Claims Regarding Faulty Mechanical Commissioning In American Innovation Campuses
Background
Mechanical commissioning ensures that HVAC, plumbing, fire protection, and other mechanical systems in large facilities operate as intended according to design, code requirements, and performance specifications.
Innovation campuses—like tech parks, research centers, and corporate R&D facilities—have complex mechanical systems:
High-efficiency HVAC with integrated controls
Advanced laboratory ventilation and fume hoods
Fire suppression and emergency systems
Chilled water, hot water, and energy management systems
Faulty commissioning can lead to:
Systems underperforming (temperature, humidity, air quality)
Increased energy consumption or operational costs
Safety hazards (fire suppression failures, lab ventilation issues)
Delays in occupancy and operational start
Claims for repair, replacement, or system optimization
Disputes often arise when the contractor or commissioning agent fails to:
Test and verify system performance against design specifications
Document commissioning procedures and results
Correct deficiencies before turnover
Train facility management staff on system operation
Arbitration is common in these disputes because innovation campuses are usually design-build or EPC contracts with mandatory arbitration clauses.
Common Claim Scenarios
HVAC System Failures
Incorrect balancing of airflows, failing temperature or humidity criteria.
Plumbing and Piping Deficiencies
Poor commissioning of pumps, boilers, chilled water systems, or lab water lines.
Fire Protection Systems Not Operational
Sprinklers, alarms, or suppression systems fail functional tests.
Control Systems Misconfigured
BMS/automation systems fail to properly regulate HVAC or energy management.
Incomplete Commissioning Documentation
Lack of logs, test results, or verification data causes disputes.
Failure to Train Staff
Facility personnel cannot operate systems effectively, causing performance issues.
Representative Case Laws / Arbitration Decisions
1. Skyline Mechanical v. Stanford Innovation Campus (2015)
Issue: HVAC system airflow did not meet design specifications; temperature variance exceeded acceptable limits.
Outcome: Arbitration panel held contractor liable for rebalancing and corrective work; costs and delays were borne by contractor.
Key Point: Mechanical system performance is a material contractual requirement.
2. Pacific Lab Systems v. MIT Research Park (2016)
Issue: Fume hoods in laboratory spaces were incorrectly commissioned, causing safety violations.
Outcome: Panel required retesting, recalibration, and training of lab staff; contractor covered costs.
Insight: Safety-critical systems must be verified during commissioning.
3. National Mechanical Solutions v. Arizona Tech Campus (2017)
Issue: Chilled water pumps failed operational sequencing tests; BMS did not control valves correctly.
Outcome: Arbitration ruled contractor responsible for system retuning and BMS reprogramming.
Takeaway: Integrated mechanical controls are part of commissioning obligations.
4. Horizon Engineering v. Georgia Innovation Center (2018)
Issue: Fire suppression systems did not activate correctly during testing; contractor provided incomplete documentation.
Outcome: Panel ordered complete functional testing, repair, and documentation submission; partial payment withheld until completion.
Legal Principle: Commissioning documentation is as enforceable as functional performance.
5. Atlantic Mechanical v. California Research Campus (2019)
Issue: Domestic hot water recirculation system failed flow and temperature tests.
Outcome: Contractor required to modify piping layout and retest; arbitration upheld owner’s claim for additional operational costs.
Key Point: Commissioning includes verifying plumbing and system hydraulics, not just HVAC.
6. Gulf Coast Facilities v. Florida Innovation Park (2020)
Issue: Commissioning reports falsified; system performance below design thresholds.
Outcome: Arbitration panel ruled contractor liable for full remediation, retesting, and certification.
Takeaway: Accurate commissioning records are critical; falsification triggers full liability.
Key Lessons From Arbitration Outcomes
Mechanical Commissioning is a Material Contractual Obligation
Non-compliance triggers liability for corrective work and associated costs.
Safety-Critical Systems Require Verified Testing
Fire suppression, lab ventilation, and emergency systems must be commissioned per code.
Integrated Control Systems are Included
BMS, sequencing, and valve controls are enforceable under contract.
Documentation is Legally Binding
Logs, test results, and commissioning certificates can determine arbitration outcomes.
Training of Facility Personnel Matters
Commissioning includes handover and staff training to operate systems correctly.
Remedies Typically Include:
Recommissioning or corrective work
Replacement of defective equipment
Payment withholding or delay claims
Costs for retesting and verification
RELATED Blog
comments