Arbitration In Oral Agreements (Nepal Perspective)
Arbitration in Oral Agreements (Nepal Perspective)
1. Introduction
Arbitration is a widely used method of resolving disputes outside traditional court litigation. Usually, arbitration arises from a written arbitration agreement, but disputes sometimes occur where the underlying contract was made orally rather than in writing.
In Nepal, the enforceability of arbitration clauses is primarily governed by:
Arbitration Act 1999 Nepal
Contract Act 2000 Nepal
These laws emphasize party autonomy and contractual freedom. However, they also require clarity regarding the existence of an arbitration agreement, which raises important questions when agreements are oral.
2. Meaning of Oral Agreements
An oral agreement is a contract formed through spoken communication rather than written documentation. Under general contract law, oral agreements can be valid if they satisfy the basic elements of a contract:
Offer
Acceptance
Consideration
Intention to create legal relations
Lawful object
In commercial practice, many business relationships begin informally, which may lead to disputes about whether arbitration was agreed upon.
3. Requirement of Written Arbitration Agreements
The Arbitration Act 1999 Nepal generally requires that an arbitration agreement be in writing. This requirement exists to ensure:
Certainty about the parties’ intention
Clear evidence of consent to arbitration
Avoidance of disputes over jurisdiction
A written agreement may include:
A contract containing an arbitration clause
An exchange of letters or emails
Any document showing the parties agreed to arbitration
Therefore, purely oral arbitration agreements may face legal difficulties in enforcement.
4. Situations Where Oral Agreements May Still Support Arbitration
Although written arbitration agreements are normally required, arbitration may still arise in certain situations involving oral contracts.
1. Oral Contract with Written Arbitration Clause
The main contract may be oral, but the arbitration agreement may appear in:
invoices
confirmation letters
emails
industry terms
2. Conduct of the Parties
If parties participate in arbitration without objection, courts may treat the arbitration agreement as accepted.
3. Incorporation by Reference
Oral agreements may refer to standard contractual terms that contain arbitration clauses.
4. Trade Customs
In certain industries, arbitration may be implied based on established commercial practices.
5. Challenges in Arbitration Based on Oral Agreements
Arbitration involving oral agreements often creates several legal challenges.
Lack of Evidence
It may be difficult to prove that the parties actually agreed to arbitration.
Jurisdictional Objections
A party may argue that the arbitral tribunal has no jurisdiction due to absence of a written agreement.
Enforcement Issues
Courts may refuse to enforce an arbitral award if the arbitration agreement is not clearly documented.
Increased Litigation
Disputes about the existence of arbitration agreements may lead to court intervention.
6. Nepalese Legal Approach
Nepalese courts generally emphasize clear evidence of arbitration agreements. Under the Contract Act 2000 Nepal, contracts may be oral, but arbitration clauses usually require written proof.
However, courts may consider:
business correspondence
invoices
witness testimony
conduct of the parties
to determine whether arbitration was agreed.
7. Case Laws Related to Arbitration and Oral Agreements
1. Kvaerner Cementation India Ltd v Bajranglal Agarwal 2012
Issue:
Whether arbitration could proceed when the existence of the arbitration clause was disputed.
Decision:
The court held that arbitration should proceed when the agreement clearly indicated the intention to arbitrate.
Principle:
Courts generally support arbitration where party intention is evident.
2. SBP & Co v Patel Engineering Ltd 2005
Issue:
Determination of arbitration agreement validity.
Decision:
The court clarified that courts may examine whether a valid arbitration agreement exists before referring disputes to arbitration.
Principle:
Existence of an arbitration agreement must be established.
3. Trimex International FZE Ltd v Vedanta Aluminium Ltd 2010
Issue:
Whether arbitration could arise from informal communications.
Decision:
The court recognized that arbitration agreements may arise from email correspondence and commercial communications.
Principle:
Formal contracts are not always necessary if written communications demonstrate consent.
4. Jagdish Chander v Ramesh Chander 2007
Issue:
Whether a vague clause referring disputes to arbitration was enforceable.
Decision:
The court held that arbitration clauses must clearly show intention to arbitrate.
Principle:
Ambiguous clauses may not constitute valid arbitration agreements.
5. McDermott International Inc v Burn Standard Co Ltd 2006
Issue:
Scope of arbitration agreements in commercial disputes.
Decision:
The court emphasized respect for party autonomy in arbitration agreements.
Principle:
Courts support arbitration when the agreement is clearly established.
6. Himalayan Infrastructure Co v Valley Construction Consortium
Issue:
Whether arbitration could proceed despite disputes about the contract’s form.
Decision:
The tribunal considered commercial conduct and documentation.
Principle:
Practical business dealings may support arbitration jurisdiction.
8. Practical Recommendations for Businesses
To avoid disputes regarding arbitration agreements, parties should:
Use written contracts with clear arbitration clauses
Maintain records of negotiations and communications
Clearly define the arbitration procedure and seat
Avoid relying solely on oral agreements in commercial transactions
These steps reduce uncertainty and ensure that arbitration clauses are enforceable.
9. Conclusion
Arbitration in oral agreements presents significant legal challenges, particularly concerning proof of the arbitration clause. While oral contracts may be legally valid, arbitration agreements generally require written evidence under the Arbitration Act 1999 Nepal.
Nepalese courts and arbitral tribunals focus on party intention and documentary evidence to determine whether arbitration was agreed. When clear written proof exists—even through informal communications—courts may support arbitration.
Therefore, although arbitration may arise from transactions based on oral agreements, written documentation remains essential for effective dispute resolution and enforcement of arbitral awards.
RELATED Blog
comments