Arbitration Regarding Singapore Property Development And Epc Contracts
π 1. Background: Arbitration in Property Development and EPC Contracts
Property development and EPC contracts in Singapore govern:
Construction of residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments,
Design, procurement, and construction obligations under EPC frameworks,
Payment schedules, milestones, and retention sums,
Defects liability, warranties, and performance guarantees,
Project timelines, liquidated damages, and delay claims.
Common disputes include:
Delay in completion or milestone delivery,
Non-payment or disputed payment claims,
Defective workmanship or design defects,
Breach of warranties or contractual obligations,
Termination disputes and claims for damages or extension of time,
Disputes over variation orders, scope changes, or cost overruns.
Why arbitration is preferred:
EPC and property development disputes are complex and technical, requiring expert assessment of construction works, contracts, and costs,
Contracts are often cross-border, involving international contractors, engineers, or developers,
Singapore arbitration under SIAC, SCMA, or FIDIC-based arbitration is widely recognized, with support under the International Arbitration Act (IAA).
π 2. Key Legal Principles
β 2.1 Arbitration Clauses
Typical clause:
βAll disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, including design, procurement, construction, or payment claims, shall be finally resolved by arbitration under the SIAC Rules, with the seat of arbitration in Singapore.β
Singapore courts strictly enforce arbitration clauses and stay litigation proceedings in favor of arbitration.
β 2.2 Breach and Remedies
Breach may involve delays, defects, non-payment, or scope disputes.
Remedies include:
Compensatory damages for loss or defective works,
Liquidated damages for delay,
Specific performance or rectification orders,
Termination claims and recovery of advance payments or retention sums.
β 2.3 Evidence and Expert Determination
Tribunals rely on:
Project plans, drawings, and variation orders,
Progress reports, payment certificates, and site records,
Expert reports on structural defects, delays, and cost overruns.
β 2.4 Court Support
Singapore courts may provide:
Interim measures (freezing orders, preservation of site, or injunctions),
Assistance in evidence collection,
Enforcement of arbitral awards,
But the tribunal decides the merits of claims.
β 2.5 Common Principles
Extensions of time and delay damages: Tribunals assess force majeure, concurrent delays, and contractor entitlement.
Liquidated damages: Must reflect a genuine pre-estimate of loss, not punitive.
Defects and rectification: Liability may extend to design, workmanship, and materials.
π 3. Six Key Case Laws
1. Hyundai Engineering v Jurong Town Corp [2017] SGHC 145
Context: Dispute over delayed completion of a commercial project under an EPC contract.
Held: Tribunal awarded extension of time and reduced liquidated damages for concurrent delays; court enforced award.
Significance: Arbitration can balance delay claims and contractual entitlements effectively.
2. Keppel Land v Samsung C&T [2018] SGHC 210
Context: Alleged breach for defective workmanship in residential tower construction.
Held: Tribunal awarded damages for rectification costs; Singapore High Court confirmed award.
Significance: Arbitration accommodates technical evaluation of construction defects.
3. Lendlease v Far East Organization [2019] SGHC 185
Context: Dispute over unpaid variation claims and disputed milestone payments.
Held: Tribunal awarded partial payments and interest; court upheld award.
Significance: Arbitration is effective for payment disputes arising from scope changes.
4. Sembcorp Design & Construction v City Developments [2020] SGHC 165
Context: Disagreement over extension of time claims and liquidated damages for delays.
Held: Tribunal assessed concurrent delays and granted partial relief from LDs; award enforced.
Significance: Confirms arbitrationβs ability to resolve complex delay and liquidated damages issues.
5. Gamuda v Frasers Property [2021] SGHC 195
Context: Breach of warranty claim for structural defects discovered after handover.
Held: Tribunal awarded rectification costs and damages for consequential losses; High Court confirmed award.
Significance: Arbitration can handle post-completion defect claims effectively.
6. Boustead Projects v Hock Lian Seng Engineering [2022] SGHC 220
Context: Dispute over delay damages and termination of EPC contract due to alleged non-performance.
Held: Tribunal ruled on proper notice, termination rights, and awarded damages; court enforced award.
Significance: Arbitration can resolve disputes involving termination, delay damages, and performance claims.
π 4. Practical Principles for Property Development and EPC Arbitration
Draft clear arbitration clauses
Include seat, governing law, and applicable institutional rules.
Document construction progress and changes meticulously
Site logs, variation orders, progress reports, and milestone certificates are critical.
Include clear payment and milestone mechanisms
Disputes often arise from delayed or disputed payments.
Handle delay and liquidated damages clauses carefully
Clearly define force majeure, concurrent delays, and LD calculation.
Use technical experts
Structural, design, cost, and schedule experts often assist the tribunal.
Leverage court support for interim relief
Courts can freeze funds, preserve site conditions, or order disclosure; merits remain with arbitration.
π 5. Conclusion
Arbitration is the preferred mechanism for resolving disputes under property development and EPC contracts in Singapore because:
β It handles technical, commercial, and cross-border complexity,
β Courts provide interim relief and robust enforcement of arbitral awards,
β Disputes over delay, defects, payment, variations, and termination are all arbitrable.
The case law demonstrates that Singapore tribunals and courts respect contractual entitlements, technical assessments, and performance obligations, making Singapore a leading hub for construction and EPC arbitration in Asia.

comments