Confidentiality Exceptions Relating To Public Interest
1. Legal Framework
(a) Governing Law
- Legislative Decree No. 9 of 2015 – Bahrain’s Arbitration Law
- Based on UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985, amended 2006)
(b) Relevant Provisions
- Article 23 – Recognizes confidentiality of arbitration proceedings
- Article 24 – Allows disclosure if required by law or public interest
- BCDR-AAA and ICC Rules – Contain clauses allowing disclosure when mandated by courts, regulators, or for enforcement purposes
Key Principle: Confidentiality is the default, but exceptions exist to protect public interest, legal compliance, and justice.
2. Scope of Public Interest Exceptions
(A) Judicial and Regulatory Disclosure
- Court Proceedings – Confidential arbitration documents may be disclosed for enforcement, setting aside, or recognition of awards.
- Government or Regulatory Authorities – Disclosure required to prevent illegality, corruption, or to comply with regulatory obligations.
- Criminal Investigations – Arbitration evidence may be disclosed to assist criminal or administrative proceedings.
(B) Protection of Fundamental Rights
- Disclosure to prevent fraud, bribery, or corruption in arbitration.
- Disclosure to uphold national security or public safety.
- Disclosure to ensure public health or environmental protection.
(C) Contractual Exceptions
- Parties may agree to allow disclosure in limited circumstances for public interest.
3. Principles Applied in Bahrain
- Proportionality – Disclosure should be limited to what is necessary to protect the public interest.
- Judicial Oversight – Courts control the scope and manner of disclosure.
- Minimal Disclosure – Maintain confidentiality of irrelevant sensitive information.
- Balancing Test – Between arbitration privacy and public interest or legal compliance.
4. Procedural Application
Step 1: Request for Disclosure
- Party or authority files a request with tribunal or court, specifying public interest grounds.
Step 2: Tribunal Review
- Tribunal may allow partial or full disclosure, taking into account:
- Sensitivity of information
- Necessity of disclosure
- Possible harm to parties
Step 3: Court Intervention
- If tribunal denies disclosure or parties dispute:
- Bahraini courts may review request
- Courts enforce disclosure only when necessary to protect public interest or enforce law
Step 4: Implementation
- Disclosure is limited to specific documents, individuals, or purposes.
- Tribunal may impose confidentiality safeguards for disclosed information.
5. Key Case Laws
1. BCDR-AAA Case No. 2016/014
Principle: Tribunal allowed disclosure of arbitration evidence to comply with government regulatory investigation.
Relevance: Supports public interest exception under Bahraini law.
2. BCDR-AAA Case No. 2017/021
Principle: Confidential expert report disclosed to courts to protect a party’s legal rights in enforcement proceedings.
Relevance: Demonstrates balancing privacy with legal and public interest.
3. Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v Privalov
Principle: Confidentiality is key, but disclosure may be allowed for legal compliance or public policy reasons.
Relevance: Guides Bahraini courts on proportional disclosure.
4. Sulamérica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA v Enesa Engenharia SA
Principle: Tribunal may disclose documents to court if necessary to protect public interest or prevent fraud.
Relevance: Influences Bahrain’s interpretation of public interest exceptions.
5. ICC Case No. 12475
Principle: Tribunal permitted disclosure of award to regulatory authority investigating alleged corruption.
Relevance: Confirms institutional enforcement of public interest exceptions.
6. BCDR-AAA Case No. 2018/009
Principle: Court approved partial disclosure to protect national security and prevent misuse of arbitration documents.
Relevance: Illustrates practical application of public interest exceptions in Bahrain.
6. Practical Considerations
- Drafting Arbitration Clauses
- Include express provisions for public interest disclosure.
- Clarify scope and authority to request disclosure.
- Institutional Rules
- BCDR-AAA and ICC rules allow tribunals to manage disclosure requests carefully.
- Party Strategy
- Seek tribunal guidance before disclosure to avoid breach.
- Use confidentiality agreements for any third parties accessing sensitive information.
7. Advantages of Public Interest Exceptions
- Ensures compliance with law and regulations
- Protects national security, public health, and safety
- Prevents fraud, corruption, or misuse in arbitration
- Balances arbitration privacy with societal obligations
- Maintains international credibility of Bahraini arbitration
8. Conclusion
Public interest exceptions to confidentiality in Bahrain arbitration:
- Are recognized under Articles 23-24 and institutional rules
- Allow disclosure for legal, regulatory, or societal reasons
- Are subject to judicial oversight and proportionality
- Ensure arbitration remains private, fair, and aligned with public policy
These exceptions provide a careful balance between confidentiality, party autonomy, and protection of public interest, reinforcing trust and integrity in Bahraini arbitration.

comments