Trade Secret Protection In Emerging Technologies.
Trade Secret Protection in Emerging Technologies
Emerging technologies like AI, quantum computing, neurotech, blockchain, and biotechnology often rely heavily on trade secrets. Unlike patents, trade secrets protect confidential business information without registration but require:
Secrecy: Information must be genuinely confidential.
Economic Value: Information provides a competitive advantage.
Reasonable Measures: The owner must take steps to maintain secrecy (NDAs, security protocols, restricted access).
Key Challenges in Emerging Technologies:
High employee mobility leads to knowledge leakage.
Collaboration and open-source innovation can conflict with secrecy.
Rapid innovation cycles make patents impractical; trade secrets offer immediate protection.
Cross-border enforcement is difficult due to differing laws (US, EU, China, India).
Legal Remedies:
Civil lawsuits for misappropriation
Injunctions to prevent further disclosure
Damages for lost profits or unjust enrichment
Criminal remedies in some jurisdictions (e.g., Economic Espionage Act, USA)
Important Case Laws on Trade Secret Protection in Emerging Technologies
1. Waymo v. Uber (2017–2018, USA)
Context: Waymo (Alphabet subsidiary) sued Uber for stealing trade secrets related to autonomous vehicle LIDAR technology.
Issue: Alleged misappropriation of confidential self-driving car designs and source code by a former Waymo engineer now at Uber.
Court Findings:
Uber settled before trial, agreeing to pay $245 million in stock.
Court emphasized that trade secrets extended to technical documentation, source code, and know-how.
Significance: Highlighted trade secret enforcement in AI and autonomous vehicle technologies; the importance of NDAs and employee exit protocols.
2. Tesla v. Zoox (2019, California, USA)
Context: Tesla accused a former employee of sharing confidential self-driving vehicle technology with Zoox, a rival.
Issue: Trade secret misappropriation through employee transfer.
Court Findings:
Court issued preliminary injunction against employee’s involvement in Zoox projects using Tesla’s trade secrets.
Tesla demonstrated reasonable measures to protect secrecy, such as restricted server access and NDAs.
Significance: Reinforced that emerging tech companies must proactively safeguard trade secrets, especially for autonomous vehicle AI.
3. Waymo v. Uber AI Simulations – Source Code Case (2018, USA)
Context: Dispute focused on simulation environments and proprietary algorithms for LIDAR and autonomous driving AI.
Issue: Whether algorithm structures and simulation data qualified as trade secrets.
Court Findings:
Court affirmed algorithms and simulations as trade secrets due to their economic value and confidentiality measures.
Significance: Expanded trade secret protection to AI models, datasets, and simulations, not just physical designs.
4. DuPont v. Kolon Industries (2011, USA)
Context: DuPont sued Kolon for stealing Kevlar manufacturing secrets, a high-tech material used in defense and industrial applications.
Issue: Trade secret misappropriation in advanced materials technology.
Court Findings:
Jury awarded $919 million in damages (later reduced).
Highlighted extensive internal security measures and employee monitoring.
Significance: Early illustration that advanced materials and biotech require robust trade secret protection.
5. Samsung v. Apple – Smartphone Technology (2012, USA)
Context: Apple claimed Samsung misused confidential design and interface information in smartphones.
Issue: Trade secret misappropriation vs patent infringement.
Court Findings:
Court partially recognized Apple’s trade secret claims related to internal designs and prototypes.
Significance: Trade secret protection complements patents in fast-moving consumer tech markets, especially where design and software overlap.
6. Epic Games v. Silicon Knights (2005, USA)
Context: Silicon Knights used Epic’s Unreal Engine source code beyond license scope.
Issue: Misappropriation of proprietary game engine software.
Court Findings:
Silicon Knights ordered to destroy all code and pay damages.
Significance: Trade secret law protects software algorithms and game engine source code, which are critical in emerging digital entertainment tech.
7. Illumina v. BGI (2020, USA)
Context: BGI (China) allegedly gained access to Illumina’s sequencing technology trade secrets via former employees.
Issue: High-value genomic sequencing technology misappropriation.
Court Findings:
Injunction granted against further use, litigation ongoing for damages.
Significance: Reinforced trade secret protection in biotechnology and genomics, where data and manufacturing methods are proprietary.
Key Principles from These Cases
Employee Exit Protocols are Critical: Former employees can pose the highest risk.
Algorithms, Datasets, and Simulations are Protectable: Not just physical designs.
Reasonable Security Measures Matter: Courts evaluate encryption, access restrictions, NDAs, and audit trails.
Cross-Border Enforcement is Complex: Many emerging tech disputes involve multinational companies.
Litigation and Settlement Often Protect IP Faster than Patent Filing: For rapidly evolving technologies, trade secrets offer immediate protection.
Best Practices for Emerging Tech Startups
Use comprehensive NDAs and confidentiality agreements with employees, contractors, and collaborators.
Implement strict access controls and audit logs for sensitive information.
Document internal procedures for protecting trade secrets.
Limit knowledge sharing to a need-to-know basis.
Consider strategic patenting for core technologies while keeping complementary know-how secret.
RELATED Blog
comments