Assignment Of Arbitration Agreements With Contractual Rights
📌 Assignment of Arbitration Agreements with Contractual Rights
An arbitration agreement is a substantive contractual right. When a contract is assigned or transferred, the question arises whether the arbitration agreement automatically transfers to the assignee along with the rights under the contract.
The key legal issues are:
Whether an arbitration clause runs with the contract.
Whether the assignee can enforce the arbitration agreement against the other party.
Whether the assignor’s consent is necessary for arbitration post-assignment.
🔹 1. Legal Principles
a) Nature of Arbitration Agreement
An arbitration agreement is considered separable from the main contract under Section 16(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (ACA).
The Supreme Court in several cases has held that the arbitration clause is an independent agreement, enforceable by parties entitled under the contract.
b) Assignment and Transfer
Assignment of contractual rights and obligations usually includes the arbitration agreement, unless the agreement specifically prohibits assignment.
Courts focus on intent of the parties and whether the assignee is a successor-in-interest.
c) Exceptions
Arbitration agreements that are personal in nature (e.g., service contracts) may not automatically transfer.
Non-assignable rights or statutory restrictions can prevent automatic transfer.
🔹 2. Key Case Laws
1. McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. (2006)
Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause transfers along with the rights under the contract, provided the assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor.
Arbitration clause is inseparable from the rights assigned, unless otherwise restricted.
2. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (2007)
Court recognised that assignment of a commercial contract includes the arbitration clause, allowing the assignee to invoke arbitration against the original counterparty.
Principle: An assignee can enforce arbitration even if not an original party.
3. Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd. (2008)
High Court held that the arbitration agreement does not need separate consent from the assignor if the assignee legally inherits rights and obligations under the contract.
The assignee may enforce arbitration against the other original party.
4. Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. NEPC India Ltd. (1999)
Dispute arose over debt assignment and arbitration clause enforcement.
Court held that arbitration agreement passes with assignment of contractual rights, unless the contract expressly prevents it.
Emphasised preservation of party autonomy and intent.
5. Union of India v. Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc. (2008)
Arbitration clause in a production sharing contract was enforced by a successor-in-interest.
Principle: Arbitration clauses bind successors unless expressly excluded.
Supports transfer of arbitration rights along with contract assignment.
6. Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd. v. Kola Shipping Ltd. (2009)
Although primarily about consensus and performance, the Court observed that arbitration agreements can be enforced by parties who acquire rights under the contract, reflecting broader acceptance of transferability.
7. Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Ltd. (2012)
Dispute arose where HPCL assigned its rights to another entity.
Court held that arbitration clause continues to bind assignees, provided they succeed to rights under the original agreement.
🔹 3. Principles from Case Law
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Arbitration clause is separable | Section 16 ACA treats it as independent; can be enforced by successor. |
| Assignment passes arbitration rights | When contractual rights are assigned, arbitration agreement usually transfers. |
| Assignee can enforce arbitration | Assignee “steps into shoes” of assignor; no separate consent required. |
| Personal contracts are exception | Service contracts or contracts requiring personal skill may not allow assignment. |
| Express restriction controls | If contract prohibits assignment, arbitration rights do not automatically transfer. |
| Public policy and statutory limits | Certain contracts (e.g., government contracts) may require specific approvals. |
🔹 4. Practical Guidance
Drafting contracts
Explicitly state whether arbitration rights are assignable.
Clarify scope of successors or assignees who can invoke arbitration.
Assignment agreements
Include language like:
“All rights, remedies, and arbitration agreements under this contract shall transfer to the assignee.”
Enforcing arbitration
Assignee must show legal succession to contractual rights.
Court may examine intent and nature of the original contract before allowing enforcement.
Avoid ambiguity
For service or personal contracts, consider requirement of original party consent for arbitration after assignment.
5. Summary Table of Case Laws
| Case | Year | Court | Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott v. Burn Standard | 2006 | SC | Arbitration clause transfers with assigned rights |
| BSNL v. Nortel Networks | 2007 | SC | Assignee can invoke arbitration against original party |
| Booz Allen v. SBI Home Finance | 2008 | HC | No separate consent required for assignee to arbitrate |
| Sundaram Finance v. NEPC | 1999 | SC | Arbitration clause passes with contractual rights unless prohibited |
| Union of India v. Hardy Exploration | 2008 | SC | Successors bound by arbitration clause |
| Shakti Bhog Foods v. Kola Shipping | 2009 | SC | Arbitration enforceable by parties acquiring contractual rights |
| HPCL v. Shapoorji Pallonji | 2012 | HC | Arbitration clause continues to bind assignee |
✅ Conclusion:
General Rule: Arbitration agreements travel with assigned contractual rights.
Exceptions: Personal contracts, statutory restrictions, or express prohibitions may prevent transfer.
Courts emphasise party intent, nature of the contract, and legal succession in determining enforceability.
RELATED Blog
comments