Media laws at Ecuador
Media Laws in Ecuador
Ecuador has experienced significant shifts in media law and press freedom over the past two decades, swinging between periods of heavy government control and more open regulation. While the Constitution guarantees freedom of expression and freedom of the press, the country's legal framework also includes restrictive laws—notably the Organic Law of Communication, which has been amended in recent years following criticism.
🧾 Key Legal Frameworks Governing Media in Ecuador
1. 🇪🇨 Constitution of Ecuador (2008)
Articles 16–20 guarantee:
Freedom of expression
Right to communication
Freedom of the press
Right to access public information
The Constitution also emphasizes media's social responsibility, creating a balance between individual freedom and collective rights like honor, privacy, and reputation.
2. 🧑⚖️ Organic Law of Communication (LOC) — "Ley Mordaza" (2013, Reformed in 2019 & 2021)
Originally passed in 2013 during the presidency of Rafael Correa, this law was highly controversial and seen as repressive. It was dubbed the "Gag Law" (Ley Mordaza) by critics due to its tight control over content and media practices.
🔑 Original Features (2013 version):
Media content had to serve the public interest.
Created the Superintendency of Information and Communication (SUPERCOM) to monitor and sanction media content.
Enforced "balanced information" rules—requiring equal weight to all sides in news reporting.
Allowed massive fines for outlets that published content considered harmful or defamatory.
Restricted anonymous sources and required media to identify content authors.
🔄 Reforms (2019 & 2021):
The 2019 reform, under President Lenín Moreno, removed many of the restrictive aspects:
SUPERCOM was abolished.
Elimination of content supervision for "bias" or "lack of balance."
Shifted focus to self-regulation and media ethics.
Reaffirmed journalists’ right to protect sources.
The 2021 update maintained the reformed stance, with more emphasis on:
Freedom of expression as a right
Media pluralism and diversity
Digital media inclusion
3. ⚖️ Penal Code (Código Orgánico Integral Penal - COIP)
Defamation, libel, and slander remain criminal offenses.
Public officials can sue journalists or media for “attacks against honor or reputation,” although courts increasingly refer to international human rights standards.
While civil lawsuits are common, criminal penalties have been a major concern for press freedom advocates.
4. 📄 Access to Public Information Law (2004)
Guarantees the public's right to access government-held information.
Journalists use this law for investigative reporting, although enforcement is inconsistent.
The government is legally required to respond to information requests within 10 days.
🏛️ Regulatory and Oversight Bodies
Council for Communication (Consejo de Comunicación)
Replaced SUPERCOM after the 2019 reform.
Advisory role, not punitive—focused on education, media literacy, and promoting freedom of expression.
Constitutional Court
Plays a central role in defending press freedom.
Frequently addresses tensions between defamation cases and constitutional guarantees.
📉 Challenges to Media Freedom
🔻 Under Rafael Correa (2007–2017):
Period marked by hostility toward private media.
Dozens of lawsuits, sanctions, and public attacks against journalists.
Creation of a state media empire to counteract private outlets.
🔺 Under Lenín Moreno & Guillermo Lasso:
Loosening of media controls.
End of state surveillance and legal harassment of journalists.
Push for digital media regulation, especially to tackle disinformation.
❗ Current Issues:
Criminal defamation remains a legal risk.
Journalist safety is worsening amid drug violence and corruption—especially in coastal cities.
Concentration of media ownership remains a concern.
Online harassment and SLAPP suits (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) used to intimidate journalists.
✅ Summary Table
| Law / Regulation | Focus | Impact on Media |
|---|---|---|
| Constitution (2008) | Guarantees press freedom | Strong protections; includes access to information |
| Organic Law of Communication (2013/19/21) | Regulates media content and ethics | Originally restrictive; now more rights-based |
| Penal Code (COIP) | Defamation and libel | Criminalized; used by officials to silence critics |
| Access to Public Information Law (2004) | Transparency and open government | Helps investigative journalism; enforcement varies |
| Council for Communication | Oversight and ethics | Non-punitive body post-2019 reform |
📊 International Ranking
Reporters Without Borders – 2024 Press Freedom Index:
Ecuador ranks #80 (↑ improving), up from 119 in 2016.
🧾 Conclusion
Ecuador has made notable progress in restoring media freedoms after years of restrictive regulation. While reforms to the Organic Law of Communication have improved the legal climate, criminal defamation, safety concerns, and unequal access to information still pose real challenges for journalists. Ongoing efforts to reform laws and empower independent media will be critical in strengthening Ecuador's democracy.
RELATED Blog
0 comments