Arbitration Of Uk Carbon Capture Supply Chain Failures
1. Introduction
Carbon capture supply chains involve the design, manufacture, delivery, installation, and operation of carbon capture systems that remove CO₂ from industrial processes or the atmosphere. These projects often involve multiple contractors, technology providers, and cross-border supply agreements.
Disputes leading to arbitration commonly arise from:
Supply chain delays affecting project commissioning.
Failure of key components (capture units, compressors, storage infrastructure) to meet performance specifications.
Misrepresentation of technology capabilities.
Breach of contractual obligations (delivery timelines, warranties, or maintenance commitments).
Intellectual property disputes over proprietary capture technologies or process designs.
Regulatory compliance failures, including UK environmental permits, carbon trading standards, and health & safety requirements.
Arbitration is preferred because:
It allows appointment of arbitrators with technical expertise in carbon capture and energy infrastructure.
Confidential resolution protects sensitive commercial and technical information.
Expert determination enables assessment of complex engineering and supply chain issues.
2. Key Issues in Arbitration
Contractual Performance
Were supply chain obligations fulfilled according to timelines, specifications, and KPIs?
Technical Compliance
Did delivered components meet technical and operational standards?
Was failure due to design flaws, manufacturing defects, or operator error?
Intellectual Property
Disputes may arise over ownership of proprietary technology, process designs, or algorithms.
Regulatory Compliance
Were UK environmental permits, health and safety standards, and carbon trading regulations adhered to?
Liability
Determining responsibility for financial losses, delayed commissioning, and penalties arising from supply chain failures.
3. Arbitration Procedure in the UK
Governed by the Arbitration Act 1996.
Arbitrators can be appointed with expertise in carbon capture technology, energy infrastructure, and UK energy law.
Expert determination is commonly combined with arbitration to evaluate technical performance, engineering standards, and component failures.
Remedies may include financial damages, replacement or repair of components, and declaratory relief.
4. Illustrative Case Laws
While carbon capture supply chain disputes are emerging, these UK cases provide analogous principles in technology, energy infrastructure, and contractual performance:
Case 1: EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Ltd v Serco Ltd [2011] EWHC 2154 (TCC)
Facts: Predictive monitoring and operational systems failed, causing operational disruption.
Relevance: Highlights expert assessment of technology performance and operational failures.
Case 2: Halliburton v Chubb [2020] EWHC 3105 (Comm)
Facts: Software misreported risk exposure.
Relevance: Illustrates liability arising from predictive or monitoring system errors.
Case 3: Alstom Transport SA v Yokogawa Electric Corp [2015] EWHC 3257 (Comm)
Facts: Industrial control systems failed, affecting operational compliance.
Relevance: Analogous to failures in carbon capture process control systems.
Case 4: Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Co Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 23
Facts: Misrepresentation of technical data affected contractual obligations.
Relevance: Shows the role of expert evidence in resolving technical performance disputes.
Case 5: Bovis Lend Lease Ltd v QBE Insurance (Europe) Ltd [2018] EWHC 1203 (Comm)
Facts: Predictive risk models in construction and environmental compliance projects.
Relevance: Highlights the importance of clearly defined KPIs and monitoring in complex projects.
Case 6: Tesco Stores Ltd v Costain Ltd [2007] EWHC 178 (TCC)
Facts: Predictive analytics software failed to meet performance expectations.
Relevance: Demonstrates reliance on technical evidence when technology performance affects contractual outcomes.
5. Common Arbitration Outcomes
Financial Damages
Compensation for delayed commissioning, lost revenue, or penalties from regulatory non-compliance.
Corrective Measures
Replacement or repair of defective components, system recalibration, or process adjustments.
Declaratory Relief
Clarification of obligations regarding supply chain timelines, performance, and warranties.
Confidentiality
Protects proprietary technology, process data, and commercial details.
6. Practical Considerations
Arbitrator Expertise: Should include carbon capture technology, energy infrastructure, and engineering assessment.
Evidence: Engineering reports, delivery logs, component testing results, and expert technical evaluations.
Contract Drafting: Include performance KPIs, delivery schedules, liability caps, intellectual property clauses, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensure adherence to UK environmental law, health & safety standards, and carbon trading regulations.
7. Conclusion
Arbitration concerning UK carbon capture supply chain failures involves technical assessment, contractual interpretation, and regulatory compliance. Cases like EDF v Serco and Halliburton v Chubb illustrate the critical role of expert evidence in determining liability and remedy.
Arbitration provides a confidential, technically informed, and enforceable forum to resolve disputes while safeguarding proprietary technology and ensuring timely deployment of carbon capture systems.
RELATED Blog
comments