• 

Public Cbcr Compliance

Public Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) Compliance 

1. What is Public CbCR?

Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) is part of the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) framework, specifically Action 13, which requires large multinational enterprises (MNEs) to disclose financial and tax-related information for each jurisdiction in which they operate.

Public CbCR goes a step further:
Instead of reporting only to tax authorities, companies must publish this data for public access.

2. Objective of Public CbCR

• Enhance tax transparency
• Prevent profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions
• Strengthen accountability of multinational corporations
• Enable stakeholders (investors, civil society, regulators) to assess tax practices

3. Key Legal Frameworks

(A) OECD BEPS Action 13

• Introduced a three-tier documentation system:
  1. Master File
  2. Local File
  3. CbCR

(B) European Union Public CbCR Directive

• Adopted by the European Union
• Applies to MNEs with:
  • Consolidated revenue > €750 million
• Requires disclosure of:
  • Revenue
  • Profit before tax
  • Income tax paid
  • Number of employees

(C) Indian Framework

• Under the Income Tax Act, 1961:
  • Section 286 mandates CbCR filing (non-public)
• India does not yet mandate public CbCR, but follows OECD guidelines.

4. Applicability

Public CbCR generally applies to:

• Multinational groups with global turnover exceeding €750 million
• Parent entities or subsidiaries in jurisdictions implementing public disclosure

5. Information Required in Public CbCR

Companies must disclose:

• Revenue (related & unrelated parties)
• Profit or loss before tax
• Income tax accrued and paid
• Accumulated earnings
• Number of employees
• Nature of activities in each jurisdiction

6. Compliance Requirements

(1) Filing & Publication

• Reports must be:
  • Filed with tax authorities
  • Published on company websites or registries

(2) Audit & Assurance

• Some jurisdictions require independent verification

(3) Timeline

• Typically within 12 months of financial year-end

(4) Penalties for Non-Compliance

• Monetary penalties
• Reputational risk
• Regulatory scrutiny

7. Key Challenges

• Data consistency across jurisdictions
• Confidentiality concerns
• Increased compliance costs
• Risk of misinterpretation by public stakeholders

8. Important Case Laws

Below are at least 6 relevant judicial decisions and disputes connected to transparency, transfer pricing, and tax disclosures (including CbCR-related principles):

1. Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India

Principle:

• Tax jurisdiction over cross-border transactions

Relevance:

• Highlighted need for greater transparency in multinational structures, which CbCR aims to address.

2. Google India Pvt Ltd v. ACIT

Principle:

• Transfer pricing adjustments and profit allocation

Relevance:

• Demonstrates how jurisdiction-wise reporting (CbCR) can help tax authorities detect profit shifting.

3. GlaxoSmithKline Asia Pvt Ltd v. Additional CIT

Principle:

• Arm’s length pricing in intra-group transactions

Relevance:

• CbCR supports such analysis by giving global profit allocation visibility.

4. Starbucks Manufacturing BV v. European Commission

Principle:

• Illegal state aid via tax rulings

Relevance:

• Public CbCR would expose preferential tax treatment across countries.

5. Apple Inc. v. European Commission

Principle:

• Allocation of profits to low-tax jurisdictions

Relevance:

• One of the strongest drivers behind EU’s push for public CbCR.

6. LuxLeaks Scandal Cases

Principle:

• Disclosure of secret tax rulings

Relevance:

• Direct catalyst for public tax transparency reforms, including public CbCR.

7. Cadbury Schweppes plc v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue

Principle:

• Artificial profit shifting vs genuine business activity

Relevance:

• CbCR helps distinguish real vs artificial economic presence.

9. Global Trends

• Increasing adoption of public tax transparency regimes
• ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) metrics now include tax transparency
• Pressure from:
  • Investors
  • NGOs
  • Governments

10. Conclusion

Public CbCR represents a paradigm shift in international taxation, moving from confidential compliance to open accountability. While it increases transparency and reduces tax avoidance opportunities, it also raises concerns around data misuse and competitive sensitivity.

For India, although public disclosure is not yet mandatory, future alignment with global standards—especially EU frameworks—is likely.

RELATED Blog

Corporate Law at Afghanistan

Corporate Law at Albania

Corporate Law at Algeria

Corporate Law at American Samoa (US)

Corporate Law at Bangladesh

Corporate Law at Andorra

Corporate Law at Angola

Corporate Law at Antigua and Barbuda

Corporate Law at Anguilla (BOT)

Corporate Law at Argentina