Distressed Asset Sales .
1. Legal Character of a Distressed Sale
Key features that distinguish it from a normal M&A sale:
- Seller is not in control: Sale is conducted by Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Resolution Professional (RP), Liquidator or Secured Creditor, not the promoter.
- Time-bound and creditor-driven: Section 12 of IBC mandates 180+90 days for CIRP.
- Clean slate principle: Buyer gets asset free of past liabilities under Section 32A and Section 31.
- Discount to intrinsic value: Typically 30-70% haircut due to urgency, litigation risk, and limited warranties.
2. Legal Routes in India
A. Under IBC - As part of Resolution Plan (Regulation 37 of CIRP Regulations)
This is the most common route. The Corporate Debtor itself is sold as a going concern. Example: Sale of Essar Steel India Ltd. to ArcelorMittal for Rs. 42,000 crores.
B. Under IBC - Sale as Going Concern in Liquidation (Regulation 32(e) & 32A of Liquidation Regulations)
If resolution fails, liquidator can sell the business as a going concern to preserve employment and value. NCLT and NCLAT have repeatedly held this prevails over a scheme under Section 230 of Companies Act.
C. Under SARFAESI Act, Section 13(4)
Secured creditor can take possession and auction assets without court intervention. This sale, if concluded before moratorium under Section 14 IBC, is irreversible.
D. Through Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs) under SARFAESI Section 5
Banks assign NPAs to ARCs like Omkara ARC, Edelweiss ARC at a discount. ARC then reconstructs or sells.
E. Slump Sale under Income Tax Act, Section 50B
Often distressed assets are transferred as a slump sale - transfer of an undertaking as a whole for a lump sum.
3. Process under IBC
- Valuation: Two registered valuers to determine Fair Value and Liquidation Value - Regulation 35
- Information Memorandum and EOI: RP invites Expression of Interest
- Due Diligence: Limited, virtual data room, no management warranties
- Reserve Price: Liquidation Regulation 33 - Reserve price cannot be reduced beyond 25% without SCC approval
- Auction / Swiss Challenge: E-auction on 100% upfront payment basis. Successful bidder must deposit balance within 90 days, failing which forfeiture is valid
4. Detailed Case Laws - You must know these
1. Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2019) 16 SCC 140 - The Bible of Distressed Sales
Facts: Rs. 54,547 cr debt. CoC approved ArcelorMittal's plan. NCLAT modified distribution to give more to operational creditors.
Supreme Court Held:
- CoC's commercial wisdom is non-justiciable. Courts cannot substitute business decisions.
- Equitable treatment does not mean equal treatment. Secured financial creditors can get higher payout than operational creditors.
- Established Section 32A clean slate: Buyer not liable for offences of previous management.
This case validated distressed sale at massive haircut for value maximization.
2. Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. Saga - Two Landmark Judgments
a) JSW Steel v. Mahender Kumar Khandelwal (2021): SC initially upheld JSW's Rs.19,700 cr plan, reinforcing finality of resolution plan.
b) Kalyani Transco v. M/s Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. (02 May 2025): SC set aside the same JSW plan after 4 years of implementation and ordered liquidation.
Ratio: There was entire spectrum of lacunas and non-compliance of mandatory IBC requirements in JSW's plan. The Court held that mandatory conditions under Section 30(2) cannot be waived even if CoC approved. This has created a new era of strict compliance over commercial wisdom and is the most discussed case in 2025.
3. Properties Auctioned Under SARFAESI Before Moratorium Are Not Liquidation Assets - SC in 2023
In Punjab National Bank v. NCLT & Ors. [2023 TAXSCAN (SC) 340], SC held that if auction sale under SARFAESI is completed and sale certificate issued before declaration of moratorium under Section 14 IBC, the property does not form part of liquidation estate. NCLT cannot claw it back. Critical for buyers from banks.
4. Asset Sale Alone Can't Bar Revival - Bombay High Court in Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt Ltd v. Patheja Forging
Division Bench of Justices Gadkari and Kamal Khata held that even if secured assets are sold under SFCs Act, winding up petition can be transferred to NCLT under Section 434(1)(c) Companies Act, 2013 if there is possibility of revival under IBC. Distressed sale does not kill the company.
5. Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2019) 4 SCC 17
Upheld constitutional validity of IBC and distinction between Financial and Operational Creditors. Foundation for why financial creditors control distressed sale.
6. K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank (2019) 12 SCC 150
CoC's decision to approve or reject a resolution plan cannot be challenged on grounds of lack of reasons. Strengthened non-interference in distressed sale pricing.
7. ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2018) - Eligibility to Bid
Disqualified promoters under Section 29A cannot bid for their own distressed asset through backdoor. Ruias were disqualified from bidding for Essar Steel.
8. Anuj Jain, RP of Jaypee Infratech v. Axis Bank (2020)
Transaction of mortgage of corporate debtor's property to secure loan of holding company is a preferential and fraudulent transaction and can be avoided, impacting what is actually available for sale.
5. Protections and Risks for Buyer
What you get:
- Section 32A IBC: Immunity from prosecution for offences committed before CIRP commencement
- Section 31(1): Plan binds all stakeholders including Govt. dues
- Supreme Court in GUVNL v. Amit Gupta held IBC overrides other laws including Electricity Act where CIRP is ongoing
What you don't get:
- No title warranties. Caveat emptor.
- SC in 2025 BPSL judgment shows even after 5 years, plan can be set aside if non-compliant.
- NCLT has narrow jurisdiction, cannot adjudicate title disputes that arose before CIRP
6. Practical Checklist for Buying Distressed Assets in India
- Check moratorium date vs. sale certificate date
- Check Section 29A eligibility
- Insist on NCLT order under Section 31 approving clean slate and extinguishment of past dues
- Obtain Stakeholders Consultation Committee approval for reserve price cut >25%
- Pay within 90 days to avoid forfeiture

comments