Arbitration Concerning Indonesian Waste Conveyor Belt Installations
📌 Arbitration in Indonesian Waste Conveyor Belt Installation Contracts
Industrial installations — such as waste conveyor belts used for transfer of municipal/industrial waste, recycling systems, or waste-to-energy plants — involve complex engineering, tight deadlines, phased payments, and technical performance specifications. Disputes arise when:
Delivery/installation is delayed
Work quality fails tests
Payment is withheld or disputed
Change orders or scope expansions occur
Site conditions differ from expectations
Force majeure events interrupt work
Arbitration is often chosen instead of litigation because it offers:
✔ Neutral forum
✔ Technical expertise among arbitrators
✔ Confidentiality
✔ Easier cross-border enforcement (New York Convention)
1) Typical Arbitration Clause in Installation Agreements
A strong arbitration clause for conveyor belt installation might read:
“All disputes arising out of or relating to this Contract, including validity, performance, breach, termination, or enforceability, shall be finally resolved by arbitration under the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) Rules. The seat of arbitration shall be Singapore and the governing law shall be Singapore law.”
Key elements:
Seat of arbitration — determines procedural law
Governing law — decides substantive contract interpretation
Number of arbitrators — typically one or three
Arbitration rules — SIAC, ICC, UNCITRAL, etc.
2) How Arbitration Proceedings Unfold
a) Initiation
Claimant serves a Notice of Arbitration
Tribunal is constituted (each party selects an arbitrator; presiding arbitrator chosen by institution)
b) Pleadings
Statement of Claim and Defence
Technical exhibits, performance data, installation logs
c) Hearings
Witness evidence (project managers, engineers)
Expert testimony (mechanical, electrical, civil, finance)
d) Award
Final binding decision
Can include damages, interest, costs
e) Enforcement
Award enforced via courts under the 1958 New York Convention
Indonesian courts generally recognize foreign awards unless narrow public-policy exceptions apply
3) Common Contractual Issues in Conveyors Projects
| Issue | Example Dispute |
|---|---|
| Delay | Contractor misses agreed timelines; liquidated damages due |
| Performance | Conveyor fails load tests or speed specifications |
| Variations | Extra work without price/time adjustment |
| Payment | Owner withholds final payment due to alleged defects |
| Change in Law | New safety regulations mid-project |
| Force Majeure | Pandemic or port closures disrupt supply |
⚖️ Six Relevant Arbitration & Court Decisions
Below cases illustrate key legal principles that commonly arise in infrastructure and mechanical installation arbitration. While not all involve conveyor belts specifically, each applies directly to issues found in conveyor installation disputes.
1) Dallah Real Estate & Tourism Holding Company v. The Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Government of Pakistan
Key Principle: Consent to arbitrate must be clear.
Issue: Whether a third party was bound by an arbitration agreement.
Holding: Arbitration agreement not validly concluded; award set aside.
Lesson for conveyor contracts: Make sure arbitration clauses are properly signed and binding on all contracting parties.
2) Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Key Principle: Arbitration clauses in international contracts are enforceable.
Issue: Enforceability of arbitration clause under U.S. law.
Holding: Arbitration provision upheld even in complex, multi-issue commercial contract.
Lesson: Even detailed claims (delay, defects, costs) are arbitrable if clause is clear.
3) ICC Case: Delay and Liquidated Damages (General Construction Arbitrations)
Key Principle: Liquidated damages enforceable if not penal.
Issue: Contractor delays major equipment delivery.
Holding: Tribunal upheld liquidated damages where clause was reasonable and related to estimated losses.
Lesson: In conveyor belt projects, carefully negotiate delay damages.
4) ICC Force Majeure Award (Pandemic/Ports Disruption)
Key Principle: Strict proof required for force majeure relief.
Issue: Supplier claimed inability to perform due to global supply chain shutdown.
Holding: Tribunal denied relief where supplier could have mitigated or alternatives existed.
Lesson: Define force majeure specifically and document impacts.
5) English Court — Enforcing Foreign Arbitration Awards (Public Policy Exception)
Key Principle: Public policy grounds for refusing enforcement are narrow.
Issue: Enforcement of a foreign award challenged on public policy.
Holding: Court refused to disturb award except for manifest violations.
Lesson: Awards in conveyor installation disputes are generally enforceable unless exceptional circumstances arise.
6) Indonesian Supreme Court — Referral to Arbitration
Key Principle: Indonesian courts respect valid arbitration clauses.
Issue: Party attempted to litigate despite arbitration clause.
Holding: Supreme Court mandates referral to arbitration if agreement exists.
Lesson: In Indonesia, courts will consistently deflect to arbitration when clause is present.
📌 Legal Principles Applied to Conveyor Belt Installation Arbitration
| Issue | Applicable Principle |
|---|---|
| Arbitrability | Infrastructure and mechanical disputes are arbitrable |
| Tribunal Jurisdiction | Tribunal decides own jurisdiction (kompetenz-kompetenz) |
| Governing Law | Contractual governing law guides substantive rights |
| Evidence | Technical and performance evidence is critical |
| Interim Measures | Tribunals can order security/inspections |
| Costs & Interest | Awards commonly include costs and post-award interest |
🧠 Practical Considerations for Waste Conveyor Projects
A. Draft Clear Specifications
Include:
Conveyor capacity and speed
Belt type and materials
Environmental conditions
Acceptance and performance tests
B. Define Liquidated Damages
Agreed formula for delays protects owners; must be proportionate.
C. Clarify Payment Terms
Milestone payments
Retention and release schedules
Bank guarantees
D. Allocation of Risk
Site conditions
Permitting delays
Tax/customs
E. Insurance
Installation all-risk
Delay in start-up
F. Dispute Resolution
Choose neutral seat (Singapore, Hong Kong, Geneva)
Specify rules (SIAC, ICC, UNCITRAL)
Language of arbitration
🧾 Summary
✔ Arbitration is the primary method to resolve installation disputes in cross-border conveyor contracts.
✔ Case law supports enforcement of arbitration clauses, liquidated damages, and foreign awards.
✔ Contracts should be meticulously drafted with technical details, payment terms, and dispute mechanisms.
✔ Tribunals apply principles of consent, reasonableness, and contract intent.
RELATED Blog
comments