Reasons for the Growth of Administrative Law
✅ Reasons for the Growth of Administrative Law in India
Administrative Law is a branch of public law that governs the actions of government agencies and authorities. It has seen rapid growth in India, particularly in the post-independence era.
Let’s break down why administrative law has grown so significantly, followed by case laws that show its practical application.
🔹 1. Expansion of the State’s Role (Welfare State)
After independence, India adopted the model of a welfare state as per the Directive Principles of State Policy in Part IV of the Constitution.
The government became responsible for education, health, employment, housing, and social security.
This led to the creation of numerous regulatory bodies and administrative authorities.
Example:
Case: Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)
Issue: Eviction of pavement dwellers by a municipal authority.
Held: Right to livelihood is part of the right to life (Article 21), and administrative actions must respect this.
Significance: Welfare goals must be pursued within the bounds of law and rights.
🔹 2. Need for Delegated Legislation
Parliament cannot manage all detailed aspects of governance.
It delegates powers to administrative bodies to make rules, notifications, by-laws, etc.
This delegated legislation allows quick responses to technical and local issues.
Example:
Case: D.S. Garewal v. State of Punjab (1959)
Issue: Appointment of civil servants under delegated authority.
Held: Delegated legislation is valid if essential legislative functions remain with the legislature.
Significance: Validated the concept of controlled delegation under administrative law.
🔹 3. Complexity of Modern Governance
Industrialization, urbanization, and science have made governance more technical.
Expert agencies (e.g., SEBI, TRAI, RBI) are better suited to handle specialized functions.
Example:
Case: A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969)
Issue: Allegations of bias in administrative selection processes.
Held: Administrative bodies exercising quasi-judicial functions must follow principles of natural justice.
Significance: Even experts must act fairly; complexity doesn’t justify arbitrariness.
🔹 4. Need for Speedy Action and Flexibility
Legislative and judicial processes are time-consuming.
Administrative authorities can take quick and flexible decisions, especially in emergencies.
Example:
Case: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Issue: Passport impounded without fair hearing.
Held: Administrative decisions affecting rights must follow fair procedures.
Significance: Speed is necessary, but cannot bypass fairness and due process.
🔹 5. Increased Public Awareness and Rights-Consciousness
People are more aware of their rights and expect transparent, fair, and accountable governance.
The judiciary has expanded the scope of judicial review over administrative actions.
Example:
Case: State of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh (1980)
Issue: Acquisition of land without proper justification.
Held: Government must act in public interest, not arbitrarily.
Significance: Public accountability is essential in administrative functions.
🔹 6. Growth of Judicial Review and Activism
The judiciary acts as a guardian of the Constitution and checks on administrative abuse.
Courts now actively examine whether administrative actions are arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair.
Example:
Case: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)
Issue: Section 66A of IT Act declared vague and unconstitutional.
Held: Law violated freedom of speech; administrative enforcement was open to misuse.
Significance: Reaffirmed the role of courts in checking administrative overreach.
🔹 7. Protection of Fundamental Rights
Administrative decisions often impact rights related to life, liberty, property, expression, and equality.
Administrative law serves as a tool to enforce and protect these rights.
Example:
Case: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)
Issue: Challenge to Prime Minister's election under administrative tribunal.
Held: Law that attempted to place administrative decisions beyond judicial scrutiny was unconstitutional.
Significance: Rule of law and fair process cannot be compromised.
🧾 Summary Table: Reasons & Cases
| Reason for Growth | Description | Case Example |
|---|---|---|
| Welfare State Role | Increased government functions for public welfare | Olga Tellis v. BMC |
| Delegated Legislation | Need for administrative rule-making | D.S. Garewal v. State of Punjab |
| Technical Complexity | Specialized bodies needed for technical governance | A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India |
| Speed and Flexibility | Administrative bodies act faster than courts/legislature | Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India |
| Public Awareness | Rise in demands for fairness and accountability | State of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh |
| Judicial Review and Activism | Courts actively supervise administrative actions | Shreya Singhal v. Union of India |
| Protection of Fundamental Rights | Administrative law ensures rights are respected | Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain |
✅ Conclusion:
The growth of administrative law in India is a response to the demands of modern governance, welfare responsibilities, and the need for checks and balances. Courts have played a crucial role in shaping this area of law by interpreting constitutional guarantees and insisting on fairness, transparency, and accountability in administrative actions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments