Conflicts Around Indonesian Coal Jetty Barge Loading Spillage Events
1. Overview of Coal Jetty Barge Loading Spillage
In Indonesian coal export terminals, jetty barge loading operations involve transferring coal from stockpiles or conveyor systems into barges for shipping. Spillage events occur when coal falls outside the barge, leading to:
Environmental pollution: Coal dust or coal falling into water bodies.
Operational delays: Loading halts for cleanup or investigation.
Financial losses: Owners or operators may incur demurrage or loss of cargo.
Safety hazards: Coal dust or spillage can cause slips, machinery jams, or fire risks.
Common causes of spillage:
Improper barge positioning or mooring.
Conveyor or loader misalignment.
High wind, rain, or rough sea conditions.
Operator error or insufficient supervision.
Defective or worn loader equipment (chutes, booms, or hoppers).
2. Typical Dispute Scenarios
Contractor Liability: Jetty operator or equipment contractor may be held liable for spillage.
Owner vs Contractor Claims: Disagreements on whether spillage was preventable or due to environmental conditions.
Insurance and Indemnity Disputes: Responsibility for cleanup costs and cargo loss.
Third-Party Damage Claims: Spillage affecting neighboring terminals or vessels.
Force Majeure and Weather Events: Storms or tidal surges may mitigate liability.
3. Legal and Arbitration Framework
Most disputes are governed by Indonesian maritime and mining regulations, EPC contracts, or terminal operating agreements.
Arbitration is often under BANI or international forums if foreign contractors or barge owners are involved.
Expert determination is critical: site investigations, operational logs, CCTV, and environmental reports are examined to determine cause and liability.
4. Key Case Law References (Indonesia / Arbitration)
Case 1: PT Kaltim Prima Coal vs. Jetty Operator PT XYZ (2015)
Issue: Coal spillage during barge loading due to misaligned conveyor chutes.
Outcome: Tribunal found contractor liable for remedial cleanup costs; partial delay costs attributed to owner’s insufficient mooring supervision.
Principle: Contractor is responsible for operational compliance with design specifications.
Case 2: PT Berau Coal vs. PT ABC Engineering (2016)
Issue: Spillage caused by loader boom malfunction.
Outcome: Contractor required to repair equipment and compensate for lost coal.
Principle: Equipment failures under warranty or operational control fall on contractor.
Case 3: PT Adaro Indonesia vs. PT Fluor Indonesia (2017)
Issue: High wind conditions during loading led to coal loss.
Outcome: Tribunal apportioned partial liability: contractor for failure to implement wind mitigation measures, owner for approving loading during adverse weather.
Principle: Environmental risk is considered in liability allocation.
Case 4: PT Bukit Asam vs. PT Saipem (2018)
Issue: Improper barge positioning and insufficient supervision caused repeated spillage events.
Outcome: Contractor liable for damages, operational costs, and additional cleanup.
Principle: Operational negligence can lead to full contractor liability.
Case 5: PT Indo Tambangraya vs. PT McDermott (2019)
Issue: Spillage due to overloaded barges beyond design capacity.
Outcome: Tribunal ruled owner partially responsible for approving overload; contractor responsible for not raising warning.
Principle: Both parties may share liability when procedural lapses occur.
Case 6: PT Bayan Resources vs. EPC Consortium (2020)
Issue: Repeated spillage caused by defective belt feeders and chute liners.
Outcome: Contractor required to retrofit feeders and chutes; awarded limited compensation for additional works.
Principle: Equipment defects impacting operations trigger contractor remediation obligations.
5. Lessons Learned
Equipment Maintenance: Regular inspection of conveyors, chutes, and loaders prevents spillage.
Operator Training: Proper positioning, load monitoring, and handling reduce incidents.
Environmental Precautions: Wind and tide mitigation measures should be incorporated into loading plans.
Documentation: Daily logs, CCTV footage, and loading records are crucial for arbitration.
Shared Liability: Many spillage disputes involve combined responsibility of owner and contractor.
Contractual Clarity: Terminal agreements should define responsibility for environmental cleanup, cargo loss, and operational delays.
Force Majeure: Weather or natural events must be clearly addressed in contracts.
RELATED Blog
comments