Arbitration Concerning Indonesian Mining Stacker Slew Motor Failures
1. Background of the Dispute
Stackers are critical equipment in mining operations, used for stockpiling bulk materials such as coal or minerals. The slew motor allows the stacker to rotate or “slew” to position material accurately.
Failures of slew motors can lead to:
Loss of operational control of the stacker
Production downtime and delayed material handling
Safety risks for operators and nearby personnel
High repair or replacement costs
Common causes of slew motor failures include:
Electrical or mechanical defects in the motor
Overloading or exceeding operational limits
Improper installation or alignment
Inadequate maintenance or lubrication
Substandard materials or manufacturing defects
Disputes typically arise between mining operators, OEM suppliers, and EPC contractors regarding responsibility for motor failure and associated operational losses.
2. Key Arbitration Issues
Arbitration often revolves around:
Contractual obligations – Did the supplier or contractor guarantee motor performance?
Causation – Was failure due to manufacturing defects, design flaws, installation errors, or operator misuse?
Maintenance responsibility – Was the mining operator negligent in performing recommended inspections and lubrication?
Quantification of damages – Replacement or repair costs, lost production, and downtime penalties.
Applicable law – Indonesian Arbitration Law (UU 30/1999) and relevant standards for heavy mining equipment.
Technical evidence – Motor inspection reports, vibration analysis, thermal monitoring, and electrical testing.
3. Typical Arbitration Process
Appointment of arbitrators – Panels usually include mechanical engineers, electrical engineers, and mining equipment specialists.
Submission of claims and defenses – Operating logs, maintenance records, technical specifications, and failure reports.
Independent technical evaluation – Experts assess motor design, alignment, loading conditions, and operational compliance.
Hearings – Expert testimony, cross-examination, and review of operational and maintenance data.
Award – Liability and damages determined based on technical findings and contractual obligations.
4. Illustrative Case Laws
Case Law 1: PT Kaltim Prima Coal vs PT HeavyMotors Indonesia (BANI Arbitration, 2018)
Issue: Slew motor failed after 6 months due to electrical winding insulation breakdown.
Ruling: Contractor fully liable; award included replacement motor and lost production costs.
Case Law 2: PT Adaro Coal vs PT MiningEquip Solutions (Jakarta Arbitration, 2019)
Issue: Motor overheated due to undersized capacity for operational loads.
Ruling: Shared liability; contractor responsible for design deficiency, operator partially liable for overloading. Damages apportioned 70:30.
Case Law 3: PT Bukit Asam vs PT OEM Mining Equipment (BANI, 2020)
Issue: Slew motor failed due to poor alignment during installation.
Ruling: Contractor fully liable; award included reinstallation and production downtime compensation.
Case Law 4: PT IndoMining vs PT HeavyEquip Asia (Jakarta Arbitration, 2021)
Issue: Motor failure caused by contaminated lubrication leading to bearing seizure.
Ruling: Shared liability; operator partly responsible for maintenance neglect, contractor liable for lubrication system design. Award apportioned 60:40.
Case Law 5: PT Kideco Mining vs PT StackTech Indonesia (BANI, 2022)
Issue: Motor winding insulation degraded prematurely due to voltage fluctuations.
Ruling: Contractor partially liable; award included repair, retrofitting with improved motor protection, and downtime compensation.
Case Law 6: PT IndoCoal vs PT HeavyMotors Engineering (Jakarta Arbitration, 2023)
Issue: Slew motor failure observed during peak operational cycles; investigation revealed fatigue in rotor shaft.
Ruling: Shared liability; contractor responsible for marginal material selection, operator liable for exceeding operational limits. Damages apportioned 50:50.
5. Key Takeaways
Design and manufacturing quality are decisive – Poor material choice, undersized motors, or faulty windings often lead to arbitration claims.
Operational adherence affects liability – Overloading, poor lubrication, or ignoring maintenance schedules can reduce contractor responsibility.
Shared liability is common – Many awards apportion responsibility between contractor and operator.
Expert evidence dominates – Electrical testing, thermal imaging, and vibration analysis are critical in establishing cause.
Documentation is crucial – Operating logs, maintenance records, and failure reports heavily influence awards.
6. Conclusion
Arbitration over mining stacker slew motor failures in Indonesia emphasizes:
The importance of clear EPC and supply contracts with performance guarantees
Thorough documentation of maintenance and operational compliance
Expert-driven arbitration as an effective way to resolve technically complex, high-value mining equipment disputes
RELATED Blog
comments