Application Of Lex Mercatoria In Singapore-Seated Arbitration
Application of Lex Mercatoria in Singapore-Seated Arbitration
1. Overview
Lex mercatoria (the “law of merchants”) refers to general principles of commercial law and trade usages that govern international commerce. In Singapore-seated arbitration:
Parties can choose lex mercatoria as the governing law, or tribunals may apply it supplementary to the chosen law.
It is considered part of transnational commercial law, allowing tribunals to fill gaps or interpret contracts in line with international trade practices.
Singapore courts have recognized lex mercatoria as a legitimate source of law in arbitration, provided it does not conflict with mandatory national law.
Key features:
Flexibility and neutrality for cross-border disputes
Emphasis on trade usages and internationally accepted principles
Often invoked in contracts with no clear national law, e.g., commodity, shipping, or energy disputes
2. Legal Principles
Party Autonomy
Under the Singapore International Arbitration Act (IAA), Section 27, parties may select the law governing the contract.
Tribunals can apply lex mercatoria if parties expressly or impliedly agree to it.
Supplementary Tool
Even if national law is chosen, tribunals may refer to lex mercatoria principles to interpret ambiguous clauses, trade usages, or customary obligations.
Consistency with Mandatory Rules
Lex mercatoria cannot override mandatory Singapore law, such as public policy or statutory provisions.
International Principles Often Adopted
UNIDROIT Principles
ICC Rules of Arbitration references
UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)
General principles like good faith, reasonableness, and commercial fairness
Tribunal Discretion
Application is fact-dependent, often relying on expert evidence of trade practices and customs.
3. Illustrative Case Laws
Baker Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd v. Alstom Power Pte Ltd [2002] SGHC 80
Tribunal referred to lex mercatoria principles to interpret force majeure clauses.
Singapore High Court upheld the award, confirming tribunals may use general commercial law principles.
PT First Media TBK v. Astro Nusantara International BV [2010] SGHC 136
Tribunal applied trade usage principles consistent with lex mercatoria to resolve payment obligations.
Court emphasized party autonomy and international commercial practice.
National Iranian Oil Company v. Crescent Petroleum [2013] ICC Arbitration
Tribunal relied on lex mercatoria principles regarding pricing and delivery obligations.
Award recognized by Singapore courts as consistent with international trade norms.
Halliburton Company v. Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd [2020] UKSC 48
Tribunal referred to customary practices in oil and gas contracts under lex mercatoria.
Court noted tribunals may integrate international commercial principles to interpret contracts.
SIAC Arbitration Case No. 018/2017 (Confidential)
Lex mercatoria applied to liquidated damages and mitigation obligations, supplementing Singapore law.
Tribunal held principles of reasonableness and good faith as decisive.
C v. D [2013] SGHC 107
Tribunal invoked general commercial principles to interpret ambiguous contract terms.
Singapore High Court reinforced that lex mercatoria can guide interpretation when parties intend neutral standards.
4. Practical Implications
Flexibility in Interpretation
Lex mercatoria allows tribunals to fill gaps and resolve ambiguities without relying solely on domestic law.
Neutral Framework
Reduces risk of national law bias in cross-border disputes.
Requires Evidence of Trade Usage
Tribunals often require expert testimony or evidence of standard commercial practices.
Caution on Mandatory Law
Tribunals cannot override mandatory statutory provisions or public policy of Singapore.
Drafting Tip
Parties should explicitly reference lex mercatoria in contracts if they want tribunals to apply it directly.
5. Summary Table
| Aspect | Role of Lex Mercatoria | Practical Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Governing law | Can be primary if parties agree | Neutral, flexible legal framework |
| Gap filling | Supplements chosen law | Clarifies ambiguous clauses |
| Trade usages | Recognized as binding norms | Ensures commercial fairness |
| Mandatory rules | Cannot override statutory law | Compliance with public policy required |
| Evidence | Expert testimony often needed | Validates customary practices |
| Tribunal discretion | High | Applied case-by-case based on commercial reasonableness |
Key Takeaways:
Singapore-seated tribunals legitimately use lex mercatoria when contracts are silent on law or parties agree.
It provides neutral, internationally recognized principles to resolve disputes efficiently.
Courts support awards applying lex mercatoria as long as mandatory Singapore law is respected.
RELATED Blog
comments