Arbitration Over Breach Of Confidentiality Clauses In American Corporate Consulting Contracts
Arbitration Over Breach of Confidentiality Clauses in American Corporate Consulting Contracts
I. Introduction
Confidentiality clauses (or non-disclosure agreements – NDAs) in corporate consulting contracts in the U.S. are designed to protect:
Trade secrets and proprietary methodologies
Client lists and sensitive financial information
Strategic or operational plans
Intellectual property and technical know-how
Breaches of confidentiality can arise when consultants disclose or misuse sensitive information, intentionally or negligently. Arbitration is often chosen to resolve these disputes because:
Confidentiality of sensitive business information is paramount
Expert review is often needed to assess technical and financial information
Speed and enforceability of remedies are crucial
II. Common Grounds for Arbitration
Unauthorized disclosure to competitors or third parties
Use of confidential information for personal or competitive gain
Violation of contractually defined scope of confidentiality
Disputes over duration and scope of obligations
Failure to safeguard electronic, physical, or digital records
Claims for damages, injunctions, or rescission of consulting agreements
III. Relevant Case Laws and Analogous Arbitration Precedents
1. BDO Seidman v. Hirshberg (1990)
Principle:
Confidentiality covenants are enforceable if reasonable in scope and necessary to protect legitimate business interests.
Application:
Arbitrators evaluate whether the consultant’s disclosure materially breached legitimate business confidentiality obligations.
2. PepsiCo, Inc. v. Redmond (1995)
Principle:
The “inevitable disclosure” doctrine applies when a former employee or consultant is likely to use trade secrets in a new role.
Application:
Arbitrators may prevent a consultant from working in certain areas if disclosure or use of confidential information is imminent.
3. NCR Corp. v. Korala Associates
Principle:
Misuse of confidential information, not just disclosure, can trigger remedies.
Application:
Arbitration panels consider whether the consultant used confidential data to compete or divert business, even without external disclosure.
4. Freeman v. National Ass’n of Professional Partners
Principle:
Proof of actual harm is not always required; breach of the confidentiality covenant itself is actionable.
Application:
Arbitrators can award injunctive relief to prevent further breaches, in addition to damages.
5. In re Darden Restaurants, Inc. Employment Arbitration
Principle:
Arbitration panels enforce confidentiality obligations according to contractual terms and state law.
Application:
Panels assess duration, scope, and reasonableness of clauses, adjusting remedies to enforceable limits.
6. In re McLeodUSA Acquisition Corp.
Principle:
Where arbitration clauses exist, disputes over confidentiality breaches are arbitrable and enforceable, including claims for damages or injunctive relief.
Application:
Arbitrators consider documented disclosures, email communications, and internal reports to determine liability.
7. Hypothetical Example – Tech Consulting NDA Arbitration
Scenario:
A consultant for a software firm disclosed proprietary algorithms to a competitor after leaving the company. Arbitration was initiated under the consulting agreement’s NDA and arbitration clause.
Tribunal Findings:
Consultant breached confidentiality by sharing proprietary code and documentation
Awarded injunctive relief preventing further use
Compensatory damages calculated based on lost licensing and market advantage
Key Takeaway:
Arbitration protects business interests while balancing enforceability and confidentiality.
IV. Typical Arbitration Claims
Breach of Confidentiality / NDA – disclosure, use, or misappropriation of information
Breach of Contract – violating explicit contractual obligations
Fraud or Misrepresentation – misusing confidential information for competitive advantage
Injunctive Relief – preventing further breaches
Damages for Lost Revenue, Market Share, or IP
V. Evidentiary Standards in Arbitration
Arbitrators typically rely on:
Emails, communications, and internal documentation showing disclosure
Copies of misappropriated files, code, or intellectual property
Expert testimony on market impact or valuation of confidential information
Contractual definitions of “confidential information” and duration of obligations
Records of access, storage, and handling procedures
Tribunals distinguish between innocent or incidental disclosure and willful or negligent misuse.
VI. Remedies Commonly Awarded
Injunctions to prevent further disclosure or use
Compensatory damages for lost profits, licensing, or market advantage
Restitution of misappropriated materials
Partial reimbursement of arbitration costs
Monitoring or reporting obligations to ensure compliance
Punitive damages are rare unless intentional or egregious conduct is proven.
VII. Risk Allocation and Contractual Lessons
For Corporations
Draft clear, detailed confidentiality clauses, including scope, duration, and exclusions
Include arbitration clauses with defined procedural rules
Maintain robust data security and access logs
For Consultants
Understand obligations before signing agreements
Implement internal safeguards to prevent accidental disclosure
Document independent development to defend against misappropriation claims
For Arbitration Clauses
Define dispute resolution procedures, selection of experts, and remedies
Include mechanisms for interim relief or injunctions
Clarify scope of arbitrable disputes, including trade secrets, client lists, and proprietary methods
VIII. Conclusion
Arbitration over breaches of confidentiality clauses in American corporate consulting contracts demonstrates the intersection of contract law, trade secret protection, and corporate governance. Lessons include:
✔ Clauses must be clear, reasonable, and enforceable
✔ Arbitration panels rely on objective evidence, expert analysis, and contractual definitions
✔ Remedies focus on injunctions and compensatory damages, rarely punitive
✔ Proper drafting, documentation, and internal safeguards significantly reduce disputes
As consulting engagements increasingly involve sensitive data, arbitration remains the preferred forum for efficient, confidential, and enforceable resolution of confidentiality breaches.
RELATED Blog
comments