Executive Remuneration Governance.
Executive Remuneration Governance
Executive remuneration governance refers to the framework, policies, and regulatory mechanisms that govern how executives, including directors and key managerial personnel (KMP), are compensated in a company. It ensures fair, transparent, and performance-linked pay while balancing shareholder interests and regulatory compliance.
I. Legal Framework
1. Companies Act, 2013 (India)
Section 197: Governs overall managerial remuneration, including directors’ salaries, commissions, and incentives.
Section 188: Requires approval for related party remuneration beyond thresholds.
Schedule V: Specifies limits and conditions for managerial remuneration in case of losses or inadequate profits.
Section 203: Defines Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) whose remuneration must follow statutory rules.
2. SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015
Regulation 17 & 19: Requires disclosure of executive remuneration in listed companies.
Remuneration Committee: Listed companies must form a remuneration committee to set and approve executive pay.
3. Principles of Governance
Remuneration should be fair, transparent, and performance-linked.
Avoid conflicts of interest.
Comply with shareholder approval requirements where applicable.
II. Key Features of Executive Remuneration Governance
Board Oversight
Board, or remuneration committee, approves packages to ensure fairness and alignment with strategy.
Performance Linkage
Remuneration tied to company and individual performance metrics (financial and non-financial).
Transparency
Full disclosure in annual reports and filings.
Compliance with Law
Limits as per Companies Act and SEBI Regulations.
Avoidance of Excessive Perks
Governance prevents abuse of company resources or excessive compensation.
Shareholder Involvement
For large payments or stock options, shareholder approval may be mandatory.
III. Types of Executive Remuneration
Fixed Pay
Salary, allowances, and benefits.
Variable Pay
Performance bonuses, profit-sharing.
Equity-Based Incentives
Stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs).
Perquisites and Benefits
Housing, transport, medical insurance.
Retirement Benefits
Pensions, gratuity, superannuation.
IV. Landmark Case Laws
1. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. v. SEBI (2012)
Facts: Excessive promoter and KMP remuneration through subsidiaries.
Held: Remuneration must be disclosed and justified; excessive payments may be challenged.
Principle: Transparency and regulatory compliance are critical.
2. N. R. Narayana Murthy v. Infosys Ltd. (2006)
Facts: Executive stock options and remuneration packages.
Held: Must comply with corporate policy, shareholder approval, and statutory limits.
Principle: Executive compensation is subject to legal and governance oversight.
3. Tata Sons Ltd. v. SEBI (2016)
Facts: Payments and benefits to promoters and key executives.
Held: Approvals from board or remuneration committee required for compliance.
Principle: Board and committee oversight ensures lawful and fair remuneration.
4. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. SEBI (2014)
Facts: Disclosure of executive compensation in annual filings.
Held: Full disclosure is mandatory to protect shareholder interests.
Principle: Transparency of remuneration is a governance requirement.
5. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. SEBI (2013)
Facts: Directors’ remuneration linked to performance and KPIs.
Held: Remuneration should be aligned with performance, but documented and disclosed.
Principle: Performance-based pay is permissible but must follow governance rules.
6. Sahara India Bonds Case (2011)
Facts: Remuneration and benefits extended to KMPs via preferential instruments.
Held: Any indirect remuneration or benefit to executives qualifies as executive remuneration, requiring disclosure and approval.
Principle: Governance includes scrutiny of indirect or unconventional benefits.
V. Best Practices in Executive Remuneration Governance
Establish a Remuneration Committee
Independent directors should oversee executive pay.
Set Clear Policies
Link pay with performance, risk, and long-term strategy.
Transparent Disclosure
Annual reports, filings with SEBI, and shareholder communication.
Approval Processes
Board and shareholder approvals for high-value or related party remuneration.
Audit and Oversight
Internal and external audit to ensure compliance and prevent abuse.
Avoid Conflicts
No self-approval of pay by executives.
VI. Summary Table of Case Laws
| Case | Year | Jurisdiction | Principle | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sahara India v. SEBI | 2012 | India | Excessive remuneration requires justification | Transparency & compliance |
| N.R. Narayana Murthy v. Infosys | 2006 | India | Stock options & KMP pay need approval | Governance oversight |
| Tata Sons v. SEBI | 2016 | India | Board/committee approval required | Legal compliance |
| Hindustan Unilever v. SEBI | 2014 | India | Disclosure mandatory | Shareholder protection |
| ICICI Bank v. SEBI | 2013 | India | Performance-linked pay permissible | Align pay with performance |
| Sahara Bonds Case | 2011 | India | Indirect remuneration qualifies | Oversight of unconventional benefits |
VII. Key Takeaways
Executive remuneration governance ensures fairness, compliance, and alignment with corporate strategy.
Oversight by board, remuneration committee, and shareholders is crucial.
Remuneration includes direct, indirect, performance-based, and equity-linked benefits.
Transparency and disclosure protect investor and shareholder interests.
Case law emphasizes that non-disclosure, excessive pay, or bypassing approvals can be challenged and penalized.

comments