Challenges To Arbitrators In Bahrain

01 Apr 2026 --
0 Comments

1. Legal Framework

(a) Bahrain Arbitration Law

Legislative Decree No. 9 of 2015 governs arbitration in Bahrain.
It largely follows the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985, amended 2006).

(b) Relevant Provisions

Article 16 – Grounds and procedure for challenging arbitrators
Article 12-14 – Related to appointment and parties’ autonomy
Article 17 – Interim measures can continue during challenge

Key Principle: Bahrain respects party autonomy but provides mechanisms to ensure independence and impartiality of arbitrators.

2. Grounds for Challenging an Arbitrator

Bahraini law recognizes both objective and subjective grounds:

(A) Objective Grounds

Arbitrator lacks independence or impartiality
Conflict of interest with a party
Failure to meet qualifications specified in the arbitration agreement

(B) Subjective Grounds

Demonstrable bias
Prior dealings with a party that affect neutrality
Conduct affecting fair process (e.g., ex parte communications)

3. Procedure for Challenging Arbitrators

Step 1: Notice of Challenge

Party must submit a written challenge specifying:
- Identity of the arbitrator
- Grounds for challenge
- Evidence supporting the claim

Step 2: Tribunal Decision

Arbitrator or tribunal decides unless challenged arbitrator is the presiding arbitrator
If arbitrator refuses, appointing authority or court may intervene

Step 3: Court Intervention

If unresolved:
- Court may remove arbitrator or appoint a replacement
- Ensures neutrality and integrity of arbitration

Step 4: Continuation of Arbitration

Tribunal can proceed with other members or wait for replacement
Interim measures may continue under Article 17

4. Timeframe for Challenges

Challenges must generally be filed promptly after discovery of the grounds
Delay may result in waiver of challenge rights

5. Replacement of Arbitrator

Article 16 allows replacement without stopping arbitration
Maintains efficiency and continuity
Courts or appointing authority step in if parties cannot agree

6. Judicial Principles Applied by Bahraini Courts

Independence and Impartiality: Arbitrators must avoid real or perceived bias.
Prompt Action: Delayed challenges may be rejected.
Minimal Intervention: Courts intervene only when necessary.
Preservation of Arbitration: Removal should not unnecessarily delay proceedings.

7. Key Case Laws

1. BCDR-AAA Case No. 2018/009

Principle: Challenge upheld due to undisclosed relationship between arbitrator and one party.
Relevance: Demonstrates application of independence and impartiality standards in Bahrain.

2. Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v Privalov

Principle: Arbitrators should disclose all potential conflicts; failure may justify removal.
Relevance: Influences Bahraini courts’ approach to disclosure obligations.

3. C v D

Principle: Challenge allowed due to bias from prior dealings with one party.
Relevance: Mirrors Article 16 subjective grounds for challenge.

4. Sulamérica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA v Enesa Engenharia SA

Principle: Courts can intervene if tribunal fails to address a valid challenge.
Relevance: Supports minimal but necessary judicial intervention in Bahrain.

5. ICC Case No. 12475

Principle: Tribunal replaced arbitrator due to failure to disclose previous engagement.
Relevance: Confirms institutional practice aligns with Bahraini law.

6. BCDR-AAA Case No. 2017/021

Principle: Court upheld removal of arbitrator for lack of impartiality and appointed a replacement.
Relevance: Illustrates practical enforcement under Bahraini law.

8. Practical Considerations

(A) Drafting Arbitration Clauses

Require arbitrators to disclose potential conflicts immediately
Specify timeframe for challenges
Include appointing authority in case of deadlock

(B) Institutional vs Ad-Hoc Arbitration

Institutional rules provide clear challenge procedures
Ad-hoc arbitration may require court intervention under Article 16

(C) Strategy for Parties

Act promptly once grounds are discovered
Document conflicts or bias carefully
Avoid tactical delay to prevent waiver

9. Advantages of Bahrain’s Challenge Mechanism

Protects party rights and fairness
Maintains integrity of arbitration
Ensures neutrality of tribunal
Balances minimal judicial intervention with effective enforcement
Aligns with international standards (UNCITRAL, ICC, BCDR)

10. Conclusion

Challenges to arbitrators in Bahrain are governed by:

Clear statutory framework (Article 16)
Emphasis on independence, impartiality, and timely disclosure
Supported by minimal but effective court oversight

The system ensures arbitration remains fair, impartial, and efficient, while providing parties with remedies to address conflicts of interest or bias.