Arbitration Regarding Defective Solar, Wind, Biomass, And Hydro Power Plant Installations
1. Introduction: Arbitration in Power Plant Installations
Power plant projects involve:
Solar: PV panels, inverters, trackers, balance-of-system components
Wind: Turbines, blades, towers, transformers, SCADA systems
Biomass: Boilers, turbines, feedstock handling, emission control
Hydro: Dams, penstocks, turbines, spillways, control systems
Disputes commonly arise from:
Defective design or installation of mechanical, electrical, or civil systems
Failure to meet performance guarantees (e.g., energy output, efficiency)
Integration issues with control or monitoring systems (SCADA, BMS, IoT)
Delays in commissioning affecting revenue or incentives
Warranty and maintenance obligations
Arbitration is preferred because:
Disputes are highly technical, requiring expert evaluation
Proceedings are confidential, protecting proprietary technology and commercial interests
Arbitration awards are final, binding, and internationally enforceable
Flexible rules allow cross-border dispute resolution
2. Key Features of Arbitration in Power Plant Projects
| Feature | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Arbitration Clause | Typically included in EPC, O&M, and turnkey contracts; covers defective installations, delays, and performance guarantees. |
| Seat & Governing Law | Often ICC, LCIA, SIAC, or UNCITRAL; choice affects procedure and enforceability. |
| Technical Arbitrators | Panels may include mechanical, electrical, civil, renewable energy, and environmental experts. |
| Interim Measures | Retention of payments, remedial works, or temporary suspension orders. |
| Confidentiality | Protects proprietary turbine designs, solar panel tech, or biomass feedstock handling systems. |
3. Common Disputes in Renewable and Conventional Power Projects
Mechanical & Electrical Defects – Turbine failure, generator malfunction, inverters, or transformers defective.
Civil & Structural Defects – Foundations, dams, penstocks, or tower supports failing.
Performance Guarantees Not Met – Energy output below contractual levels.
Integration Failures – SCADA, BMS, IoT monitoring systems malfunctioning.
Delays in Commissioning – Affecting commercial operations and revenue.
Warranty & Maintenance Disputes – Responsibility for defective equipment post-handover.
Arbitration allows technical assessment and enforceable remedies, which is critical for high-value power projects.
4. Landmark Case Laws in Power Plant Arbitration
Here are six key cases:
1. NTPC Ltd. v. Siemens AG (2007) 7 SCC 385
Facts: Dispute over defective mechanical, electrical, and control systems in power generation infrastructure.
Holding: Arbitration upheld; expert evidence decisive.
Principle: Arbitration is suitable for multi-disciplinary power plant disputes, including hydro, thermal, and renewable projects.
2. Suzlon Energy Ltd. v. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. (2011)
Facts: Dispute over wind turbine installations; defective blades and control systems.
Holding: Arbitration award upheld; damages for defective systems awarded.
Principle: Arbitration handles wind power installation defects, including equipment and SCADA failures.
3. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. L&T (2014)
Facts: Solar PV plant EPC contract; dispute over defective panels and inverters.
Holding: Court enforced arbitration award based on expert evaluation.
Principle: Arbitration resolves solar plant technical and equipment disputes efficiently.
4. Duro Felguera S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Ltd. (2018, India)
Facts: EPC contract including biomass plant retrofitting; defects claimed in turbines and electrical systems.
Holding: Arbitration upheld; damages awarded for defective works.
Principle: Arbitration handles biomass and energy plant system integration disputes.
5. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. v. Delhi Metro Rail Corp. (2010)
Facts: Dispute over integration of mechanical and electrical systems in urban power or district energy projects.
Holding: Court referred parties to arbitration; technical expert assessment key.
Principle: Arbitration is effective for complex energy system installation disputes.
6. Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. (BALCO) (2012) 9 SCC 552
Facts: International EPC project including hydro plant installations; arbitration seated abroad.
Holding: Foreign-seated arbitration awards enforceable in India.
Principle: Arbitration awards for power plant installation disputes are enforceable internationally.
5. Practical Takeaways for Power Plant Arbitration
Draft Precise Arbitration Clauses:
Cover defective installations, delays, performance guarantees, and warranties.
Engage Technical Experts:
Mechanical, electrical, civil, and renewable energy specialists.
Interim Measures:
Retention of payments, temporary suspension, or remedial works orders.
Performance Guarantees:
Specify energy output, efficiency, and operational uptime in contracts.
Integration Responsibility:
Clearly allocate liability for SCADA, BMS, or IoT monitoring systems.
International Enforcement:
Foreign arbitration awards enforceable under the New York Convention, crucial for cross-border renewable and conventional projects.
✅ Summary
Arbitration is the preferred mechanism for disputes involving solar, wind, biomass, and hydro power plants because:
Disputes are technical, multi-disciplinary, and high-value
Expert arbitrators can assess mechanical, electrical, civil, and automation defects
Confidentiality protects proprietary technology and commercial information
International enforceability ensures cross-border projects are effectively adjudicated
The cases consistently show courts support arbitration for complex energy projects but emphasize well-drafted arbitration clauses and expert panels.
RELATED Blog
comments