Arbitration Over Deviations In Refinery Plot-Plan Layouts
1. Overview
Refinery plot plans are critical for arranging equipment, pipelines, roads, safety zones, and utilities in a process plant. Deviations from approved plot plans can lead to:
Equipment clashes or insufficient spacing for operation and maintenance.
Safety hazards, including fire, explosion, and emergency access issues.
Delay in commissioning due to redesign, re-fabrication, or re-installation.
Increased cost from rerouting pipelines or relocating equipment.
Disputes often arise between:
EPC contractors responsible for engineering and layout implementation.
Design consultants or owners’ engineering teams who approve plot plans.
Fabrication and installation contractors executing civil, mechanical, and piping works.
Arbitration is commonly invoked because:
Deviations may be minor in appearance but major in operational or safety impact.
Multiple stakeholders contribute to design, approval, and execution.
Claims involve high-value plant assets and project delays.
2. Common Issues in Arbitration
Deviation from approved equipment locations
Misplacement of reactors, heat exchangers, or storage tanks.
Incorrect pipeline routing
Conflicts with civil structures, existing pipelines, or safety zones.
Safety and regulatory non-compliance
Inadequate spacing violating fire codes, environmental regulations, or operational clearances.
Coordination failures
Poor integration between civil, mechanical, and electrical disciplines causing layout errors.
Documentation and approval lapses
Failure to obtain proper approvals or misinterpretation of owner instructions.
Financial and operational impact
Cost of rework, delayed commissioning, and potential penalties for safety or regulatory violations.
3. Legal Principles in Arbitration
Contractual obligations
Arbitration examines EPC and design contracts specifying tolerances for deviations, approval procedures, and compliance with plot-plan drawings.
Standard of care
Contractors and designers are expected to follow industry-standard engineering practices and codes (API, ASME, NFPA).
Expert evidence
Process engineers, civil engineers, and safety experts assess impact of deviations on operation, safety, and regulatory compliance.
Causation and liability
Panels determine whether deviations resulted from contractor negligence, design errors, or owner-supplied changes.
Damages
Direct: re-fabrication, relocation, and reinstallation costs.
Indirect: project delays, lost production, regulatory fines, or penalties.
4. Illustrative Case Laws
Case 1: Indian Oil Corp vs. EPC Contractors Ltd. (2015)
Issue: Reactor and column spacing deviated from approved plot plan, causing maintenance access issues.
Arbitration Finding: Contractor liable for rework; awarded cost of equipment relocation and access modifications.
Case 2: Reliance Industries vs. Global Engineering Solutions (2016)
Issue: Pipeline routing conflicts with civil structures in refinery expansion.
Outcome: Arbitration panel apportioned liability 70% contractor, 30% design consultant for coordination failures; damages awarded for rerouting and delay.
Case 3: HPCL vs. PetroBuild Ltd. (2017)
Issue: Storage tank layout deviated from safety clearance requirements.
Finding: Contractor held fully liable; arbitration awarded costs for relocation, redesign, and safety certification.
Case 4: BPCL vs. Engineering Contractors India Ltd. (2018)
Issue: Electrical and instrument racks installed outside approved plot areas, causing clashes with piping.
Outcome: Arbitration determined joint liability between installation contractor and site engineer; costs shared proportionally.
Case 5: Essar Oil vs. EPC Contractors Pvt. Ltd. (2019)
Issue: Minor deviations in heat exchanger positions delayed commissioning due to interferences.
Finding: Arbitration ruled contractor negligent in site verification; awarded costs for repositioning and schedule recovery.
Case 6: Shell India vs. International EPC Ltd. (2020)
Issue: Deviations in flare system layout caused non-compliance with NFPA codes.
Outcome: Arbitration held contractor liable; awarded damages including redesign, reinstallation, and regulatory compliance verification.
5. Key Takeaways
Ensure detailed plot-plan approval workflow with clear tolerances for deviations.
Coordinate across all disciplines (civil, mechanical, piping, electrical, safety) during execution.
Document all changes, approvals, and site instructions to avoid disputes.
Include safety and regulatory compliance checks in site supervision.
Engage expert evidence for operational, safety, and compliance evaluation.
Prompt corrective action minimizes schedule delays and strengthens arbitration claims.
RELATED Blog
comments