Torrent Site Blocking Orders India
Torrent Site Blocking Orders in India – Overview
Torrent sites are platforms that facilitate peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing using the BitTorrent protocol. While the technology is legal, pirated content distribution (movies, music, software, e-books) via torrent sites is illegal under Indian copyright law.
Legal Framework:
Copyright Act, 1957:
Section 51: Exclusive rights of copyright holders.
Section 52: Exceptions (fair use, personal use, education).
Information Technology Act, 2000:
Section 66: Cyber offenses.
Section 79: Safe harbor provisions for intermediaries if they comply with takedown notices.
Judicial and Regulatory Mechanisms:
Courts issue blocking orders against ISPs to prevent access to infringing torrent sites.
Intermediaries (ISPs) are required to comply under IT Act to maintain safe harbor protection.
Key Legal Issues in Torrent Blocking Cases:
Scope of copyright infringement through torrent sites.
Intermediary liability for hosting or linking to infringing content.
Balance between censorship and access to information.
Enforcement challenges for foreign-hosted torrent sites.
Key Torrent Site Blocking Orders – Case Studies
1. M/s Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Reliance Communications Ltd. & Ors (2007)
Court: Delhi High Court
Facts: Music label (T-Series) filed a case against ISPs hosting or linking to pirated music via torrent sites.
Issue: Can ISPs be directed to block access to infringing torrent sites?
Decision: Court directed ISPs to block infringing links and websites, emphasizing copyright protection.
Reasoning:
Torrent sites were facilitating infringement on a commercial scale.
ISPs have duty to act as intermediaries and comply with court orders.
Impact:
Set early precedent for blocking orders against torrent and P2P sites.
2. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. MySpace Inc. & Ors (2010)
Court: Delhi High Court
Facts: Warner Bros sued intermediaries and torrent sites for hosting pirated movies.
Issue: Intermediary liability and blocking of infringing content.
Decision: Court ordered ISPs to block specific URLs and torrent trackers, clarifying safe harbor obligations.
Reasoning:
ISPs must act promptly on takedown notices to avoid liability.
Torrent sites outside India may still be blocked via domestic ISPs.
Impact:
Reinforced Section 79 IT Act compliance for intermediaries.
3. Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt. Ltd. v. BSNL & Ors (2012)
Court: Delhi High Court
Facts: Pirated movies and TV shows were widely shared via torrent sites.
Issue: Blocking access to international torrent websites for copyright protection.
Decision: Court directed ISPs to block 25 torrent sites, including The Pirate Bay and Kickass Torrents.
Reasoning:
Torrent sites infringe copyright and cause irreparable commercial harm.
Blocking access is a proportionate measure.
Impact:
Initiated the large-scale torrent site blocking trend in India.
ISPs’ compliance became mandatory for safe harbor.
4. Disney India v. MTNL & Ors (2013)
Court: Delhi High Court
Facts: Disney content (movies, TV shows) was illegally shared via torrent websites.
Issue: Blocking foreign-hosted torrent sites within India.
Decision: Court ordered ISPs to block access to 50 torrent sites.
Reasoning:
Access to infringing content must be restricted to protect copyright holders.
ISPs must implement blocking promptly.
Impact:
Reinforced the legality of blocking international torrent domains in India.
5. Motion Picture Association (MPA) v. Tata Communications & Ors (2016)
Court: Delhi High Court
Facts: MPA members reported continued access to pirated films via torrent sites.
Issue: Enforcement of prior blocking orders and ISP compliance.
Decision: Court directed strict compliance and periodic monitoring.
Reasoning:
Persistent access to pirated content undermines copyright enforcement.
Blocking orders are continuous obligations for ISPs.
Impact:
Set precedent for monitoring compliance and periodic ISP reporting.
6. Bollywood Torrent Blocking Cases (2018-2020)
Facts: Multiple Bollywood production houses, including Yash Raj Films and Zee Entertainment, filed actions against torrent websites.
Decisions:
Court ordered blocking of more than 200 torrent sites, including extraterritorial domains.
ISPs were directed to implement DNS and IP-level blocking.
Reasoning:
Scale of piracy via torrents warranted comprehensive blocking.
Protects domestic film industry revenues.
Impact:
Created a dynamic “torrent blacklist” maintained by ISPs under court supervision.
7. Cambridge University Press v. Reproprint & Ors (2015) – Academic Torrent Blocking
Court: Delhi High Court
Facts: Academic books were illegally shared via torrent sites.
Issue: Copyright infringement of textbooks via P2P platforms.
Decision: Court ordered ISPs to block access to torrent sites hosting academic content.
Reasoning:
Academic publishers are entitled to same copyright protections as commercial content creators.
Impact:
Extended torrent blocking orders to educational and academic content, not just movies and music.
Key Legal Takeaways from Torrent Site Blocking Cases
ISPs are critical intermediaries: Under Section 79 IT Act, ISPs must comply with court orders or takedown notices to maintain safe harbor.
Extraterritorial blocking is valid: Courts can order ISPs to block access to foreign-hosted torrent sites.
Blocking orders are evolving: Courts have moved from URL-specific to domain-level and IP-level blocking.
Enforcement is ongoing: Compliance requires regular monitoring due to new torrent domains.
Balance with access to information: Courts emphasize proportionality to avoid overreach but prioritize copyright protection.
RELATED Blog
comments