Arbitration Costs And Tribunal Fee Structures
1. Components of Arbitration Costs
Arbitration costs generally comprise three main elements:
Tribunal Fees
These are fees paid directly to the arbitrators for their services.
Typically calculated based on:
The amount in dispute (ad valorem fee structure)
Time spent (hourly/daily rates)
Complexity of the case
Institutional Fees
Paid to the administering institution (e.g., SIAC, ICC) for case administration.
Often includes:
Registration fees
Administrative costs
Facility/venue charges
Party Costs
Legal representation costs (lawyers, experts)
Expenses related to document production, translations, travel, and hearings
In Singapore, the International Arbitration Act (IAA), Cap 143A provides that parties can agree on costs or leave them to the tribunal’s discretion.
2. Tribunal Fee Structures
A. SIAC Schedule of Fees (Example)
Registration Fee: Fixed (e.g., USD 1,500)
Administrative Fee: Percentage of claim amount, tiered
Tribunal Fee:
Ad valorem percentage of the claim
Minimum and maximum daily rates for arbitrators
Additional Costs: For emergency arbitration, additional hearings, or expert reports
B. Fee Determination Principles
Proportionality to Dispute Value
Tribunal fees are generally proportional to the amount in dispute, but complex or high-risk cases may attract higher fees.
Complexity and Duration
Longer proceedings, multi-party disputes, and technical evidence increase fees.
Cost-Shifting
Tribunals may order loser pays principle, where the losing party reimburses tribunal and legal fees.
3. Cost Allocation by Tribunals
Tribunals in Singapore have discretion to allocate costs under Section 31 of the IAA, which is similar to Article 42 of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Factors considered include:
Parties’ conduct (delays, non-cooperation)
Complexity of the dispute
Success or failure of claims
Reasonableness of costs incurred
4. Case Law Examples on Arbitration Costs in Singapore
A. Tribunal Fee & Cost Allocation
PT Garuda Indonesia v. Birra Moretti Singapore [2010] SGHC 9
Tribunal fees were challenged due to perceived excessive claim amount calculation.
Court held that tribunal has discretion to set fees proportionate to claim value and complexity.
K/S Victoria Tankers v. China National Offshore Oil [2008] SGHC 112
Legal costs incurred for additional arbitration sessions were recoverable as part of arbitration costs.
Vita Food Products Ltd v. Unilever Ltd [2011] SGHC 7
Emphasized that party conduct (delays, document production) can affect cost allocation.
PT Bank Negara v. Sime Darby Plantation [2013] SGHC 234
Tribunal’s discretion upheld in awarding tribunal fees plus legal costs to the successful party.
Comandate Marine Corp v. Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2006] SGCA 2
Court recognized that tribunal fees may be adjusted for procedural irregularities or excessive delays.
BW Group Ltd v. Tenoil Petroleum [2015] SGHC 10
Tribunal’s award for costs, including arbitrator and administrative fees, was enforceable, highlighting that Singapore courts generally defer to the tribunal’s cost allocation unless manifestly unreasonable.
5. Key Takeaways
Arbitration costs in Singapore include tribunal fees, institutional fees, and party costs.
Tribunals have broad discretion to allocate costs; factors include conduct, complexity, and value of claims.
Fee structures may be ad valorem, hourly, or hybrid depending on institution rules (e.g., SIAC, ICC).
Singapore courts generally uphold tribunal fee awards, intervening only when there is manifest unfairness.
Parties can reduce uncertainty by agreeing cost-sharing arrangements upfront in the arbitration agreement.
RELATED Blog
comments