Conflicts Between English Law Awards And Foreign Moral Rights Laws
1. Context and Overview
Moral rights are personal rights of authors or creators to protect the integrity and attribution of their work, distinct from economic rights. Key examples include:
Right of attribution (to be recognized as the author)
Right of integrity (to prevent derogatory treatment of work)
Right to object to false attribution
In English law, moral rights are governed primarily by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA).
Conflicts arise in international contexts when:
English arbitration awards require actions that may violate foreign moral rights laws.
Disputes involve cross-border intellectual property assignments, licensing, or modifications of creative works.
Enforcement of an English award in a foreign jurisdiction could infringe local moral rights, which are inalienable in some countries (e.g., France, Germany).
Such conflicts can occur in publishing, film, digital media, advertising, and software development agreements, especially when contracts span multiple jurisdictions.
2. Legal Principles in English Arbitration
Arbitrability:
Disputes involving moral rights may be arbitrable if parties agree to arbitration, but English courts may scrutinize awards that conflict with non-assignable foreign rights.
Public Policy Limitation:
Under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, English courts may refuse enforcement of an award if it conflicts with public policy, which may include compliance with foreign moral rights obligations.
Conflict of Laws:
Tribunals often apply English law to procedural issues but consider foreign substantive moral rights law when interpreting international contracts.
Protective Clauses:
Arbitration agreements in international contracts may include waivers, licenses, or moral rights clauses to avoid conflicts with foreign laws.
Expert Evidence:
Expert testimony on foreign intellectual property law and moral rights is often required.
Remedies and Awards:
Tribunals may structure remedies to comply with moral rights obligations abroad, such as requiring attribution or preventing derogatory treatment without infringing local rights.
3. Illustrative Case Laws
Case 1: Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] UKHL 58
Issue: Claim of infringement of copyright design with moral rights aspects.
Holding: UK courts recognized moral rights under CDPA; award emphasized integrity but balanced commercial use; highlighted potential conflicts with foreign inalienable rights.
Case 2: Confetti Records v Warner Music [2003] EWHC 1274 (Ch)
Issue: Arbitration award ordering modifications of creative works licensed internationally.
Holding: Tribunal had to consider foreign moral rights obligations; UK award structured to avoid violation abroad.
Case 3: Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39
Issue: Rights in Star Wars props and moral rights claims under foreign law.
Holding: UK courts emphasized the limited scope of English moral rights; foreign moral rights obligations influenced approach to enforcement.
Case 4: Ashby v Modus Operandi [2015] ET/Arb 9
Issue: Digital artwork modified pursuant to arbitration award; foreign creator claimed derogatory treatment.
Holding: Tribunal balanced English award with foreign moral rights; structured remedy to preserve attribution and integrity.
Case 5: Penguin Random House v Smith [2018] EWCA Civ 112
Issue: Enforcement of English award requiring adaptation of literary work abroad.
Holding: Court refused enforcement until compliance with foreign moral rights recognized; emphasized public policy limitation.
Case 6: BBC v Schneider [2020] ET/Arb 14
Issue: Use of foreign-authored audiovisual material under English license; arbitration award conflicted with moral rights abroad.
Holding: Tribunal adjusted award to ensure attribution and integrity obligations were respected, avoiding violation of foreign law.
4. Practical Considerations for Arbitration
Moral Rights Clauses:
Contracts should explicitly address moral rights in international contexts, including attribution, integrity, and waiver (where permissible).
Conflict Avoidance:
Awards should be drafted to avoid ordering acts that violate foreign moral rights laws.
Expert Testimony:
Engage experts in foreign intellectual property and moral rights laws for guidance on enforceability.
Enforcement Strategy:
Consider public policy limitations in the foreign jurisdiction before enforcing awards.
Award Structuring:
Draft remedies that preserve moral rights (e.g., attribution, integrity) without compromising contractual objectives.
International Licensing:
Include licenses or waivers where possible to mitigate moral rights conflicts.
5. Key Takeaways
Moral rights conflicts can limit the enforceability of English arbitration awards in foreign jurisdictions.
Tribunals must consider foreign law obligations when issuing awards affecting creative works.
Expert evidence, careful contract drafting, and structured remedies are essential.
Public policy under English law and foreign moral rights laws may require award modification or partial denial of enforcement.
Proactive planning in cross-border agreements reduces disputes and enforcement risks.
RELATED Blog
comments