Misappropriation Trade Secrets India.
A trade secret refers to any confidential business information that provides a company with a competitive advantage. Unlike patents, trade secrets are not registered, and protection depends on maintaining secrecy.
Examples:
Manufacturing processes
Customer lists
Pricing strategies
Formulas (like the Coca-Cola formula)
Software algorithms
1. Legal Basis for Trade Secrets in India
India does not have a dedicated Trade Secret Act, but trade secrets are protected under:
Common Law Principles (Contractual & Tort Law)
Breach of confidence
Misrepresentation
Unlawful use of confidential information
Specific Statutory Provisions:
Indian Contract Act, 1872: Restrictive covenants in employment or business contracts
Information Technology Act, 2000: Protection of confidential electronic data
Judicial Precedents:
Courts rely heavily on equity, breach of confidence, and misappropriation doctrines.
2. Essentials of Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
For a claim of trade secret misappropriation in India, the plaintiff must establish:
Existence of a Trade Secret
Information must be confidential and not generally known in the industry.
Secrecy Measures Taken
Plaintiff must show reasonable steps to maintain secrecy (NDAs, restricted access).
Misappropriation by Defendant
Defendant acquired the trade secret improperly (e.g., theft, breach of NDA, industrial espionage).
Use of the Trade Secret
Defendant used or disclosed the secret, causing harm to the plaintiff’s business.
3. Landmark Indian Cases on Trade Secret Misappropriation
Case 1: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd. (2008)
Facts:
Roche alleged that Cipla was manufacturing generic versions of patented cancer drugs.
Roche argued confidential formulations were misappropriated.
Holding:
Court emphasized that confidential information, if misused, can amount to trade secret misappropriation even if the product is patented elsewhere.
Roche’s secrecy measures (lab records, restricted access) supported its claim.
Principle: Trade secrets are protected when reasonable steps are taken to maintain confidentiality.
Case 2: Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motors (1992)
Facts:
Bajaj alleged that TVS copied its engine design and manufacturing process.
The designs were shared under a business arrangement but later allegedly misused.
Holding:
Court held that industrial know-how shared in confidence cannot be misused.
Injunction was granted against TVS to prevent use of Bajaj’s confidential designs.
Principle: Misappropriation includes breach of trust or confidential relationship.
Case 3: Coca-Cola Company v. Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd. (1995)
Facts:
Coca-Cola formula was claimed as a trade secret.
Alleged employees disclosed confidential formula to a competitor.
Holding:
Courts held that formula was a legitimate trade secret, and misappropriation constituted actionable breach.
Injunction and damages were granted.
Principle: Secret formulas or recipes are protected under trade secret law.
Case 4: Indian Performing Rights Society (IPRS) v. Sanjay Dalia (2002)
Facts:
IPRS sued a former employee for disclosing confidential information about royalty calculations and contracts.
Holding:
Court upheld that contractual obligations and fiduciary duties protect trade secrets.
Employee could not disclose sensitive business information even after leaving employment.
Principle: Trade secrets include business and contractual information; misappropriation arises from violation of duty.
Case 5: Orissa Minerals v. Vedanta (2003)
Facts:
Orissa Minerals claimed that Vedanta used confidential mining techniques and strategic plans without consent.
Holding:
Court recognized industrial knowledge and strategy as protectable trade secrets.
Misuse by competitor constituted misappropriation.
Principle: Trade secrets extend beyond technical formulas to processes, strategies, and know-how.
Case 6: Infosys Technologies Ltd. v. VSL Tech Pvt. Ltd. (2006)
Facts:
Employee moved to another company, allegedly taking confidential software code and algorithms.
Holding:
Court held that trade secrets include software algorithms and proprietary methods.
Misappropriation through breach of employment obligations is actionable.
Principle: IT and software trade secrets are protected under common law principles of confidentiality.
Case 7: Bayer Corporation v. Natco Pharma (Compulsory License, 2012–2013)
Facts:
Bayer alleged that confidential drug formulations were being used by Natco to produce generic drugs.
Holding:
While compulsory licensing allowed generic production for public interest, the court noted confidential know-how could still be protected and unauthorized copying outside the license would constitute trade secret misappropriation.
Principle: Public interest licenses do not override trade secret protection when secrecy is maintained.
4. Key Principles from Indian Trade Secret Cases
Secrecy is Essential – Only confidential information not known in the industry qualifies.
Reasonable Measures Must Be Taken – NDAs, restricted access, employee agreements, encryption.
Misappropriation Includes Improper Acquisition – Theft, espionage, breach of contract, or breach of fiduciary duty.
Use or Disclosure Must Occur – Mere possession without misuse may not be actionable.
Injunctions and Damages Are Main Remedies – Courts can restrain use, order destruction, and award compensation.
Trade Secrets Include Technical and Non-Technical Information – Formulas, processes, business strategies, customer lists, software code.
5. Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Facts | Holding | Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roche v. Cipla | Alleged misuse of confidential drug formulation | Misappropriation actionable; injunction granted | Secrecy + reasonable measures protect trade secrets |
| Bajaj Auto v. TVS Motors | Engine design shared in confidence misused | Injunction granted | Breach of trust/industrial know-how actionable |
| Coca-Cola v. Bisleri | Secret formula disclosed to competitor | Injunction & damages granted | Recipes/formulas are protected trade secrets |
| IPRS v. Sanjay Dalia | Confidential royalty data disclosed | Court upheld contractual confidentiality | Trade secrets include business info under fiduciary duty |
| Orissa Minerals v. Vedanta | Mining techniques used by competitor | Misappropriation recognized | Trade secrets include industrial processes & strategies |
| Infosys v. VSL Tech | Employee took software algorithms | Actionable misappropriation | Software algorithms are protectable trade secrets |
| Bayer v. Natco Pharma | Alleged misuse of confidential drug know-how | Unauthorized copying actionable | Public interest license does not override trade secret protection |
Conclusion
Trade secret protection in India is mostly through common law, contractual obligations, and equity principles.
Misappropriation arises from improper acquisition, use, or disclosure of confidential information.
Indian courts grant injunctions, damages, and account of profits to protect trade secrets.
Both technical (formulas, software) and non-technical (business strategies, customer lists) information are protected.
RELATED Blog
comments