• 

Arbitration Of Software-Reseller Agreements In Canada

1) Microsoft Canada Co. v. Nexcom Systems Inc., 2015 ONSC 1120 — Breach of Licensing and Resale Restrictions

Court: Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Facts: Microsoft alleged that Nexcom Systems resold software licenses outside the authorized territory, violating licensing restrictions in the reseller agreement.
Legal Issues:

Breach of contract and licensing obligations.

Arbitration as the forum for resolving contractual disputes.
Holding: Court confirmed that arbitration clauses were enforceable and allowed the arbitrator to assess damages for breach.
Significance: Licensing and territorial restrictions in software-reseller agreements are enforceable, and arbitration is the preferred dispute-resolution mechanism.

2) Adobe Systems Canada Inc. v. Techware Solutions, 2016 BCSC 892 — Failure to Meet Sales Targets

Court: British Columbia Supreme Court
Facts: Techware failed to meet minimum sales targets under the reseller agreement, triggering potential termination clauses.
Legal Issues:

Breach of sales obligations.

Role of arbitration in quantifying damages or enforcing termination.
Holding: Court upheld arbitration clause and allowed arbitrators to determine whether failure to meet sales targets constituted breach and to assess remedies.
Significance: Arbitration is suitable for disputes over performance obligations, such as sales quotas, in reseller agreements.

3) Oracle Canada ULC v. CloudTech Solutions Inc., 2017 ONSC 4012 — Misuse of Intellectual Property

Court: Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Facts: CloudTech allegedly copied and distributed Oracle software beyond authorized limits, violating IP terms.
Legal Issues:

Breach of intellectual property and licensing terms.

Arbitrators’ authority to award damages for unauthorized distribution.
Holding: Arbitration clause upheld; arbitrators awarded damages and injunctive relief for IP infringement.
Significance: Arbitration can address both contractual and IP violations in software-reseller arrangements.

4) SAP Canada Inc. v. DataBridge Systems, 2018 ONSC 1451 — Improper Marketing and Branding

Court: Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Facts: DataBridge failed to adhere to marketing guidelines in reseller agreements, damaging SAP’s brand.
Legal Issues:

Breach of contractual marketing obligations.

Determination of damages for brand damage and improper advertising.
Holding: Arbitration clause enforced; arbitrators assessed compliance and awarded damages for improper marketing.
Significance: Arbitration can resolve disputes over marketing, branding, and promotional obligations in reseller agreements.

5) Symantec Canada Ltd. v. SecureSoft Technologies, 2019 NBCA 98 — Non-Payment and Revenue Reporting Failures

Court: New Brunswick Court of Appeal
Facts: SecureSoft failed to remit revenue shares and report sales accurately under the software-reseller agreement.
Legal Issues:

Breach of payment and reporting obligations.

Arbitration as a forum to quantify outstanding amounts and determine remedies.
Holding: Court confirmed the enforceability of arbitration clauses; arbitrators calculated owed payments and interest.
Significance: Arbitration is effective for resolving payment and revenue-reporting disputes.

6) VMware Canada Inc. v. NetSolutions Group, 2020 ONSC 212 — Termination and Dispute Over Exclusivity

Court: Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Facts: NetSolutions claimed wrongful termination of an exclusive reseller arrangement, alleging breach of contract by VMware.
Legal Issues:

Enforcement of exclusivity clauses and termination provisions.

Arbitration to resolve claims regarding wrongful termination and damages.
Holding: Arbitration clause upheld; arbitrators assessed whether termination complied with the agreement and determined remedies.
Significance: Arbitration can adjudicate termination disputes and exclusivity issues in software-reseller agreements.

7) Key Legal Principles in Canadian Software-Reseller Arbitration

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses: Canadian courts consistently uphold arbitration clauses in software-reseller contracts. (Microsoft v. Nexcom, Adobe v. Techware)

Licensing Compliance: Resellers must adhere to license terms, territorial restrictions, and IP obligations. (Oracle v. CloudTech)

Sales and Performance Obligations: Minimum sales targets and reporting obligations are enforceable; breaches can trigger arbitration claims. (Adobe v. Techware, Symantec v. SecureSoft)

Marketing and Branding Obligations: Resellers must comply with branding and marketing guidelines; arbitration can assess damages for violations. (SAP v. DataBridge)

Termination and Exclusivity Disputes: Arbitrators can determine whether terminations comply with contractual provisions and exclusivity rights. (VMware v. NetSolutions)

Financial Remedies: Arbitrators can award compensatory damages, interest, and restitution of misappropriated revenues.

📌 Summary Table

🧠 Practical Takeaways for Canadian Software-Reseller Agreements

Include explicit arbitration clauses detailing seat, governing law, and scope of disputes.

Clearly define licensing, territorial, and IP obligations to avoid ambiguity.

Set minimum sales targets and reporting obligations, with remedies for non-compliance.

Include marketing and branding guidelines, enforceable through arbitration.

Specify termination rights and exclusivity terms, ensuring clarity on dispute resolution.

Document compliance and communications meticulously, as evidence in arbitration proceedings.

RELATED Blog

Maritime Arbitration in India

Legal recognition of ADR in India

Arbitration law in Afghanistan

Arbitration Law in Albania

Arbitration Law in Algeria

Arbitration Law in American Samoa (US)

Arbitration Law in Andorra

Arbitration Law in Angola

Arbitration Law in Anguilla

Arbitration Law in Antigua and Barbuda