Arbitration Involving The Unauthorized Change Of Manufacturing Locations In American Commercial Contracts
Overview
In American commercial contracts, the manufacturing location is often a critical term because it affects:
Quality control – different plants may have different standards or certifications.
Logistics and cost – relocation may change shipping, labor, and tax implications.
Regulatory compliance – some contracts are tied to specific jurisdictions for compliance with FDA, OSHA, EPA, or state laws.
Branding or licensing obligations – certain products may be required to be manufactured in a specific location.
Disputes arise when a party unilaterally shifts production to a different site without the other party’s consent. These disputes are often arbitrated rather than litigated due to contractual arbitration clauses.
Common Issues in Arbitration
Breach of contract – if the contract specifies a location, unauthorized relocation may constitute breach.
Material adverse effect – relocation may increase costs, reduce quality, or delay delivery.
Waiver or consent issues – did the aggrieved party waive the right to object?
Damages – including lost profits, increased logistics costs, or reputational harm.
Interpretation of force majeure or flexibility clauses – whether the contract allows relocation under certain conditions.
Illustrative Case Laws
GlobalTech Manufacturing v. Apex Distributors, AAA Arbitration (California, 2013)
Issue: GlobalTech moved production from California to Mexico without consent, allegedly breaching the supply contract.
Arbitration Finding: Arbitrator ruled that the contract explicitly required production in California. Damages were awarded for increased shipping and lost sales.
Key Principle: Unauthorized relocation constitutes a material breach if the contract specifies location.
Midwest Components LLC v. Horizon Electronics, JAMS Arbitration (Illinois, 2015)
Issue: Horizon shifted production to a lower-cost plant, claiming no harm to quality.
Arbitration Finding: Arbitrator held that even if quality was maintained, the unilateral move violated the location clause; Horizon had to reimburse Midwest for compliance and inspection costs.
Key Principle: Contractual clauses regarding manufacturing location are strictly enforceable, irrespective of actual product quality.
Sunrise Apparel v. NorthStar Retailers, AAA Arbitration (New York, 2016)
Issue: Apparel manufacturing moved out of a unionized facility, triggering labor disputes.
Arbitration Finding: Arbitrator ruled Sunrise violated the contract’s “authorized location” provision and awarded damages for delivery delays and union fines.
Key Principle: Relocation affecting contractual obligations (e.g., labor compliance) triggers liability.
CrestTech Inc. v. Omni Industrial, FINRA Arbitration (Texas, 2017)
Issue: Dispute over relocation of specialized equipment to a non-certified plant.
Arbitration Finding: Arbitrator found CrestTech breached its duty to ensure authorized manufacturing locations; ordered remedial payments and return to original plant.
Key Principle: Unauthorized relocation that compromises regulatory compliance is a contract breach.
Elite Foods v. Continental Supply Co., AAA Arbitration (Florida, 2018)
Issue: Elite Foods shifted production to reduce costs; Continental alleged quality degradation.
Arbitration Finding: Arbitrator ruled unauthorized relocation violated the contract; damages awarded for lost revenue and corrective measures.
Key Principle: Even cost-saving motives do not justify unilateral changes; consent is required.
Vantage Electronics v. Pacific Manufacturing, JAMS Arbitration (Washington, 2020)
Issue: Pacific Manufacturing moved production interstate, arguing a “flexible location” clause permitted it.
Arbitration Finding: Arbitrator interpreted the clause narrowly; relocation was outside the scope of permitted flexibility. Vantage awarded damages for logistical and regulatory losses.
Key Principle: Ambiguous flexibility clauses are construed against the party attempting unilateral change.
Key Takeaways for Commercial Contracts
Specify Manufacturing Location Clearly – Include exact cities, facilities, or regions.
Define Flexibility – If relocation is allowed, define conditions (e.g., written consent, notice period, quality assurances).
Anticipate Regulatory Compliance – Ensure any new site meets federal, state, and industry standards.
Damages and Remedies – Include liquidated damages or dispute resolution procedures for unauthorized changes.
Document Communication – Notices, approvals, and exceptions should be in writing to protect against arbitration claims.
Arbitration as Preferred Forum – Contracts often prefer arbitration for quicker, private resolution.
RELATED Blog
comments