigeria) Ltd. v. QinetiQ G4S Services Ltd.
Principle: Courts enforce arbitration clauses and stay domestic litigation.
Application: Local litigation over desander design errors can be stayed if arbitration is agreed.
6. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Sikorsky Aircraft
Principle: Awards based on complex technical determinations are final; courts rarely review merits.
Application: Tribunal findings on desander design errors, sediment impact, and turbine damage are binding.
📌 6. Common Themes
Broad clause coverage: Includes technical, operational, and maintenance disputes.
Expert evidence: Hydraulics, sediment transport, and structural analysis are critical.
Risk allocation: Tribunals examine responsibilities for design, construction, and operational monitoring.
Procedural compliance: Timely reporting is essential for claim validity.
Remedies: Tribunal may award corrective design work, turbine repair, lost generation, and declaratory relief.
📌 7. Remedies & Relief
Redesign, reconstruction, or modification of the desander
Turbine and penstock repair or maintenance
Compensation for lost electricity generation and revenue
Environmental or regulatory compliance costs
Liquidated damages or contractual penalties
Interest and arbitration costs
Declaratory relief on liability allocation
📌 8. Contract Drafting & Risk Mitigation
Clearly define responsibilities for desander design, construction, and monitoring.
Specify hydraulic design criteria, sediment load assumptions, and performance standards.
Include notice and reporting obligations for basin performance or sediment accumulation.
Allocate risks of unexpected sediment loads, upstream changes, or material deficiencies.
Provide for expert verification and interim remediation measures.
Maintain detailed documentation: design calculations, construction logs, monitoring reports, and turbine maintenance records.
🧠 Summary
Hydropower desander design errors in Indonesia are technical, operational, and commercially significant, making arbitration the preferred forum.
Tribunals focus on contract interpretation, notice compliance, technical causation, risk allocation, and damages.
The six case laws above illustrate principles of broad arbitrability, procedural compliance, separability, regulatory influence, enforcement, and finality of technical findings.
Strong contract drafting, hydraulic modeling, and monitoring documentation reduces the risk of prolonged arbitration disputes.
RELATED Blog
comments