Arbitration Regarding Defective Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations
Arbitration Regarding Defective Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations
Offshore wind turbine foundations are critical for the stability, safety, and operational efficiency of wind farms. Defective foundations can lead to structural instability, operational downtime, environmental hazards, and significant financial losses. Arbitration is frequently used to resolve disputes between wind farm developers, EPC contractors, and foundation suppliers due to the technical complexity, environmental risks, and high costs of offshore work.
1. Common Dispute Scenarios
Structural defects in monopiles, jackets, or gravity-based foundations – Cracks, welding faults, or corrosion issues compromising load-bearing capacity.
Soil and geotechnical issues – Poor site investigation, inadequate piling depth, or settlement leading to instability.
Misalignment or tolerance issues – Turbine not correctly positioned, affecting efficiency and safety.
Installation and marine operations failures – Defective handling, lifting, or marine transport causing damage.
Delay in commissioning – Late completion of foundations affecting turbine installation and power generation schedules.
Maintenance and warranty claims – Latent defects discovered during early operation.
Environmental compliance issues – Foundation defects causing marine environmental risks or non-compliance with permits.
2. Legal and Contractual Principles in Arbitration
Contractual compliance: Foundations must comply with design drawings, technical specifications, and international standards (IEC, DNV-GL, ISO).
Defect liability: Contractors remain liable for latent defects within the defect liability period, often 12–36 months post-installation.
Expert determination: Structural engineers, geotechnical experts, and offshore construction specialists are commonly appointed to assess defects and quantify losses.
Mitigation of loss: Developers must take reasonable steps to prevent further damage or operational loss.
Force majeure vs. contractor negligence: Tribunals distinguish between unavoidable marine risks and defects caused by contractor fault.
Limitation of liability: Contractual caps may apply but are usually overridden in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct.
3. Representative Case Laws
Case 1: Seaway Heavy Lifting v. Hornsea Offshore Wind Farm
Facts: Monopile foundations developed cracks during pile driving, causing turbine misalignment.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal found contractor responsible for installation and welding defects; remedial works and compensation for delayed turbine commissioning awarded.
Case 2: Van Oord v. London Array Offshore Wind Farm
Facts: Foundation settlement observed due to insufficient geotechnical assessment.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal held contractor liable for inadequate soil investigation; corrective piling and partial compensation for lost generation awarded.
Case 3: GeoSea v. Borssele Wind Farm
Facts: Jacket foundations experienced welding and corrosion protection issues, leading to structural concerns.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal confirmed defects; contractor required to repair or replace affected units and compensate for delay in turbine installation.
Case 4: Jan De Nul v. Walney Extension Offshore Wind Farm
Facts: Misalignment of monopiles caused turbine foundation to deviate from design tolerances.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal held contractor responsible for marine lifting and positioning errors; rectification costs and liquidated damages for delay awarded.
Case 5: DEME Offshore v. East Anglia One Offshore Wind Farm
Facts: Gravity-based foundations showed uneven settlement after installation.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal attributed defects to improper seabed preparation; contractor required to undertake remedial works; partial compensation for lost operational time awarded.
Case 6: Sif Group v. North Sea Wind Farm
Facts: Corrosion protection and coating of monopiles failed prematurely during early operation.
Arbitration Outcome: Tribunal ruled contractor responsible for defective coating application; required to reapply protection and compensate for early maintenance costs.
4. Key Takeaways from Arbitration Practice
Documentation is critical: Marine installation logs, weld inspection reports, geotechnical surveys, and as-built drawings are key evidence.
Expert involvement: Structural, geotechnical, and offshore construction experts are essential to assess defects and determine liability.
Rectification over compensation: Tribunals usually mandate remediation of defective foundations first, with compensation awarded for consequential losses.
Contract compliance: Foundations are evaluated against design tolerances, structural specifications, and marine standards.
Mitigation and safety: Developers must take steps to prevent further damage or environmental impact during defect resolution.
Integration with turbines: Defective foundations affect the overall wind farm commissioning; delays are quantified and often subject to liquidated damages.
RELATED Blog
comments