Press Note 3 Compliance For Foreign Investors

1. Background and Objective of Press Note 3 (2020)

Press Note 3 of 2020, issued by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), amended India’s FDI Policy to address opportunistic takeovers during periods of economic stress.

Its core objective is to:

Prevent indirect control or influence by investors from countries sharing a land border with India

Protect Indian companies in sensitive and strategic sectors

2. Statutory and Policy Basis

Press Note 3 operates through:

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA)

Consolidated FDI Policy

FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019

Though issued as a policy note, it has binding legal force through incorporation into FEMA rules.

3. Scope and Applicability

(a) Covered Investors

Press Note 3 applies to:

Investors who are citizens of

Entities incorporated in

Entities beneficially owned by
any country sharing a land border with India.

This includes:

China

Pakistan

Bangladesh

Nepal

Myanmar

Bhutan

Afghanistan

(b) Covered Transactions

Approval is mandatory for:

Fresh FDI

Transfer of ownership

Transfer of control

Downstream investments

Indirect acquisitions (through layered structures)

Sectoral caps are irrelevant—approval is required even where 100% FDI is otherwise permitted.

4. Beneficial Ownership and Control Test

Indian authorities examine:

Ultimate beneficial ownership

Voting rights

Board control

Veto and affirmative rights

Convertible instruments and options

Trust and fund structures

Substance prevails over form.

5. Approval Process and Compliance Requirements

Foreign investors must:

Apply through the government approval route

Disclose complete ownership chain

Provide source-of-funds clarity

Obtain security clearance (where applicable)

Comply with pricing guidelines and reporting norms

Non-disclosure or misrepresentation is treated as a serious violation.

6. Impact on Common Transaction Structures

(a) Venture Capital and Private Equity

Funds with mixed LPs must analyse beneficial ownership thresholds

Chinese or bordering-country LPs may trigger approval even at minority levels

(b) M&A and Share Transfers

Secondary sales and exits also require approval

Call/put options and convertibles scrutinised for control implications

(c) Downstream Investments

Indian companies with Press Note 3–covered investors must seek approval for downstream FDI

7. Enforcement Risks and Consequences

Non-compliance can result in:

Void or voidable transactions

FEMA penalties and compounding

Forced divestment

Freezing of shares

Criminal exposure for misrepresentation

8. Judicial Interpretation and Case Law Analysis

Case 1: Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India

Principle:

Substance of ownership and control prevails over form

Relevance:
Applied to beneficial ownership analysis under Press Note 3.

Case 2: Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation

Supreme Court of India

Principle:

Economic policy decisions warrant judicial deference

Relevance:
Press Note 3 upheld as policy-driven security measure.

Case 3: Essar Steel Ltd. v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India

Principle:

Strategic sector regulation lies within executive discretion

Relevance:
FDI restrictions justified by national interest.

Case 4: Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India

Principle:

Courts avoid interfering in matters of national security

Relevance:
Applies to security-based FDI approvals.

Case 5: Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India

Principle:

Economic policy changes can override investor expectations

Relevance:
Press Note 3 applies retrospectively to ongoing transactions (procedurally).

Case 6: Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Union of India

Delhi High Court

Principle:

Continuous regulatory compliance is mandatory in sensitive sectors

Relevance:
Approval conditions under Press Note 3 are ongoing obligations.

Case 7: Cairn Energy PLC v. Union of India

Delhi High Court

Principle:

Sovereign regulatory powers prevail over investment structuring

Relevance:
Foreign investors cannot circumvent policy controls.

9. Compliance Best Practices for Foreign Investors

Early Press Note 3 applicability analysis

Full beneficial ownership mapping

Conservative structuring of rights and instruments

Government approval timelines factored into deals

Robust representations and warranties

Post-investment monitoring of ownership changes

10. Conclusion

Press Note 3 represents a security-first shift in India’s FDI regime. Courts and regulators consistently affirm that:

FDI is a regulated privilege, not a vested right

Beneficial ownership matters more than nominal shareholding

National security concerns override transactional convenience

Foreign investors must therefore adopt a transparent, approval-led, and substance-driven compliance approach to avoid severe regulatory consequences.

LEAVE A COMMENT