Dispute Resolution Compliance

1. Three Layers of Compliance

Layer A: Regulatory Compliance - Regulator mandates how disputes must be resolved

  • Banking: RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme 2021, Consumer Protection Act 2019
  • Securities: SEBI SCORES, Stock Exchange Arbitration
  • Company Law: Sec 241/242 NCLT, Sec 430 - commercial dispute

Layer B: Contractual Compliance - Clause in agreement must be followed before suit

  • Arbitration clause - Sec 8 Arbitration Act
  • Mediation clause - Mediation Act 2023
  • Tiered clause: Negotiation > Mediation > Arbitration > Litigation
  • Pre-action protocols UK CPR, India Commercial Courts Act 2015 Sec 12A

Layer C: Procedural Compliance - Once dispute starts, compliance with limitation, disclosure, confidentiality

2. Arbitration Compliance

Statutory Framework India: Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, amended 2015, 2019, 2021. UK: Arbitration Act 1996.

Compliance Checklist:

  1. Valid arbitration agreement - Sec 7 - in writing
  2. Invocation notice - Sec 21
  3. Appointment per Sec 11 - independent, impartial, disclosure Sec 12
  4. Sec 12A - mandatory pre-institution mediation for commercial suits - Commercial Courts Act
  5. Limitation - Sec 43 - 3 years

Case 1: Vidya Drolia v Durga Trading Corp - 2021 - SC - 4 Judge Bench - Arbitrability

Held 4-fold test for arbitrability:

  • Dispute not non-arbitrable per statute
  • No public policy implying non-arbitrable
  • Not sovereign function
  • Not subject matter reserved for public fora
    Held landlord-tenant under Transfer of Property Act arbitrable, but fraud, insolvency, criminal matters non-arbitrable. Compliance = check if dispute arbitrable before referring.

Case 2: BCCI v Kochi Cricket Pvt Ltd - 2018 - SC - Compliance with Amendments
Whether 2015 amendment applies to pending Sec 34 petitions. Held prospective. Compliance = apply correct version of law based on date of arbitration invocation.

Case 3: Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v HSCC India - 2019 - SC
Arbitration clause providing for appointment by CMD of party - person having interest. Held such appointment invalid under Sec 12(5) read with 7th Schedule - unilateral appointment non-compliant, violates neutrality. Disqualification compliance mandatory.

Case 4: Bharat Broadband Network v United Telecoms - 2019 - SC
Even if party does not object, if arbitrator de jure ineligible under Sec 12(5) - unilateral appointment - award void. Compliance cannot be waived by conduct.

Case 5: UK - Enka v Chubb 2020 UKSC 38 - Law of Arbitration Agreement
Compliance with governing law clause for arbitration agreement. SC held law applicable to arbitration agreement may differ from main contract law. Non-compliance leads to unenforceability under New York Convention Art V.

Case 6: Dispute Over Pre-Conditions - Compliance with Tiered Clause

M.K. Shah Engineers v State of MP - 1999 - SC and UK - Emirates Trading Agency v Prime Mineral Exports - 2014 EWHC 2104
Tiered clause - Negotiation for 30 days mandatory before arbitration. If party jumps directly to arbitration without complying with pre-condition - arbitration premature, tribunal lacks jurisdiction. Emirates Trading held obligation to undertake friendly discussion in good faith - enforceable, must be complied.

Compliance Failure Cost:

  • Sec 8 application rejected if no compliance with pre-arbitration steps? No, Sec 8 mandatory - court must refer if valid arbitration agreement exists - but tribunal may stay.

3. Mediation Compliance - New Regime

Mediation Act, 2023 - Effective India
Sec 6: Disputes suitable for mediation
Sec 12A Commercial Courts Act: Mandatory pre-institution mediation for commercial disputes - no suit without exhausting mediation - non-compliance = plaint rejected under Order VII Rule 11.

Case 7: Patil Automation Pvt Ltd v Rakheja Engineers - 2022 - SC - Sec 12A Compliance Mandatory
Commercial suit filed without pre-institution mediation. SC held Sec 12A mandatory, not directory. Plaint must be rejected. Compliance strict - except where urgent interim relief contemplated.

Same UK: CPR Pre-Action Protocols - failure to comply leads to cost sanctions even if you win.

Case 8: Afcons Infrastructure v Cherian Varkey Construction - 2010 - SC
Distinguished mediation vs conciliation. Court must refer suitable cases to ADR under Sec 89 CPC - compliance with Sec 89 - failure to consider ADR = procedural irregularity.

4. Banking Dispute Resolution Compliance - RBI

RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme, 2021 - Replaces 3 earlier schemes
Compliance steps for banks:

  • Must have Internal Ombudsman, Nodal Officer
  • Complaint to bank first - 30 days - then Ombudsman
  • Bank must comply with Ombudsman award within 30 days - else report to RBI - penalty under Banking Regulation Act Sec 46, 47A

Case 9: RBI v Neelkamal Realtors - Bombay HC 2023 - Ombudsman Award Enforceability
Bank challenged Ombudsman award in Writ. HC held Ombudsman scheme is regulatory compliance - award binding if bank does not appeal within 30 days to Appellate Authority - Deputy Governor RBI. Bank non-compliance = RBI can initiate supervisory action, impose penalty Rs 1 lakh per day.

