Claims About Breach Of Warranties In Canadian Business-Process Outsourcing
I. Understanding Breach of Warranties in BPO
In Canadian BPO contracts, warranties are typically expressed or implied promises about:
Performance: The BPO provider guarantees service delivery to certain standards or SLAs.
Accuracy: Work (payroll, accounting, call handling) is performed correctly.
Compliance: Services adhere to laws, regulatory standards, and client instructions.
Fitness for Purpose: The services are suitable for the client’s intended business process.
A breach of warranty occurs when the BPO provider fails to meet these obligations, even if the contract isn’t fully terminated. Remedies include damages, specific performance, or service credits.
II. Relevant Canadian Case Law
1. A & W Food Services of Canada Ltd. v. Norand Corp. (Technology/Service Integration Failure)
Facts: Norand supplied a software system to A & W for managing operations. The system failed to integrate properly, causing business disruption. A & W alleged breach of implied and express warranties about system performance.
Holding: Court allowed damages for breach of contract, including breach of implied warranties (fitness for purpose, merchantable quality).
Relevance to BPO: A BPO contract promising accurate and timely processing can be analogized; failure to meet performance standards may constitute a breach of express or implied warranties.
2. T.K.M. Communications Inc. v. A.T. Schindler Communications Inc. — Integrated System Warranty Breach
Facts: A provider failed to integrate technology properly into the client’s existing system. The plaintiff claimed breach of express warranties about system operation and integration.
Holding: Court held that failure to meet contractual performance standards constituted a breach of warranty. Damages were awarded for losses caused by the integration failure.
Relevance: Demonstrates that in Canadian courts, performance warranties in service contracts are enforceable, including in BPO contracts where outsourced processes fail.
3. Ticketnet v. Air Canada — Failure to Deliver Contractually Promised Software/Services
Facts: Air Canada failed to deliver promised ticketing software to Ticketnet. Ticketnet claimed breach of express warranties in the contract regarding timely and functional delivery.
Holding: Court held in favor of Ticketnet, awarding damages. The breach of warranties was central to the claim, as it prevented the core business purpose from being fulfilled.
Relevance: In BPO, express warranties regarding accuracy, timeliness, and scope of services are similarly enforceable if the provider fails to meet them.
4. Kanitz v. Rogers Cable Inc. — Online Service Contract Terms
Facts: Rogers modified online service agreements. Customers claimed modifications violated service warranties and were unaware of them.
Holding: Court enforced the online terms and emphasized the importance of clear notice for warranties and obligations.
Relevance: BPO clients rely on express warranties in contracts; clear documentation and communication of warranties are critical, and courts will enforce properly documented warranties.
5. Bhasin v. Hrynew (2014 SCC 71) — Duty of Honest Performance
Facts: A dealership contract was terminated, and one party misled the other. The Supreme Court recognized a general duty of honest performance in all contracts.
Relevance to BPO: Even when express warranties exist, failure to perform honestly or misrepresentation of service delivery may constitute a breach. For example, reporting SLA compliance falsely or claiming process accuracy when errors occur can be actionable.
6. Hunter Engineering Co. v. Syncrude Canada Ltd. — Limitation of Liability vs. Warranty Breach
Facts: A supplier delivered defective components; the contract included a liability limitation clause. Supreme Court analyzed whether warranty breach claims could bypass limitations.
Holding: Courts enforce clear contractual limitations but allow claims for fundamental breaches that deprive the other party of substantially the whole benefit of the contract.
Relevance: In BPO, even with liability limits, breach of fundamental warranties (accuracy, compliance, timeliness) may allow full damages if the breach undermines the purpose of the outsourcing.
7. Rudder v. Microsoft Corp. — Online Contract Acceptance and Warranty Claims
Facts: Microsoft argued online service terms prevented Canadian users from suing. Users claimed breaches related to software and service obligations (analogous to warranty claims).
Holding: Click‑wrap licences are enforceable; warranties stated in contracts are binding if accepted.
Relevance: BPO contracts often include service warranties in digital/online agreements, and courts enforce these if acceptance is documented.
III. Key Legal Principles From These Cases
| Principle | Application in BPO Warranty Claims |
|---|---|
| Express warranties are enforceable | Written promises about performance, accuracy, or timeliness are legally binding (A & W; Ticketnet). |
| Implied warranties may exist | Fitness for purpose and merchantable quality apply even if not expressly stated (T.K.M.). |
| Honest performance required | Misrepresentation or falsifying performance metrics can lead to warranty breach claims (Bhasin). |
| Contractual notice & documentation | Warranties must be clear, communicated, and agreed upon (Kanitz; Rudder). |
| Liability limitations may not protect fundamental breach | Severe breaches that defeat contract purpose can bypass limitation clauses (Hunter Engineering). |
| Damages are recoverable | Clients can recover losses arising from warranty breaches, including consequential damages (Ticketnet). |
IV. Practical Examples of Breach of Warranties in BPO
Payroll BPO: Provider fails to process salaries correctly due to software errors → breach of warranty of accuracy.
Call Center Outsourcing: SLA promised 95% call pick-up rate → actual performance 80% → breach of performance warranty.
Accounting BPO: Provider submits regulatory filings late → breach of compliance warranty.
IT BPO: Failure to migrate data correctly or ensure system integration → breach of express integration warranties.
Back-Office Processing: Provider misreports transaction volumes or metrics → breach of warranty of reporting/accuracy.
V. Conclusion
Canadian courts recognize that BPO providers can be liable for breach of both express and implied warranties, especially when the breach affects:
Core business operations
Accuracy and timeliness of service
Compliance with regulatory or contractual requirements
Key Takeaways:
Clearly draft and communicate all warranties in the BPO contract.
Document acceptance to enforce warranties (especially in online or digital contracts).
Include remedies for breach, but understand fundamental breaches may override liability limitations.
Ensure honest reporting and performance to avoid additional claims under Bhasin.
Monitor SLA compliance to prevent breaches of express performance warranties.
RELATED Blog
comments