Media laws at Jamaica
Hungary's media landscape and its legal framework have been the subject of significant international scrutiny and criticism, particularly since the adoption of new media laws in 2010. While Hungary's constitution protects freedom of speech and the press, the implementation of these laws and subsequent legislative changes have raised concerns about media independence and pluralism.
Here's a breakdown of key aspects of media laws in Hungary:
1. Primary Legal Framework:
Act CIV of 2010 on the Freedom of the Press and the Fundamental Rules on Media Content ("Press and Media Act"): This law primarily regulates media content and outlines the rights and obligations of media outlets.
Act CLXXXV of 2010 on Media Services and Mass Media ("Media Law"): This law deals with media services, licensing procedures, administrative processes for enforcement, and established the key regulatory body.
These two laws replaced previous legislation from 1986 and 1996 and significantly reshaped media regulation in Hungary.
2. Regulatory Body: The National Media and Infocommunications Authority (NMHH)
The NMHH is the central regulatory body for media and telecommunications in Hungary. It oversees broadcast stations, television, newspapers, and media service providers.
The Media Council, which is an organ within the NMHH, is specifically charged with content regulation.
Appointment and Independence Concerns: A major point of contention is the appointment process of the NMHH's leadership and the Media Council members. The president of the NMHH is appointed by the Prime Minister for a nine-year term (longer than two parliamentary terms), and the Media Council members are elected by a two-thirds majority in Parliament. Critics argue that this process, coupled with the ruling party's strong parliamentary majority, undermines the independence of the regulatory body, leading to concerns about political influence over media oversight.
3. Key Features and Criticisms of Hungarian Media Laws:
Broad Scope of Regulation: The laws extended regulatory oversight from broadcast media to include print and internet-based media, including online news portals and on-demand services.
Content Requirements and "Balanced Reporting": The laws impose often vague content requirements, such as respecting the "constitutional order," refraining from offending "human dignity," and prohibiting discrimination against "any majority" or "churches." Broadcasting media are also required to offer "objective and balanced coverage." These provisions have been criticized for being open to subjective interpretation and potentially leading to self-censorship.
High Fines and Sanctions: The Media Council has the power to impose substantial fines for violations of content rules. These fines can be very high, potentially leading to the bankruptcy of smaller media outlets, and must often be paid before an appeals process can even begin. The NMHH can also suspend broadcast rights.
Control Over Public Service Media: All public media funding is centralized under the Media Service Support and Asset Management Fund (MTVA), which is supervised by the Media Council. This centralization has been criticized for depriving previously independent public media institutions of their financial and organizational autonomy, allowing for significant government influence over content.
Protection of Journalistic Sources: Concerns have been raised about the insufficient protection of journalistic sources. The law previously made the protection of sources conditional on the "public interest" value of the information, and in some interpretations, protection only applied to formally employed journalists. Courts or "authorities" can, in specific cases, oblige disclosure of sources.
Licensing Procedures: The licensing procedures for broadcasters have been criticized for lacking safeguards against arbitrariness, leading to concerns that they can be used to favor government-aligned outlets.
"Foreign Funding" Bill (Proposed/Recent Legislation in 2025): A recently proposed bill, "On the Transparency of Public Life," is a major new concern. This bill, reportedly inspired by Russian "foreign agent" laws, would allow for the blacklisting, financial restriction, and potential closure of media outlets and civil society organizations receiving foreign funds if deemed a threat to national sovereignty by the newly established Sovereignty Protection Office (SPO). Critics, including international press freedom organizations and the EU, argue this bill poses a severe threat to independent journalism, media pluralism, and fundamental EU values.
4. International and EU Scrutiny:
Hungary's media laws have consistently drawn criticism from international organizations such as the Council of Europe, the European Parliament, the OSCE Media Representative, the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, and various press freedom watchdogs (e.g., Reporters Without Borders, International Press Institute, Article 19).
The European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), which came into force in May 2024, aims to protect media independence and pluralism across the EU. Hungary has formally challenged several provisions of the EMFA before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), arguing it violates national sovereignty. The EMFA seeks to ensure the independence of media regulators and public service media, prevent the misuse of state funds to influence media, and enhance ownership transparency. The current implementation of Hungarian media laws is often seen as being in stark contrast to the EMFA's objectives.
In essence, while Hungary has a constitutional guarantee for press freedom, its media laws and their enforcement have established a highly centralized and government-influenced regulatory system. This has led to a significant erosion of media pluralism and independence, with ongoing concerns about self-censorship, the financial viability of independent media, and the potential for legal and regulatory pressure against critical voices. The proposed "foreign funding" bill further intensifies these concerns.
RELATED Blog
0 comments