Arbitration Involving Defective Port Dredging, Reclamation, And Terminal Works
1. Introduction
Port construction projects—including dredging, land reclamation, and terminal development—are technically complex and capital-intensive. Defects often lead to disputes because of:
Poor quality of civil and marine works.
Non-compliance with contract specifications.
Delays affecting operational readiness.
Safety and environmental concerns.
Arbitration is widely preferred because:
Technical issues require expert evaluation.
Faster resolution than courts.
Confidential handling of commercially sensitive information.
2. Common Causes of Arbitration Disputes
A. Dredging Works
Underperformance: Inadequate depth or slope not meeting design requirements.
Siltation: Faster-than-expected sedimentation due to incorrect dredging techniques.
Equipment malfunction: Cutter suction dredgers or trailing suction hopper dredgers failing.
Environmental non-compliance: Violation of coastal regulations.
B. Reclamation Works
Foundation instability: Poor compaction leading to settlement.
Material defects: Substandard sand, rock, or fill material.
Design flaws: Incorrect slope, retaining structures, or drainage.
C. Terminal Construction
Structural defects: Cracks or settlement in berths, quays, or quay walls.
Mechanical/electrical issues: Faulty cargo handling cranes or conveyor systems.
Substandard finishing: Pavements, bollards, fenders, or lighting not meeting specs.
3. Arbitration Process in Defective Port Works
Step 1: Reference to Arbitration
Disputes usually arise under EPC contracts or marine civil contracts with arbitration clauses.
Arbitrators often include civil engineers or marine experts.
Step 2: Submission of Claims
Claimant submits defect reports, survey data, hydrographic reports, and cost estimates.
Respondent submits counter-reports or justifications (e.g., natural sedimentation, improper use).
Step 3: Expert Determination
Independent marine surveyors, geotechnical experts, or civil engineers inspect the works.
Testing methods: bathymetric surveys, soil compaction tests, pile integrity tests, etc.
Step 4: Contractual and Legal Analysis
EPC contracts define defect liability, liquidated damages, and warranties.
Tribunal evaluates compliance with technical specifications and environmental norms.
Step 5: Arbitral Award
Remedies can include:
Rectification or re-dredging at contractor’s cost.
Reconstruction or strengthening of reclaimed areas or terminal structures.
Compensation for delay in operational readiness.
Payment of expert and arbitration costs.
4. Key Case Laws Involving Defective Port Works
Case 1: Cochin Port Trust v. M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd.
Issue: Defective dredging and quay wall settlement.
Held: Contractor held liable for rectification and damages for operational delay. Tribunal emphasized adherence to design specifications and hydrographic surveys.
Case 2: Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT) v. M/s Hyundai Engineering
Issue: Defective terminal pavement and fender system installation.
Held: Tribunal awarded repair costs; defects attributed to poor material and workmanship.
Case 3: Paradip Port Trust v. M/s Gammon India Ltd.
Issue: Dredging depth not meeting contract specifications causing vessel draft restrictions.
Held: Contractor liable for re-dredging and delay compensation; hydrographic reports were key evidence.
Case 4: Kandla Port Trust v. M/s Simplex Infrastructures Ltd.
Issue: Reclamation settlement leading to structural cracks in terminal yard.
Held: Contractor directed to stabilize reclaimed land and repair damaged structures; costs awarded under defect liability clause.
Case 5: Chennai Port Trust v. M/s Hindustan Construction Co.
Issue: Defective quay wall and fender installation, causing berthing inefficiency.
Held: Tribunal held contractor responsible; rectification and liquidated damages ordered.
Case 6: Visakhapatnam Port Trust v. M/s Dredging Corp. of India
Issue: Inadequate dredging and sedimentation control causing operational disruption.
Held: Contractor required to conduct remedial dredging; compensation awarded for loss of operational revenue.
Case 7: Mumbai Port Trust v. M/s IVRCL Ltd.
Issue: Defective reclamation work and retaining wall failure.
Held: Arbitral award required reconstruction and strict adherence to technical standards; expert surveyor evidence was decisive.
5. Key Learnings and Best Practices
Technical Compliance
Ensure dredging depth, slope, and reclaimed material meet contract specifications.
Use independent surveyors to verify work quality.
Contractual Clarity
Specify defect liability period, liquidated damages, and testing protocols.
Documentation
Maintain hydrographic survey reports, soil compaction tests, and structural inspection reports.
Expert Involvement
Engage marine engineers, geotechnical experts, and surveyors in arbitration proceedings.
Environmental & Regulatory Compliance
Ensure all dredging, reclamation, and terminal works comply with coastal, port, and environmental regulations.
RELATED Blog
comments