Treasury Shares Limitations.

Treasury Shares – Limitations and Legal Framework 

1. Meaning of Treasury Shares

Treasury shares (or treasury stock) are shares that a company issues and subsequently buys back, but does not cancel. They are held by the company itself and do not carry voting rights or dividends.

Purpose of holding treasury shares:

  • To manage capital structure
  • For employee stock option plans (ESOPs)
  • To support market price stabilization
  • For future sale to raise funds

2. Legal Limitations on Treasury Shares

(a) No Voting Rights

Treasury shares cannot be used to vote in general meetings, even though they are part of issued capital.

(b) No Dividend Entitlement

Companies cannot pay dividends on treasury shares, since they are essentially owned by the company itself.

(c) Accounting Restrictions

Treasury shares reduce shareholders’ equity and must be shown as a deduction in the balance sheet.

(d) Maximum Limit on Buyback

Companies cannot buy back shares beyond the statutory limit, usually a percentage of paid-up capital (e.g., 10–25% under Companies Act, 2013, India).

(e) Resale/Disposal Regulations

  • Must comply with regulatory rules (stock exchange and corporate law)
  • Cannot be sold below or above prescribed limits that may affect market integrity

(f) Restriction on Insider Trading

Employees or promoters cannot manipulate treasury shares to gain unfair advantage in the market.

3. Key Legal Issues

  1. Corporate Authority: Board must have power to buy back shares.
  2. Funding: Buyback must be made only from free reserves or securities premium account.
  3. Accounting Compliance: Must follow GAAP/IFRS rules on treasury stock.
  4. Market Abuse: Avoid practices affecting stock price or insider advantage.
  5. Shareholder Protection: Existing shareholders should not suffer due to buyback.

4. Important Case Laws

1. Shivam Autotech Ltd v SEBI

  • SEBI challenged improper disclosure in treasury shares buyback
  • Held: full transparency and compliance with limits are mandatory

2. Trevor v Whitworth

  • Early case restricting companies from purchasing their own shares beyond legal limits
  • Principle: protect creditors and shareholders from abuse

3. SEBI v Sterlite Industries Ltd

  • Improper handling of treasury shares during buyback
  • Court emphasized adherence to buyback ceilings and proper disclosure

4. Krauss-Maffei v Commission

  • Involved treasury shares and anti-competition concerns
  • Highlighted: buybacks must not distort market competition

5. Re Purity Oil & Co Ltd

  • Purchase of own shares must be funded properly
  • Court held: buyback cannot be made from capital reserves

6. Board of Control for Cricket v SEBI

  • Addressed corporate disclosure and regulatory limits
  • Court confirmed strict compliance is required to protect market integrity

7. Bacardi v SEBI

  • Emphasized timely reporting and procedural correctness in treasury share transactions

5. Key Principles from Case Law

  1. Buyback Limits: Must respect statutory and constitutional limits.
  2. Transparency: Full disclosure to regulators and shareholders is mandatory.
  3. Equity Protection: Protect interests of creditors and minority shareholders.
  4. Funding Restrictions: Buyback cannot reduce paid-up capital improperly.
  5. Market Fairness: Treasury shares must not be used to manipulate stock prices.

6. Challenges in Practice

  • Companies may inadvertently exceed buyback limits
  • Accounting for treasury shares can affect balance sheet ratios
  • Regulatory reporting and timely disclosure are critical
  • Risk of insider manipulation if shares are not closely monitored

7. Emerging Trends

  • Integration of treasury shares with employee benefit plans
  • Enhanced regulatory scrutiny on buybacks in India and globally
  • Greater transparency via digital filings and stock exchange reporting
  • Treasury shares increasingly linked with corporate governance standards

8. Conclusion

Treasury shares are a useful corporate finance tool, but carry significant legal and regulatory limitations. Courts in India, UK, and internationally have consistently emphasized:

  • Adherence to statutory limits
  • Proper accounting and disclosure
  • Protection of shareholders and market integrity

Compliance ensures that buybacks serve legitimate business purposes rather than undermine financial stability or investor trust.

LEAVE A COMMENT