Case 10: Dharani Sugars v Union of India - 2019 - SC - RBI Circular Compliance
RBI circular 12 Feb 2018 on resolution of stressed assets - mandated referral to IBC if resolution fails in 180 days - SC struck down as ultra vires Sec 35AA - held RBI must comply with due process, consult govt before issuing directions. Dispute resolution compliance must be within parent statute.

5. Corporate / Securities Dispute Compliance

Case 11: SEBI - SCORES Compliance - SEBI Circular 2023
Listed companies must resolve investor complaints on SCORES within 21 days. Non-compliance = penalty under SEBI LODR Reg 13, fine Rs 1000 per day, trading suspension.

Case 12: SEBI v Kishore R Ajwani - 2016 - SC
Stock exchange arbitration - BSE arbitration award under Bye-laws - compliance with limitation - appeal to Securities Appellate Tribunal - non-compliance with deposit of 50% award amount - appeal not maintainable.

Case 13: NCLT - Cyrus Investments v Tata Sons - 2021 - SC - Sec 241 Oppression
Tribunal held dispute resolution compliance - oppression petition - must first approach Board, show clean hands. Petitioner failed to comply with Articles - held not maintainable as commercial dispute disguised as oppression.

6. Consumer Dispute Compliance

Consumer Protection Act 2019 + RBI Customer Service
Bank must have Customer Service Committee of Board, display complaint number.

Case 14: SBI v Om Prakash - NCDRC 2022
Bank charged excess interest vs sanction letter - consumer forum awarded compensation. Bank argued dispute is commercial not consumer - held banking service deficiency is consumer dispute - bank failed to comply with disclosure obligations - sanction letter vs agreement - deficiency.

Case 15: UK - FCA DISP - Financial Ombudsman Service
Under FSMA 2000 Sec 226, banks must comply with FOS jurisdiction - cooperate, produce file within 4 weeks - non-compliance = adverse inference + additional compensation + FCA fine.

FCA fined Lloyds £64m in 2020 for failure to comply with dispute handling - mishandled 500,000 mortgage complaints.

7. IBC - Dispute Resolution Compliance - Section 8, 9

Case 16: Mobilox Innovations v Kirusa Software - 2017 - SC - Existence of Dispute
For Sec 9 IBC operational creditor - debtor can show pre-existing dispute - compliance: dispute must be bona fide, raised before demand notice under Sec 8 - WhatsApp/email dispute sufficient - IBC cannot be used as recovery for disputed debt.

Case 17: K. Kishan v Vijay Nirman - 2018 - SC
If arbitration already pending on same debt - existence of dispute - IBC petition not maintainable - compliance = choose forum, cannot parallel.

8. Compliance Penalties Matrix

Non-ComplianceConsequenceCase Law
No pre-institution mediation Sec 12APlaint rejected Order VII Rule 11Patil Automation 2022
Unilateral arbitrator appointmentAward void ab initioPerkins, Bharat Broadband
Tiered clause not exhaustedArbitration premature - jurisdiction challenge Sec 16Emirates Trading 2014
No disclosure Sec 12 Arbitration ActArbitrator removedHRD Corp v Steel Authority - 2011 Delhi
Bank fails Ombudsman award 30 daysRBI penalty + ContemptNeelkamal 2023
Listed Co fails SCORES 21 daysSEBI fine Rs 1000/daySEBI Circular
Consumer complaint not redressedCompensation + cost + interestSBI v Om Prakash
IBC filed despite pre-existing disputePetition rejected + cost Sec 65 - maliciousMobilox

 

9. Best Practice Compliance Framework for Banks / Companies

  1. Clause drafting: Insert valid multi-tier: "Negotiation 15 days - Mediation under Mediation Act 2023 / SIAC Rules - Arbitration - Delhi / London seat - Governing law - Institution"
  2. Invoke properly: Issue Sec 21 notice with 30 days cure, preserve limitation.
  3. Pre-action: Comply with Commercial Courts Act 12A - apply for mediation before filing suit - get non-starter report.
  4. Disclosure: Arbitrator Sec 12 disclosure + Bank file to Ombudsman within 15 days.
  5. Timelines: Arbitration 12 months Sec 29A - award within 12 months - extension by court.
  6. Preserve evidence: Bankers' Books Evidence Act 2026 certification - electronic records.
  7. Regulatory reporting: Report dispute to RBI CRILC if > Rs 5 cr fraud, to SEBI if material per LODR Reg 30.
LawGratis provides pro bono legal aid and resources to empower communities. Join us in making justice reachable for everyone! Follow our community on Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

LEAVE A COMMENT