Tk Protection In Yoga India.

Traditional Knowledge (TK) refers to knowledge, practices, and cultural expressions developed, preserved, and passed down by communities over generations. Yoga, including its asanas, pranayama (breathing), meditation, and healing practices, is a prime example of TK in India.

Legal Significance:

TK is generally not patentable if it is part of prior art or known to the public.

India’s legal framework prevents misappropriation of TK through patents, trademarks, or copyrights.

The Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) documents Yoga techniques and sequences to prevent wrongful patents abroad.

II. Legal Protection of Yoga in India

1. Indian Patent Law

Section 3(p) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970: Excludes inventions that are “essentially traditional knowledge” or “obvious”.

Yoga techniques cannot be patented because they are ancient practices, widely known, and part of public knowledge.

2. Copyright Law

Copyright protects original expression, not ideas, methods, or techniques.

Yoga asanas, sequences, or methods are considered techniques, so they cannot be copyrighted.

3. Trademark Law

Generic terms like “Yoga” or “Pranic Healing” are descriptive and traditional, so they cannot be registered as trademarks unless they acquire distinctiveness in commerce.

III. Case Laws Involving Yoga as Traditional Knowledge

1. Institute for Inner Studies v. Charlotte Anderson (Delhi High Court, 2014)

Facts:

The plaintiff claimed exclusive rights over Pranic Healing techniques and sought trademark and copyright protection.

Issues:

Can “Pranic Healing” be trademarked?

Can yoga techniques or sequences be copyrighted?

Court Findings:

Trademark: The term “Pranic Healing” is generic and cannot be exclusively owned.

Copyright: Yoga asanas and techniques are methods and procedures, not original works.

Traditional Knowledge: Yoga practices are public domain, so exclusive claims are invalid.

Significance:

Established that ancient yoga techniques cannot be monopolized under IP laws.

2. Bikram Yoga Litigation (U.S. Courts, relevant to India)

Facts:

Bikram Choudhury tried to claim copyright on a sequence of 26 yoga postures.

Court Findings:

Sequences of yoga postures are ideas and methods, not copyrightable expression.

Relevance:

Demonstrates a global principle: traditional yoga sequences cannot be privately owned, supporting India’s TKDL approach.

3. Patent Rejection Cases Using TKDL

Although there are no direct Indian court cases for yoga patents, India uses TKDL as defensive protection. Examples:

Foreign entities tried to patent yoga-related healing techniques or sequences.

TKDL documentation proved prior art, resulting in patent rejections.

Legal Principle:

Yoga, being ancient knowledge, cannot be patented. TKDL acts as legal evidence to prevent biopiracy.

4. Trademark Applications for Yoga Schools in India

Facts:

Several yoga institutes tried to register terms like “Yoga Healing” or “Yoga Life” as trademarks.

Outcome:

Courts/trademark offices held that these are generic terms derived from traditional knowledge.

Only if a distinctive brand identity is developed (e.g., “Patanjali Yoga Academy”), it can be protected.

Significance:

Reinforces that traditional knowledge itself is public domain, but brand differentiation is protectable.

5. Neem and Turmeric Cases (Analogous to Yoga TK Protection)

Facts:

Patents were filed abroad claiming medicinal properties of turmeric and neem.

Outcome:

India successfully challenged them using evidence of prior art in traditional knowledge.

Relevance to Yoga:

Demonstrates the legal strategy for defending yoga practices using documented traditional knowledge.

6. Other Judicial Observations

Courts have consistently stated that traditional knowledge cannot be monopolized.

Techniques, systems, or methods, even if organized in a specific way, cannot be copyrighted.

TKDL helps prevent misappropriation of yoga as part of India’s cultural heritage.

IV. Key Legal Takeaways

No Patents for Yoga: Ancient techniques and sequences cannot be patented.

No Copyright for Yoga Methods: Only expression (books, videos) can be copyrighted.

Generic Terms Not Trademarkable: “Yoga” and related traditional names are public domain.

TKDL is Key Protection Tool: Digitizes yoga knowledge and prevents wrongful patents.

Branding is Protectable: Distinctive names for yoga schools or products can be trademarked.

V. Conclusion

India’s approach to Yoga as Traditional Knowledge is defensive and preservative:

It prevents biopiracy.

It recognizes yoga as public domain heritage.

Courts consistently reject attempts to monopolize ancient yoga practices.

The combination of TKDL, patent law, trademark law, and judicial rulings ensures that yoga remains a shared cultural heritage, not a commodity for private ownership.

LEAVE A COMMENT